Libyan cities about to witness hell on earth!!
Predator armed with Hellfire Missiles
U.S. President Barack Obama has approved the use of armed Predator drones in Libya, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday
The use of drones armed with these missiles has received much criticism in their area of operation. They are normally controlled by the USAF and the CIA and have a very bad track record on grounds of safety. We are told that these will be controlled by the US Defense Department from the West Coast of the US. The operators are professional pilots and fly them just like a computer game.
UAV Control Centre
So what can we expect in Libya after the massive bombardment of depleted uranium weapons……….as I have already indicated a sort of “Hell on Earth with many innocent civilian casualties.
So what are the statistics in Afghanistan:
2009 - Of the 44 Predator strikes carried out by the American drones in the tribal areas of Pakistan in 12 months of 2009, only five were able to hit their actual targets, killing five key Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders, but at the cost of around 700innocent civilian lives.
The article gave a comparison that for every single person taken out it means the death of 140 innocent civilians..
2010 - According to the Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik, U.S. drone strikes killed more than 900 people in Pakistan last year, the vast majority of whom were civilians, often women and children.
2011 - Defense Department officials said that a Hellfire missile killed a Marine and a Navy seaman in Afghanistan. The two U.S. troops were supposedly mistaken for "militants."
The statistics are alarming and in this context Obama is simply adding to the civilian death toll making him guilty of war crimes.
It is interesting to note that British Apache pilots complained that standard Hellfire missiles were going straight through buildings and out of the other side.......once can see that this will clearly increase the number of innocent civilians.
The missiles themselves are horrendous to say the least and are described as follows:
The missile creates a pressure wave which sucks the air out of victims, shreds their internal organs and crushes their bodies. The explosion is described as “Thermobaric” and is known to contain depleted uranium.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has admitted to the use of the weapons, condemned by human rights groups as “brutal.”
Hellfire missile on Predator (inscription "In Memory of Honorable Ronald Reagan) - What a fitting tribute to such a bad President don’t you think?
I was shocked to hear experts talking about these drones and their missiles as being perfectly suitable for suburban warfare and yet statistics and figures do not agree with their comments!!.......the drones and missiles will certainly add to the civilian causalities.
We are now getting regular updates from senior US military staff and also from other political figures in Europe that the situation in Libya is at a standstill and indications are that some of them are pushing for ground troops, which is totally against the UN Resolution remit.
It should also be noted that we are now getting condemnation from the US and UK on the situation that is ongoing in Syria. We have to remember that the US has made it clear in past discussions that Syria is certainly the possible next target, followed by Iran.
Hellfire Missile hits it target (depleted uranium)
I have noticed over the last week or so that many pro depleted uranium supporters are saying that depleted uranium is not only safe but it is also a weapon that is so vital for coalition forces. This is also the stance of our own MoD Dr.Liam Fox……..they are certainly poorly advised and one will soon see the results of this war within the next 6 months or so as a dramatic rise in cancer takes over and gross birth defects. Misarata could well turn into another Falujah!
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 22/4/2011 www.eyreinternational.com
Showing posts with label Petraeus; Afghanistan; WMD; DU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Petraeus; Afghanistan; WMD; DU. Show all posts
Sunday, 8 May 2011
Sunday, 3 October 2010
The War that only the “New World Order” wants!
As with the Russians, we are now seeing the coalition forces, yet again, taking a pounding that will ultimately lead to defeat and one keeps asking the same question why are we in Afghanistan?
The answer is simply because the “New World Order” wants us to be there!
This was has nothing to do with democracy and certainly nothing to do with their punch line “The War on Terrorism.” It’s all about “Imperialistic Greed.”
As we all know the reasons for going to war in Iraq was nothing to do with WMD’s but rather about a well orchestrated plan by the US and the UK to force a regime change. We also now know that 9/11 was a “False Flag Operation” and hence the reasons for going into Afghanistan were purely to make sure a western orientated government was in existence to enable the US and the “New World Order” to achieve its goals.
All the past and current conflicts all come under the title of “Geo Politics” and forms part of “The New World Order” master plan to take control of as much of the world’s resources as is possible, control their markets, build the vital pipeline corridors and police the associated trade routes.
There is no limit that this evil and satanic order are prepared to go. When we add up all the past “False Flag Operations” we can clearly see the magnitude of the problem i.e. US Embassy Bombing Kenya, USS Cole, 9/11, 7/7, Detroit airline attempted bombing, Times Square and more recently the sinking of the South Korean warship…the list is endless. One could also add to this the many apparent terrorism threats to our respective countries and pandemics etc and one can see that the ploy is to spread mass hysteria amongst the people. It is at such times that the government then seize the opportunity to change the law and eventually bring us closer to becoming a “Police State.”
Let’s just take a look at the past and current statistics of troop losses in Afghanistan and one can clearly see that we are certainly loosing this conflict and it is time that we continue to ask the question “Why are we in Afghanistan”?
The statistics clearly show the dramatic rise in coalition deaths up to the current time. Back in 2001 we started at 12 and currently up to the start of October 2010 has risen to 555 (I believe 2 more today).
Add to this the fact that the US (who is the aggressor in this war) is continuously hiding behind the façade called NATO and one can clearly can how the game is played.
US Drones breach the sovereignty of Pakistan on a daily basis and more recently helicopters flew into Pakistan to carry out air strikes. One should note that the US conveniently refer to such attacks as being carried out by NATO helicopter and give no reference to the attack being carried out by themselves. Bringing NATO into this war is all part and parcel of protecting the US from harsh criticism as being the instigators.
The truth behind this war is the fact that our troops are dying to defend the opium crop and its lucrative trade, to establish a transit route for the TAPI pipeline and more importantly to allow the west to get its hands of the incredible wealth in natural resources that lies beneath the soil in Afghanistan.
The US and coalition forces have used every conceivable weapon, including many that are truly WMD’s. They include Tactical Nuclear Weapons, Depleted Uranium Weapons and 4th Generation Weapons which has now basically contaminated the entire country for life. I can still see the face of one Iraqi, who with tears in his eyes, told an American officer that the US has killed the genetics of his country. What is rather sad is the fact that Afghanistan has been pounded with many more WMD’s than Iraq and has been used as a testing ground for their high tech weaponry.
It is only a matter of time before the same results occur, as they have done in Fallujah, where the women have been told, by the Minister of Health, not to have children. This is after the entire district is plagued by high rates of cancer and badly deformed children that die at birth or only live a very short life.
World governments have to apply pressure on the super powers to prohibit the use of any weapon that contains uranium components. Presidents and Prime Minister stand in front of the world’s media stating their achievements in enforcing the NPT and some even receive the Nobel Peace Prize or a Medal.
One really does need to know what is going on behind the scenes and realise that they are mass producing “Mini Nukes” or “Dial up Nukes” and actually using them as and when they feel the need. Add to this the very dirty weapons they are using and one can imagine the global contamination they are creating.
The “New World Order” is behind this master plan of mass genocide, mass depopulation and mass infertility. They have taken over as the police of the world rendering the UN as a non effective body (which belongs to them anyway).
When will the citizens of this world understand that if we stop this excessive greed, stop the wars, close down all military bases on Islamic soil and look after our own backyard the world will be at peace. We have to learn to love our neighbours and start to trade with them and not fight them.
Oh and before I go let’s just look at the current headlines from the US which state:
“U.S. State Department advises on possible attacks in Europe” “Potential for attacks by al-Qaeda and other groups in Europe.” When will they stop this false masquerade they call al-Qaeda and understand that we know that this group does not and has not existed? We are chasing an invisible enemy all in the name of Drugs, Oil, Gas and other Natural Resources. Maybe the warning should read “Standby for another False Flag”
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 3/10/2010
The answer is simply because the “New World Order” wants us to be there!
This was has nothing to do with democracy and certainly nothing to do with their punch line “The War on Terrorism.” It’s all about “Imperialistic Greed.”
As we all know the reasons for going to war in Iraq was nothing to do with WMD’s but rather about a well orchestrated plan by the US and the UK to force a regime change. We also now know that 9/11 was a “False Flag Operation” and hence the reasons for going into Afghanistan were purely to make sure a western orientated government was in existence to enable the US and the “New World Order” to achieve its goals.
All the past and current conflicts all come under the title of “Geo Politics” and forms part of “The New World Order” master plan to take control of as much of the world’s resources as is possible, control their markets, build the vital pipeline corridors and police the associated trade routes.
There is no limit that this evil and satanic order are prepared to go. When we add up all the past “False Flag Operations” we can clearly see the magnitude of the problem i.e. US Embassy Bombing Kenya, USS Cole, 9/11, 7/7, Detroit airline attempted bombing, Times Square and more recently the sinking of the South Korean warship…the list is endless. One could also add to this the many apparent terrorism threats to our respective countries and pandemics etc and one can see that the ploy is to spread mass hysteria amongst the people. It is at such times that the government then seize the opportunity to change the law and eventually bring us closer to becoming a “Police State.”
Let’s just take a look at the past and current statistics of troop losses in Afghanistan and one can clearly see that we are certainly loosing this conflict and it is time that we continue to ask the question “Why are we in Afghanistan”?
The statistics clearly show the dramatic rise in coalition deaths up to the current time. Back in 2001 we started at 12 and currently up to the start of October 2010 has risen to 555 (I believe 2 more today).
Add to this the fact that the US (who is the aggressor in this war) is continuously hiding behind the façade called NATO and one can clearly can how the game is played.
US Drones breach the sovereignty of Pakistan on a daily basis and more recently helicopters flew into Pakistan to carry out air strikes. One should note that the US conveniently refer to such attacks as being carried out by NATO helicopter and give no reference to the attack being carried out by themselves. Bringing NATO into this war is all part and parcel of protecting the US from harsh criticism as being the instigators.
The truth behind this war is the fact that our troops are dying to defend the opium crop and its lucrative trade, to establish a transit route for the TAPI pipeline and more importantly to allow the west to get its hands of the incredible wealth in natural resources that lies beneath the soil in Afghanistan.
The US and coalition forces have used every conceivable weapon, including many that are truly WMD’s. They include Tactical Nuclear Weapons, Depleted Uranium Weapons and 4th Generation Weapons which has now basically contaminated the entire country for life. I can still see the face of one Iraqi, who with tears in his eyes, told an American officer that the US has killed the genetics of his country. What is rather sad is the fact that Afghanistan has been pounded with many more WMD’s than Iraq and has been used as a testing ground for their high tech weaponry.
It is only a matter of time before the same results occur, as they have done in Fallujah, where the women have been told, by the Minister of Health, not to have children. This is after the entire district is plagued by high rates of cancer and badly deformed children that die at birth or only live a very short life.
World governments have to apply pressure on the super powers to prohibit the use of any weapon that contains uranium components. Presidents and Prime Minister stand in front of the world’s media stating their achievements in enforcing the NPT and some even receive the Nobel Peace Prize or a Medal.
One really does need to know what is going on behind the scenes and realise that they are mass producing “Mini Nukes” or “Dial up Nukes” and actually using them as and when they feel the need. Add to this the very dirty weapons they are using and one can imagine the global contamination they are creating.
The “New World Order” is behind this master plan of mass genocide, mass depopulation and mass infertility. They have taken over as the police of the world rendering the UN as a non effective body (which belongs to them anyway).
When will the citizens of this world understand that if we stop this excessive greed, stop the wars, close down all military bases on Islamic soil and look after our own backyard the world will be at peace. We have to learn to love our neighbours and start to trade with them and not fight them.
Oh and before I go let’s just look at the current headlines from the US which state:
“U.S. State Department advises on possible attacks in Europe” “Potential for attacks by al-Qaeda and other groups in Europe.” When will they stop this false masquerade they call al-Qaeda and understand that we know that this group does not and has not existed? We are chasing an invisible enemy all in the name of Drugs, Oil, Gas and other Natural Resources. Maybe the warning should read “Standby for another False Flag”
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 3/10/2010
Friday, 17 September 2010
We live in an extremely unbalanced world
Don’t you find it so disturbing when titles and awards are handed out to key figures around the world who have not earned their new found status?
Barrack Obama as we all know received the Nobel Peace Prize soon after he took office and the whole word was asking why?
It is a know fact that many people that are guilty of war crimes or who just happen to hold some very sensitive information are rewarded with a Knighthood to shut them up
The greatest insult to the ethical people that live on the planet was when Tony Blair received the Liberty Medal in recognition for his commitment to conflict resolution. President Bill Clinton, Chair of the National Constitution Center, awarded the prestigious medal to former Prime Minister Blair at a public ceremony on Monday, September 13, 2010 at the National Constitution Center (NCC) in Historic Philadelphia.
Tony Blair is certainly not worthy of this award and when I read the praise that was handed out by the former US President, Bill Clinton (not exactly a role model himself) it certainly made one want to throw up:
"Now, as a private citizen, Tony continues to demonstrate the same leadership, dedication and creativity in promoting economic opportunity in the Middle East and the resolution of conflicts rooted in religion around the world, and is building the capacity of developing nations to govern honestly and effectively. I'm pleased the Constitution Center is awarding him the Liberty Medal in recognition of his work to promote the actions necessary to make peace, reconciliation, and prosperity possible."
Maybe we, who live in the real world, remember that this man is indeed a war criminal. He received a substantial back hander from Bernie Ecclestone (of Formula 1 fame) over the three South African/British nukes deal that were later stolen, he falsified his reason for going to war with Iraq and to this day still believes he was right.
The previous government that came under the control of Maggie Thatcher and later John Major and many extremely senior political figures all knew of the “Under the Table Deal” between the US – UK – South Africa in the acquisition of these “Battlefield Ready” nuclear bombs, including the current Prime Minister David Cameron who actually went down to South Africa with Ken Warren to seal the deal.
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and many of his senior political figures all knew that the Conservative Party stole 17.8 million pounds of tax payer’s money in the above deal to the benefit of the Tory Party election fund.
When one learns that the government is trying to recover costs from the general public as a direct result of a mistake made by the Tax Office it really does not make sense, especially when you realise that the above stolen money, to this day, has not been accounted for.
Another issue that has been kept under lock and key is the fact that when Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were in office they became aware of a massive paedophilia ring operating at all levels throughout the UK, including many political figures and did nothing about it. This same massive paedophilia problem was also made know to David Cameron and Nick Clegg who for some time have turned their backs on such people as Hollie Greig, the Down Syndrome girl who was gang raped over a period of almost 14 years by people in high places, including the Sherriff of Aberdeen.
When you add to this the fact that the British Prime Ministers and their Governments have participated in gross illegal arms trading during UN sanctions and the fact that it was their intention to keep certain conflicts going, especially that between Iraq – Iran, then one can see that these leaders certainly had evil intentions, which continues to this day.
Finally we come to the fact that Tony Blair also received this accolade for his efforts in the Balkans War but do we the public fully understand that under his command we left a legacy of pain and suffering.
The war in the Balkans was a blend of Geo Politics and Ethnic Cleansing. One really does need to understand that transit routes for intended pipelines, that are so vital to the west’s economy, have to be planned. If during this planning stage the transit route just so happens to pass via an area of unrest or conflict then those countries involved in the project then need to secure the area. Basically it’s a case of I want my pipeline to go through the Balkans and so lets get in there and sort it out.
As we have since learnt this was the main reason for going into the Balkans so that the west could install a pipeline to bypass Russian territory and bring Caspian oil and gas to Europe…….that is called “Geo Politics.” The other issue from the west’s perspective was that of the existence of large numbers of Muslim in this vital trade route area and their ongoing dispute with Christian factors.
As a direct result of both Bush and Blair’s actions in the Balkans they have now left an area that is extremely contaminated with radiation from an array of weapons used, most of which contained depleted uranium (DU). The NATO forces played down the amount of DU that was used by saying it was only the rounds fired from the US A10 aircraft but in actual fact this was far from the truth. The UN eventually sent their team of blind experts into the region to confirm the existence of only A10 rounds and basically declared the area as safe apart from a few enclaves. This in itself was an absolute cover up by the UN and I would strongly suggest that they themselves go live there!
The US, UK and other NATO forces used excessive amounts of DU weapons ranging from A10 rounds – Bunker Busters – JDAM Bombs – Armour Piercing Shells and Cruise Missiles……all of which have uranium components. This has now left the countries that were involved in this conflict with gross contamination and very high levels of cancers, diabetes and many other DU related illnesses. It has now reached a point that many younger people are dying and the village graveyards at many locations no longer have the capacity to bury their dead in their own village.
One also has to understand that this contamination does not stay in the country of conflict and does not recognise international borders. The nano particles from these weapons would not only cross into adjacent countries but also drift around the whole of Europe and the world. I have very details evidence of weapons used and by whom.
What deeply upset me was when Tony Blair paid a visit to the area recently and was welcomed as a hero for giving them their freedom. This shows just how naïve people can become when they don’t understand that this man was partly responsible for “Nuking” the area. It must be clearly understood that the President, Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary, Minister of Defence and senior military officers of all these countries are all fully aware of the weapons used in conflict and the consequences in their usage. They are all aware of the health issues that follow such conflicts on both the populations and their own troops and in that context they are guilty of war crimes.
When you also add to this the fact that so many “False Flag” incidents are occurring on an almost monthly basis we can at last start to realise that the “Axis of Evil” is right in our own backyard. We have to understand that some of these incidents have taken us to war. To name a few 9/11, USS Cole, 7/7, Detroit Airline incident, Times Square and more recently the sinking of the South Korean Warship. There is also a good indication that Haiti was caused by HAARP (US) and also the latest BP spill is deeply suspect.
How can we in the west point a finger at these so called terrorists in the Middle East when we ourselves carry out our own terrorism on our own people.
Blair is just one of a long list of people who should be tried for War Crimes……I would also add many Presidents, Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Gates, Wolfowitz, and a very long list of those further down the line in both the US and the UK.
It is only when you become observant and start to ask questions yourself and then start extensive and exhaustive investigations that it all starts to come together and make sense. You have to be able to scan lots of video footage and statements and then put it all together. If the government or the anti terrorist authority shows a CCTV video as evidence to the media, revealing the movement of the so called bombers/terrorist, time date and location etc then we obviously believe it…..I found one that showed a date that was one week before the event took place. I saw another which showed a highjacker boarding an aircraft in Boston when in actual fact it was in Portland and also displayed the wrong time!
We the public have to start thinking from a different perspective…..do not believe what you see and do not believe what they want you to believe. Check it out yourself and make sure that you understand and agree with what you have been told. There is a mounting army of professionals covering Professional Pilots, Operations Staff, Air Traffic Controller, Military Staff, Civil Engineers, Demolition Experts, Explosive Experts etc who are now re grouping to challenge the scam of 9/11……only people in mass can challenge this cover up and challenge they will…..it all takes time.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 16/9/2010
Barrack Obama as we all know received the Nobel Peace Prize soon after he took office and the whole word was asking why?
It is a know fact that many people that are guilty of war crimes or who just happen to hold some very sensitive information are rewarded with a Knighthood to shut them up
The greatest insult to the ethical people that live on the planet was when Tony Blair received the Liberty Medal in recognition for his commitment to conflict resolution. President Bill Clinton, Chair of the National Constitution Center, awarded the prestigious medal to former Prime Minister Blair at a public ceremony on Monday, September 13, 2010 at the National Constitution Center (NCC) in Historic Philadelphia.
Tony Blair is certainly not worthy of this award and when I read the praise that was handed out by the former US President, Bill Clinton (not exactly a role model himself) it certainly made one want to throw up:
"Now, as a private citizen, Tony continues to demonstrate the same leadership, dedication and creativity in promoting economic opportunity in the Middle East and the resolution of conflicts rooted in religion around the world, and is building the capacity of developing nations to govern honestly and effectively. I'm pleased the Constitution Center is awarding him the Liberty Medal in recognition of his work to promote the actions necessary to make peace, reconciliation, and prosperity possible."
Maybe we, who live in the real world, remember that this man is indeed a war criminal. He received a substantial back hander from Bernie Ecclestone (of Formula 1 fame) over the three South African/British nukes deal that were later stolen, he falsified his reason for going to war with Iraq and to this day still believes he was right.
The previous government that came under the control of Maggie Thatcher and later John Major and many extremely senior political figures all knew of the “Under the Table Deal” between the US – UK – South Africa in the acquisition of these “Battlefield Ready” nuclear bombs, including the current Prime Minister David Cameron who actually went down to South Africa with Ken Warren to seal the deal.
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and many of his senior political figures all knew that the Conservative Party stole 17.8 million pounds of tax payer’s money in the above deal to the benefit of the Tory Party election fund.
When one learns that the government is trying to recover costs from the general public as a direct result of a mistake made by the Tax Office it really does not make sense, especially when you realise that the above stolen money, to this day, has not been accounted for.
Another issue that has been kept under lock and key is the fact that when Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were in office they became aware of a massive paedophilia ring operating at all levels throughout the UK, including many political figures and did nothing about it. This same massive paedophilia problem was also made know to David Cameron and Nick Clegg who for some time have turned their backs on such people as Hollie Greig, the Down Syndrome girl who was gang raped over a period of almost 14 years by people in high places, including the Sherriff of Aberdeen.
When you add to this the fact that the British Prime Ministers and their Governments have participated in gross illegal arms trading during UN sanctions and the fact that it was their intention to keep certain conflicts going, especially that between Iraq – Iran, then one can see that these leaders certainly had evil intentions, which continues to this day.
Finally we come to the fact that Tony Blair also received this accolade for his efforts in the Balkans War but do we the public fully understand that under his command we left a legacy of pain and suffering.
The war in the Balkans was a blend of Geo Politics and Ethnic Cleansing. One really does need to understand that transit routes for intended pipelines, that are so vital to the west’s economy, have to be planned. If during this planning stage the transit route just so happens to pass via an area of unrest or conflict then those countries involved in the project then need to secure the area. Basically it’s a case of I want my pipeline to go through the Balkans and so lets get in there and sort it out.
As we have since learnt this was the main reason for going into the Balkans so that the west could install a pipeline to bypass Russian territory and bring Caspian oil and gas to Europe…….that is called “Geo Politics.” The other issue from the west’s perspective was that of the existence of large numbers of Muslim in this vital trade route area and their ongoing dispute with Christian factors.
As a direct result of both Bush and Blair’s actions in the Balkans they have now left an area that is extremely contaminated with radiation from an array of weapons used, most of which contained depleted uranium (DU). The NATO forces played down the amount of DU that was used by saying it was only the rounds fired from the US A10 aircraft but in actual fact this was far from the truth. The UN eventually sent their team of blind experts into the region to confirm the existence of only A10 rounds and basically declared the area as safe apart from a few enclaves. This in itself was an absolute cover up by the UN and I would strongly suggest that they themselves go live there!
The US, UK and other NATO forces used excessive amounts of DU weapons ranging from A10 rounds – Bunker Busters – JDAM Bombs – Armour Piercing Shells and Cruise Missiles……all of which have uranium components. This has now left the countries that were involved in this conflict with gross contamination and very high levels of cancers, diabetes and many other DU related illnesses. It has now reached a point that many younger people are dying and the village graveyards at many locations no longer have the capacity to bury their dead in their own village.
One also has to understand that this contamination does not stay in the country of conflict and does not recognise international borders. The nano particles from these weapons would not only cross into adjacent countries but also drift around the whole of Europe and the world. I have very details evidence of weapons used and by whom.
What deeply upset me was when Tony Blair paid a visit to the area recently and was welcomed as a hero for giving them their freedom. This shows just how naïve people can become when they don’t understand that this man was partly responsible for “Nuking” the area. It must be clearly understood that the President, Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary, Minister of Defence and senior military officers of all these countries are all fully aware of the weapons used in conflict and the consequences in their usage. They are all aware of the health issues that follow such conflicts on both the populations and their own troops and in that context they are guilty of war crimes.
When you also add to this the fact that so many “False Flag” incidents are occurring on an almost monthly basis we can at last start to realise that the “Axis of Evil” is right in our own backyard. We have to understand that some of these incidents have taken us to war. To name a few 9/11, USS Cole, 7/7, Detroit Airline incident, Times Square and more recently the sinking of the South Korean Warship. There is also a good indication that Haiti was caused by HAARP (US) and also the latest BP spill is deeply suspect.
How can we in the west point a finger at these so called terrorists in the Middle East when we ourselves carry out our own terrorism on our own people.
Blair is just one of a long list of people who should be tried for War Crimes……I would also add many Presidents, Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Gates, Wolfowitz, and a very long list of those further down the line in both the US and the UK.
It is only when you become observant and start to ask questions yourself and then start extensive and exhaustive investigations that it all starts to come together and make sense. You have to be able to scan lots of video footage and statements and then put it all together. If the government or the anti terrorist authority shows a CCTV video as evidence to the media, revealing the movement of the so called bombers/terrorist, time date and location etc then we obviously believe it…..I found one that showed a date that was one week before the event took place. I saw another which showed a highjacker boarding an aircraft in Boston when in actual fact it was in Portland and also displayed the wrong time!
We the public have to start thinking from a different perspective…..do not believe what you see and do not believe what they want you to believe. Check it out yourself and make sure that you understand and agree with what you have been told. There is a mounting army of professionals covering Professional Pilots, Operations Staff, Air Traffic Controller, Military Staff, Civil Engineers, Demolition Experts, Explosive Experts etc who are now re grouping to challenge the scam of 9/11……only people in mass can challenge this cover up and challenge they will…..it all takes time.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 16/9/2010
Thursday, 12 August 2010
When will the British have a true leader?
When will the British have a government that serves the people?
When will we stop our aggressive foreign policy?
Part 1
The purpose of writing this short series of articles is to prove that for a couple of decades (or even possibly longer) we have not had a government in office that is truly representative of the people for the people. In actual fact I would go a stage further and say that they all carried out an act of treason against the constitution of the United Kingdom and caused immeasurable suffering and death to the people it represents.
These respective leaders, ministers and government embarked on a policy that not only put this country at great risk but also knowingly used weapons that were in violation of the Geneva Convention. They were not only Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) but also totally indiscriminate, resulting in the death/sickness of millions of innocent civilians, their own military forces and then crossing international borders to continue their deadly journey around the globe.
There is no question or doubt that these past and current leaders, the British Government, Ministers and the Ministry of Defence knew of the implications in using such weapons, which beyond a shadow of doubt implicates them as being guilty of war crimes, amounting to mass genocide. In order to paint this picture of deceit and treachery we must start with the current Prime Minister and work backwards.
We currently see (the not so new kid on the block) David Cameron launch himself down the same path of self destruction and one could ask what makes him any different to all those that were before him? From my perspective I can see our new Prime Minister possible turning into one of the worst ever.
So what sets this man aside from the others and what makes this particular cabinet dangerous. To find the answer to this and many other concerns one has to turn the clock back to when David Cameron was a young, up and coming, researcher for the Conservative Party under the apron strings of the “Iron Lady” herself, Maggie Thatcher. One has to see how this man with other senior members of government allowed our country to be put in grave danger all in the name of money and personal gain.
Back in 1975 all sorts of clandestine operations were taking place in South Africa ranging from a very active Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) programme and also advances in nuclear research. All of this activity was being monitored and approved by both the US and UK Governments. It was in this same year that South Africa announced that it had a pilot plant for uranium enrichment at Pelindaba. Ninety-seven pounds of enriched uranium, enough to make seven atomic bombs, was shipped to the plant by the US Nuclear Corporation of Oak Ridge, Tennessee to assist it.
From 1977 onwards the US policy to South Africa hardened. Because of its exploitation of Namibian uranium, South Africa was removed from its permanent position in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Shortly thereafter, Soviet satellite pictures showing South Africa preparing to detonate a nuclear explosive in the Kalahari Desert brought a warning from US president Jimmy Carter not to do so.
In 1979 the “Iron Lady” Maggie Thatcher came to power and progressively introduced Neo – Liberalism during her reign which many believe was the downfall of the United Kingdom. However Thatcher also became involved in some very sinister discussions, one being the trip to South Africa by her errand boy David Cameron. Our current Prime Minister at the tender age of 24 went down to South Africa on an all expenses paid jolly compliments or ARMSCOR. David was accompanied by the only technical person capable of dealing with this very controversial deal (acquisition of three battlefield nuclear bombs) non other than Ken Warren (now Sir Ken Warren) who appears to be the mastermind behind this very shonky deal which we will cover later in this series, which is in date order.
It was during the 1980 that things started to step up a notch both in the area of CBW development and also in South Africa’s under the table nuclear weapons research. It was also around this time that development of a “Super Gun” started to emerge all of which was known and supported by both the US and the UK.
Early in the war with Iran, the Iraqi government engaged world- renowned artillery expert Gerald V. Bull, whose lifetime obsession was the construction of a "Supergun," a huge howitzer able to fire satellites into space or launch artillery shells thousands of miles into enemy territory. Bull did not accomplish his dream and was sentenced and jailed for one year in 1980 for illegally selling weapons [encouraged by the CIA] to South Africa. Despite the US arms embargo he did manage to design some of the most effective artillery pieces in the world.
In April 1981 US Secretary of State, Alexander Haig, invited South African Foreign Minister, Pik Botha, to the US, and the French, British and US vetoed four UN resolutions calling for sanctions against South Africa. For the next four years South Africa could count on a more tolerant US attitude and the full support of Britain..
In September 1982, Armscor announced that its G-5 tow and the G-6 SP Gun/Tow could fire nuclear rounds if necessary, but that South Africa did not intend to use such weapons. The existence of the G5 towed artillery piece was revealed to the world and surprise was expressed that such an advanced system could be developed locally. The G6 was revealed in the mid 1980's. The G6 and G5 are built by LIW, a division of DENEL in South Africa.
It was during the Iraq – Iran War that the Iraqi government dispatched a private aircraft to Geneva to take Bull to Baghdad. So began a long association between Bull and the government of Iraq, and its then-defense minister, Saddam Hussein. Bull dealt with Iraq for almost 10 years. Iraq was one of many states with guns developed by Bull. His clients are known to include his native Canada, the United States, South Africa, Iran, Chile, Taiwan, China, and Libya.
Gerard Bull was first contracted by the Iraqi government in 1981. They desperately needed artillery to out-range the enemy in the protracted Iran-Iraq War. The association allowed Bull to yet again seek sponsorship of a space-launch supergun. Sadam Hussein liked the idea, and Project Babylon was born. Throughout the 1980's Bull's dealings with Iraq had the covert approval of Western governments, who saw Iraq as a counterweight to revolutionary Iran.
In March of 1988, Bull received a contract to build two full sized 'Project Babylon' 1000 mm superguns and one 'Baby Babylon' 350 mm prototype for a total of $25 million. The project was given the cover designation 'PC-2' (Petrochemical Complex-2). British engineer Christopher Cowley was the project manager.
The greatest concern by the international community was Iraq's arsenal of guns developed by Gerald Bull from mid-1981 until he was assassinated by what was believed to be Israeli intelligence on 22 March 1990. Two hundred of these guns, termed GH-N-45 were manufactured in Austria and were shipped to Iraq via Jordan in 1985 for use in the Iran-Iraq war. The remaining 100 were manufactured in South Africa, where they are marketed under the name G-5. The G-5 can deliver a tactical nuclear warhead, chemical shells or any NATO standard 155mm shell.
It is my intentions in this series of articles to explain just how corrupt and two faced governments can become whereby they install or support a west friendly President to carry out their own hidden agenda. In this case Saddam was one such President that had the full support of both the US and UK governments with the intention of keeping the Iraq/ Iran war running as long as possible. This next paragraph explains what was going on at the time. At a later date we would see two inquiries emerge one being the Scott Inquiry and also the Matrix Churchill inquiry both of which became a total farce and government cover – up with the latter beings scuppered by the British Government before it even got underway.
The following is an extraction of an article highlighting UK’s involvement in the supergun affair: Iraq used the petrochemical complex two (PC-2) project as a front to purchase components for Gerald Bull's super gun. Matrix Churchill was a long established Midlands based machine tool manufacturer which was purchased in 1987 by an Iraqi controlled company, TMG Engineering Ltd, which was in turn controlled by another Iraqi controlled company, Technology and Development Group Ltd (TDG). The military uses of Matrix-Churchill machines are the prime reason Iraq was interested in purchasing the company. Acquiring Matrix-Churchill gave Iraq access, not only to the machine tools, but also the computer programming, tooling, and other components needed to make a wide variety of munitions as well as other applications in aerospace and nuclear industries. The Iraqi NASSR Establishment for Mechanical Industries contracted with the company for the supply of machine tools for a project, code named "ABA", to manufacture parts for multi launcher rocket systems. In addition, supergun components were fabricated in separate parts by factories in England (Forgemasters in Sheffield), Spain, Holland and Switzerland. Acting on an anonymous tip, British Customs seized the final eight sections of the Super Gun in November 1990. The work skirted the law but remained legal, as illustrated by Britain's unsuccessful prosecution of the case, following the joint British-American sting operation that uncovered key supergun equipment transfers.
The background to this article was created to Tara Davison who dealt with intelligence matters/investigations at the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and who became a whistleblower on the illegal arms trade carried out by the British Government, especially in the Middle East. When one links this scam with the nuclear weapons deal in South Africa one can clearly see that the respective leaders and their governments will do anything to either encourage conflict or to elongate a war in order to gain financial reward for themselves or their political party. I will return to some aspects of Tara Davison’s account later on in this mini series.
It should also be noted that when certain incidents happen to get into the media the leaders and their government would suddenly duck for cover and embark on covering up their tracks as soon as possible. However, sadly this also entailed the removal of key witnesses by well planned assassinations or the imprisonment of others so as not to allow the vital evidence to reach the court or a public enquiry. Three examples being the arrest and imprisonment of key British figures involved in the super gun deal, the assassination of the designer, Gerald Bull, followed by the South African nuclear weapons scam and the assassination of Dr David Kelly to protect those in high places which I will be covering in part 2 of this series.
As I have pointed out that once the media get their teeth into such scams, all hell lets loose. On such report by the BBC appeared in 1990 and said the following: Customs seize 'supergun.' Customs officers in Middlesbrough say they have seized what they believe to be the barrel of a massive gun on a ship bound for Iraq.
Exports of parts for a weapon to Iraq would contravene British restrictions on arms sales to President Saddam Hussein's state. Eight pipes were found in crates during a search of the ship at the Teesport Docks. The length of the barrel is said to measure 40 metres (130 feet) when assembled. This would make it by far the largest gun in the world with a range of approximately 600 miles (965 kilometres). The ship where the pipes were found, the Gur Mariner, is being chartered by the Iraqi Maritime Organisation.
The main issue I am trying to raise in my articles is the fact that the leaders and governments on both sides of the pond have been and continue to pull the wool over our eyes to cover up their evil covert ways of manipulating the Geo Politics of this planet. They encourage conflict in order to become involved in areas of hostility such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia etc. They also covertly distribute arms illegally, which in some cases are used against our own forces or those of our allies. The arms manufacturing business is one of the most lucrative in the world and conflict or wars turns over huge amounts of money…….it also has the ability to increase the price of oil and gas which also props up the companies they own. One must also remember that in amongst this mass deceit are private deals going on to which they themselves benefit from or that attract huge sums of money for their own political party to enhance an election or a particular candidate. We will cover one such case later.
One point I would like to make in regard to the pre arranged assassinations of Gerald Bull and Dr David Kelly is to ask the question “Where is the true axis of evil and at what level are they prepared to go”? We all fully understand they are both linked to illegal arms deals (Super Gun and South African nukes) and that very senior politicians were implicated.. We could also ask some questions about the death of Robin Cooke (Ex British Foreign Minister) and also Michael Todd (Ex Manchester Police Chief) both of whom had some very strong views……the list is endless…….we could also add to this the crash of the Chinook helicopter that mysteriously crashed on the Mull of Kintyre in Scotland with 25 high level security and intelligence experts from Northern Ireland onboard. One should have some serious concerns that the Chinook Inquiry was a cover up by Ministry of Defence with the involvement of the DTI and the British Secret Service.
Anyway let’s get back to the main story and talk about another evil episode relating to Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW): The following is an extraction from another report regarding more government cover ups: On 11 April 1994 the ambassadors of the US and UK met with President De Klerk. According to Ambassador Princeton Lyman of the United States, who was present during these meetings, the US and UK were concerned that the South African CBW information was “in danger of being acquired by other states, in particular Libya, and that South African scientists could be recruited by these states.
Lyman recalls that after the 1994 election the US and UK waited for De Klerk to brief President Mandela. They believed that this briefing had to take place before Mandela’s inauguration. Five days before the inauguration, when the briefing had not taken place, the US “alerted Thabo Mbeki that there was a proliferation matter of great concern that we [the US and UK] would need to address
The continued trips undertaken by Wouter Basson (cardiologist and former head of the country's secret chemical and biological warfare “Project Coast”) to Libya were still a matter of concern to the US and UK. In January 1995 a third démarche was brought by the governments of the US and UK. Dr Graham Pearson, former Director-General of the UK Defence Ministry’s Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment at Porton Down, who was present during the meetings that followed, said that the intention of the démarche was to request the South African government to provide a credible CBM statement to the BTWC. He said that no comment was made about the nature of the programme and no questions were asked about it. Lyman records that the most difficult issue of the meeting was Basson’s travels to Libya and elsewhere.
It was also revealed that government bodies were united in their wish to prevent public exposure of the programme and were warned of the threat the hearing posed to foreign relations, not least because documents relating to the 1993 and 1994 démarches of the US and UK were found in the trunks. It was argued that if details of these demarches (political protests) were to emerge, trust between the three countries (US, UK and South Africa) would be severely compromised.
The government hoped for a cancellation of the hearing, or at the very least an agreement that the hearing would be conducted in camera. Neither of which were acceptable to the Commission. Finally, in a bid to reduce the potential damage the hearing could cause to foreign relations, the government insisted that a rigorous process be undertaken to identify and approve the documents which could be used in the hearing. A policy was agreed upon: not to make public any documents that could provide technical information to potential proliferators, and the documents pertaining to the démarches would not be made public.
It has often been questioned whether the South Africa programme does indeed offer internationally applicable lessons when measured against the biological weapons and/or chemical programmes of Iraq, the United States, the Soviet Union and Japan which were several orders of magnitude larger and were aimed at the development of large-scale biological weapons for conventional use.
There is evidence to indicate that the intelligence agencies of at least the United States, the United Kingdom and Switzerland were aware of the SADF’s interest in chemical and biological warfare and were aware of Basson’s role in the programme from the early 1980s. Despite being states parties to the Biological and Toxins Weapons Convention (BTWC) these states chose not to confront the apartheid government with their suspicions about treaty violation until shortly before the 1994 elections because they were neither threatened by the programme nor had much to gain politically from calling Pretoria to account
It should also be noted that a Dr William Augerson (US deputy assistant Secretary of Defence for health resources and programmes), according to Basson’s notes, issued a statement indicating that the USA “does in fact do offensive research/have and offensive research capacity” and that “he [Augerson] states that any country with a chemical industry should be able to produce offensive chemicals.” Basson also credits Augerson with the opinion that, “chemical attack is an ideal tactical weapon against terrorist organisations”
The US and UK clearly knew enough about the South African CBW program to judge that the CBM submitted by South Africa was inaccurate (why else would they have been concerned about Basson’s contact with Libya?). Why, then, did the US and UK choose to do and say nothing to prevent the South African CBW program from continuing during the 1980s and early 1990s? The answer to this question probably lies in US policy towards South Africa during the Cold War.
To conclude: the main intention of this mini series is to reveal just how corrupt and deceitful our respective leaders, ministers and governments officials have been. It will reveal that behind the scenes it breaches UN resolutions, embargoes, illegal arms trading and frequently encourages/enhances conflict.
Both sides of the pond frequently use the term “The Axis of Evil” and yet when one gets the opportunity to investigate this spider’s web of deceit we can see the evil that’s exist deep within the corridors of power. It became clear that back in the days of Maggie Thatcher and right up to the current time that what we read about and what actually goes on is truly beyond words.
It is apparent that our respective governments and intelligence services create their many false flags to take us to war to either enhance their own position in this crazy geo political world or to control their own hidden agenda of seeking to control the world’s resources and markets and at the same time protect the drugs that play such a lucrative part in our economy.
It is also an act of treason and a breach of the Geneva Convention that our governments put not only the populations of the world at risk but also that of our military forces by using WMD’s that they knowingly contaminate with radiation nano particles.
Part two of this mini series will continue with more of this deceit when we cover detail of the loss of the South African nuclear weapons, the illegal arms trade and the manipulation of our governments by those that brush their palms with significant amounts of money. One could also include the current Naomi Campbell “Blood Diamond” cover up whereby it was a known fact that diamonds were exchanged for arms from South Africa which in turn fuelled conflict in Liberia and Sierra Leone. It should also be remembered that Charles Taylor who remains at the centre of the current War Crimes Trial was aided and abetted by the CIA in the US….now you can see just how sordid this whole arms dealing becomes. It all comes down to the fact; can you trust your leaders and their governments? We already know the answer to this question.
Keep watching this space for the truth and remember yet again those words of Ghandi: "When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS."
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 12/8/2010
When will we stop our aggressive foreign policy?
Part 1
The purpose of writing this short series of articles is to prove that for a couple of decades (or even possibly longer) we have not had a government in office that is truly representative of the people for the people. In actual fact I would go a stage further and say that they all carried out an act of treason against the constitution of the United Kingdom and caused immeasurable suffering and death to the people it represents.
These respective leaders, ministers and government embarked on a policy that not only put this country at great risk but also knowingly used weapons that were in violation of the Geneva Convention. They were not only Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) but also totally indiscriminate, resulting in the death/sickness of millions of innocent civilians, their own military forces and then crossing international borders to continue their deadly journey around the globe.
There is no question or doubt that these past and current leaders, the British Government, Ministers and the Ministry of Defence knew of the implications in using such weapons, which beyond a shadow of doubt implicates them as being guilty of war crimes, amounting to mass genocide. In order to paint this picture of deceit and treachery we must start with the current Prime Minister and work backwards.
We currently see (the not so new kid on the block) David Cameron launch himself down the same path of self destruction and one could ask what makes him any different to all those that were before him? From my perspective I can see our new Prime Minister possible turning into one of the worst ever.
So what sets this man aside from the others and what makes this particular cabinet dangerous. To find the answer to this and many other concerns one has to turn the clock back to when David Cameron was a young, up and coming, researcher for the Conservative Party under the apron strings of the “Iron Lady” herself, Maggie Thatcher. One has to see how this man with other senior members of government allowed our country to be put in grave danger all in the name of money and personal gain.
Back in 1975 all sorts of clandestine operations were taking place in South Africa ranging from a very active Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) programme and also advances in nuclear research. All of this activity was being monitored and approved by both the US and UK Governments. It was in this same year that South Africa announced that it had a pilot plant for uranium enrichment at Pelindaba. Ninety-seven pounds of enriched uranium, enough to make seven atomic bombs, was shipped to the plant by the US Nuclear Corporation of Oak Ridge, Tennessee to assist it.
From 1977 onwards the US policy to South Africa hardened. Because of its exploitation of Namibian uranium, South Africa was removed from its permanent position in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Shortly thereafter, Soviet satellite pictures showing South Africa preparing to detonate a nuclear explosive in the Kalahari Desert brought a warning from US president Jimmy Carter not to do so.
In 1979 the “Iron Lady” Maggie Thatcher came to power and progressively introduced Neo – Liberalism during her reign which many believe was the downfall of the United Kingdom. However Thatcher also became involved in some very sinister discussions, one being the trip to South Africa by her errand boy David Cameron. Our current Prime Minister at the tender age of 24 went down to South Africa on an all expenses paid jolly compliments or ARMSCOR. David was accompanied by the only technical person capable of dealing with this very controversial deal (acquisition of three battlefield nuclear bombs) non other than Ken Warren (now Sir Ken Warren) who appears to be the mastermind behind this very shonky deal which we will cover later in this series, which is in date order.
It was during the 1980 that things started to step up a notch both in the area of CBW development and also in South Africa’s under the table nuclear weapons research. It was also around this time that development of a “Super Gun” started to emerge all of which was known and supported by both the US and the UK.
Early in the war with Iran, the Iraqi government engaged world- renowned artillery expert Gerald V. Bull, whose lifetime obsession was the construction of a "Supergun," a huge howitzer able to fire satellites into space or launch artillery shells thousands of miles into enemy territory. Bull did not accomplish his dream and was sentenced and jailed for one year in 1980 for illegally selling weapons [encouraged by the CIA] to South Africa. Despite the US arms embargo he did manage to design some of the most effective artillery pieces in the world.
In April 1981 US Secretary of State, Alexander Haig, invited South African Foreign Minister, Pik Botha, to the US, and the French, British and US vetoed four UN resolutions calling for sanctions against South Africa. For the next four years South Africa could count on a more tolerant US attitude and the full support of Britain..
In September 1982, Armscor announced that its G-5 tow and the G-6 SP Gun/Tow could fire nuclear rounds if necessary, but that South Africa did not intend to use such weapons. The existence of the G5 towed artillery piece was revealed to the world and surprise was expressed that such an advanced system could be developed locally. The G6 was revealed in the mid 1980's. The G6 and G5 are built by LIW, a division of DENEL in South Africa.
It was during the Iraq – Iran War that the Iraqi government dispatched a private aircraft to Geneva to take Bull to Baghdad. So began a long association between Bull and the government of Iraq, and its then-defense minister, Saddam Hussein. Bull dealt with Iraq for almost 10 years. Iraq was one of many states with guns developed by Bull. His clients are known to include his native Canada, the United States, South Africa, Iran, Chile, Taiwan, China, and Libya.
Gerard Bull was first contracted by the Iraqi government in 1981. They desperately needed artillery to out-range the enemy in the protracted Iran-Iraq War. The association allowed Bull to yet again seek sponsorship of a space-launch supergun. Sadam Hussein liked the idea, and Project Babylon was born. Throughout the 1980's Bull's dealings with Iraq had the covert approval of Western governments, who saw Iraq as a counterweight to revolutionary Iran.
In March of 1988, Bull received a contract to build two full sized 'Project Babylon' 1000 mm superguns and one 'Baby Babylon' 350 mm prototype for a total of $25 million. The project was given the cover designation 'PC-2' (Petrochemical Complex-2). British engineer Christopher Cowley was the project manager.
The greatest concern by the international community was Iraq's arsenal of guns developed by Gerald Bull from mid-1981 until he was assassinated by what was believed to be Israeli intelligence on 22 March 1990. Two hundred of these guns, termed GH-N-45 were manufactured in Austria and were shipped to Iraq via Jordan in 1985 for use in the Iran-Iraq war. The remaining 100 were manufactured in South Africa, where they are marketed under the name G-5. The G-5 can deliver a tactical nuclear warhead, chemical shells or any NATO standard 155mm shell.
It is my intentions in this series of articles to explain just how corrupt and two faced governments can become whereby they install or support a west friendly President to carry out their own hidden agenda. In this case Saddam was one such President that had the full support of both the US and UK governments with the intention of keeping the Iraq/ Iran war running as long as possible. This next paragraph explains what was going on at the time. At a later date we would see two inquiries emerge one being the Scott Inquiry and also the Matrix Churchill inquiry both of which became a total farce and government cover – up with the latter beings scuppered by the British Government before it even got underway.
The following is an extraction of an article highlighting UK’s involvement in the supergun affair: Iraq used the petrochemical complex two (PC-2) project as a front to purchase components for Gerald Bull's super gun. Matrix Churchill was a long established Midlands based machine tool manufacturer which was purchased in 1987 by an Iraqi controlled company, TMG Engineering Ltd, which was in turn controlled by another Iraqi controlled company, Technology and Development Group Ltd (TDG). The military uses of Matrix-Churchill machines are the prime reason Iraq was interested in purchasing the company. Acquiring Matrix-Churchill gave Iraq access, not only to the machine tools, but also the computer programming, tooling, and other components needed to make a wide variety of munitions as well as other applications in aerospace and nuclear industries. The Iraqi NASSR Establishment for Mechanical Industries contracted with the company for the supply of machine tools for a project, code named "ABA", to manufacture parts for multi launcher rocket systems. In addition, supergun components were fabricated in separate parts by factories in England (Forgemasters in Sheffield), Spain, Holland and Switzerland. Acting on an anonymous tip, British Customs seized the final eight sections of the Super Gun in November 1990. The work skirted the law but remained legal, as illustrated by Britain's unsuccessful prosecution of the case, following the joint British-American sting operation that uncovered key supergun equipment transfers.
The background to this article was created to Tara Davison who dealt with intelligence matters/investigations at the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and who became a whistleblower on the illegal arms trade carried out by the British Government, especially in the Middle East. When one links this scam with the nuclear weapons deal in South Africa one can clearly see that the respective leaders and their governments will do anything to either encourage conflict or to elongate a war in order to gain financial reward for themselves or their political party. I will return to some aspects of Tara Davison’s account later on in this mini series.
It should also be noted that when certain incidents happen to get into the media the leaders and their government would suddenly duck for cover and embark on covering up their tracks as soon as possible. However, sadly this also entailed the removal of key witnesses by well planned assassinations or the imprisonment of others so as not to allow the vital evidence to reach the court or a public enquiry. Three examples being the arrest and imprisonment of key British figures involved in the super gun deal, the assassination of the designer, Gerald Bull, followed by the South African nuclear weapons scam and the assassination of Dr David Kelly to protect those in high places which I will be covering in part 2 of this series.
As I have pointed out that once the media get their teeth into such scams, all hell lets loose. On such report by the BBC appeared in 1990 and said the following: Customs seize 'supergun.' Customs officers in Middlesbrough say they have seized what they believe to be the barrel of a massive gun on a ship bound for Iraq.
Exports of parts for a weapon to Iraq would contravene British restrictions on arms sales to President Saddam Hussein's state. Eight pipes were found in crates during a search of the ship at the Teesport Docks. The length of the barrel is said to measure 40 metres (130 feet) when assembled. This would make it by far the largest gun in the world with a range of approximately 600 miles (965 kilometres). The ship where the pipes were found, the Gur Mariner, is being chartered by the Iraqi Maritime Organisation.
The main issue I am trying to raise in my articles is the fact that the leaders and governments on both sides of the pond have been and continue to pull the wool over our eyes to cover up their evil covert ways of manipulating the Geo Politics of this planet. They encourage conflict in order to become involved in areas of hostility such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia etc. They also covertly distribute arms illegally, which in some cases are used against our own forces or those of our allies. The arms manufacturing business is one of the most lucrative in the world and conflict or wars turns over huge amounts of money…….it also has the ability to increase the price of oil and gas which also props up the companies they own. One must also remember that in amongst this mass deceit are private deals going on to which they themselves benefit from or that attract huge sums of money for their own political party to enhance an election or a particular candidate. We will cover one such case later.
One point I would like to make in regard to the pre arranged assassinations of Gerald Bull and Dr David Kelly is to ask the question “Where is the true axis of evil and at what level are they prepared to go”? We all fully understand they are both linked to illegal arms deals (Super Gun and South African nukes) and that very senior politicians were implicated.. We could also ask some questions about the death of Robin Cooke (Ex British Foreign Minister) and also Michael Todd (Ex Manchester Police Chief) both of whom had some very strong views……the list is endless…….we could also add to this the crash of the Chinook helicopter that mysteriously crashed on the Mull of Kintyre in Scotland with 25 high level security and intelligence experts from Northern Ireland onboard. One should have some serious concerns that the Chinook Inquiry was a cover up by Ministry of Defence with the involvement of the DTI and the British Secret Service.
Anyway let’s get back to the main story and talk about another evil episode relating to Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW): The following is an extraction from another report regarding more government cover ups: On 11 April 1994 the ambassadors of the US and UK met with President De Klerk. According to Ambassador Princeton Lyman of the United States, who was present during these meetings, the US and UK were concerned that the South African CBW information was “in danger of being acquired by other states, in particular Libya, and that South African scientists could be recruited by these states.
Lyman recalls that after the 1994 election the US and UK waited for De Klerk to brief President Mandela. They believed that this briefing had to take place before Mandela’s inauguration. Five days before the inauguration, when the briefing had not taken place, the US “alerted Thabo Mbeki that there was a proliferation matter of great concern that we [the US and UK] would need to address
The continued trips undertaken by Wouter Basson (cardiologist and former head of the country's secret chemical and biological warfare “Project Coast”) to Libya were still a matter of concern to the US and UK. In January 1995 a third démarche was brought by the governments of the US and UK. Dr Graham Pearson, former Director-General of the UK Defence Ministry’s Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment at Porton Down, who was present during the meetings that followed, said that the intention of the démarche was to request the South African government to provide a credible CBM statement to the BTWC. He said that no comment was made about the nature of the programme and no questions were asked about it. Lyman records that the most difficult issue of the meeting was Basson’s travels to Libya and elsewhere.
It was also revealed that government bodies were united in their wish to prevent public exposure of the programme and were warned of the threat the hearing posed to foreign relations, not least because documents relating to the 1993 and 1994 démarches of the US and UK were found in the trunks. It was argued that if details of these demarches (political protests) were to emerge, trust between the three countries (US, UK and South Africa) would be severely compromised.
The government hoped for a cancellation of the hearing, or at the very least an agreement that the hearing would be conducted in camera. Neither of which were acceptable to the Commission. Finally, in a bid to reduce the potential damage the hearing could cause to foreign relations, the government insisted that a rigorous process be undertaken to identify and approve the documents which could be used in the hearing. A policy was agreed upon: not to make public any documents that could provide technical information to potential proliferators, and the documents pertaining to the démarches would not be made public.
It has often been questioned whether the South Africa programme does indeed offer internationally applicable lessons when measured against the biological weapons and/or chemical programmes of Iraq, the United States, the Soviet Union and Japan which were several orders of magnitude larger and were aimed at the development of large-scale biological weapons for conventional use.
There is evidence to indicate that the intelligence agencies of at least the United States, the United Kingdom and Switzerland were aware of the SADF’s interest in chemical and biological warfare and were aware of Basson’s role in the programme from the early 1980s. Despite being states parties to the Biological and Toxins Weapons Convention (BTWC) these states chose not to confront the apartheid government with their suspicions about treaty violation until shortly before the 1994 elections because they were neither threatened by the programme nor had much to gain politically from calling Pretoria to account
It should also be noted that a Dr William Augerson (US deputy assistant Secretary of Defence for health resources and programmes), according to Basson’s notes, issued a statement indicating that the USA “does in fact do offensive research/have and offensive research capacity” and that “he [Augerson] states that any country with a chemical industry should be able to produce offensive chemicals.” Basson also credits Augerson with the opinion that, “chemical attack is an ideal tactical weapon against terrorist organisations”
The US and UK clearly knew enough about the South African CBW program to judge that the CBM submitted by South Africa was inaccurate (why else would they have been concerned about Basson’s contact with Libya?). Why, then, did the US and UK choose to do and say nothing to prevent the South African CBW program from continuing during the 1980s and early 1990s? The answer to this question probably lies in US policy towards South Africa during the Cold War.
To conclude: the main intention of this mini series is to reveal just how corrupt and deceitful our respective leaders, ministers and governments officials have been. It will reveal that behind the scenes it breaches UN resolutions, embargoes, illegal arms trading and frequently encourages/enhances conflict.
Both sides of the pond frequently use the term “The Axis of Evil” and yet when one gets the opportunity to investigate this spider’s web of deceit we can see the evil that’s exist deep within the corridors of power. It became clear that back in the days of Maggie Thatcher and right up to the current time that what we read about and what actually goes on is truly beyond words.
It is apparent that our respective governments and intelligence services create their many false flags to take us to war to either enhance their own position in this crazy geo political world or to control their own hidden agenda of seeking to control the world’s resources and markets and at the same time protect the drugs that play such a lucrative part in our economy.
It is also an act of treason and a breach of the Geneva Convention that our governments put not only the populations of the world at risk but also that of our military forces by using WMD’s that they knowingly contaminate with radiation nano particles.
Part two of this mini series will continue with more of this deceit when we cover detail of the loss of the South African nuclear weapons, the illegal arms trade and the manipulation of our governments by those that brush their palms with significant amounts of money. One could also include the current Naomi Campbell “Blood Diamond” cover up whereby it was a known fact that diamonds were exchanged for arms from South Africa which in turn fuelled conflict in Liberia and Sierra Leone. It should also be remembered that Charles Taylor who remains at the centre of the current War Crimes Trial was aided and abetted by the CIA in the US….now you can see just how sordid this whole arms dealing becomes. It all comes down to the fact; can you trust your leaders and their governments? We already know the answer to this question.
Keep watching this space for the truth and remember yet again those words of Ghandi: "When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS."
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 12/8/2010
Tuesday, 6 July 2010
Gen. David Petraeus takeover speech hypocritical
What really astounded me were his opening comments when he made the following statement “We are engaged in a contest of wills. Our enemies are doing all that they can to undermine the confidence of the Afghan people. In so doing, they are killing and maiming innocent Afghan civilians on a daily basis.”
From my perspective I would like to remind Gen. Petraeus of the genocide being inflicted on the people of Afghanistan by US and coalition forces as a direct result of their extensive use of weapons that contain uranium components. I would also add to this the fact that the US military themselves used Tactical Nuclear Weapons also with extremely dire consequences.
Lets just reflect for one moment on this very thoughtless action (or should I say well planned action) inflicted on not only the people of Afghanistan but also in all the downwind countries and beyond. I would like to refresh your memory on the implications and usage of these weapons.
When they use Depleted Uranium the highly radioactive nano particles immediately drift around the region, cross international border and eventually the world.
We also know they used Tactical Nuclear Weapons such as the B61 bomb (Dial up low yield) on locations in the Tora Bora Mountains in North East Afghanistan. This is a war crime of gigantic proportions and will have far reaching effects on millions of people in a totally indiscriminate way.
So what are the implications for a dial up nuclear weapon? The B61 -11: Tactical or strategic bomb has multiple yield options presumably ranging from 10 Kt (and possibly lower yields) to 340 Kt. What does this mean as far as casualties and the environment?
A single warhead, set on 1 kiloton, will penetrate into the ground and spread 60,000 tons of radioactive debris. The radioactive fallout will spread throughout the planet and lead to many more casualties. Pentagon models project, in the 1 kiloton scenario that 3 million people would die, mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. 35 million people would also be exposed to cancer causing radiation. If the same warhead is set to 100 kilotons, it will emit 1.5 million tons of radioactive debris into the atmosphere. The fatalities from that scenario are unknown but obviously would be of gigantic proportions.
There have been many concerns about the US current policy with weapons that appears to be hidden from the public eye. The current push by Obama on the NPT plan is totally flawed and is hiding the hidden agenda on the extensive use of weapons containing Depleted Uranium components, other “High Tech Dirty Bombs” and Tactical Nuclear Weapons as required. Many of these weapons are sent to existing areas of conflict for testing, followed up by experts who then carry out an analysis on the impact of such weapons in the region concerned.
The Brookings Institute in the US made the following statement:
The United States is now fielding a new tactical and strategic nuclear military capability that has already been used to threaten a non-nuclear country. This new capability was certified without nuclear testing, using an existing surrogate testing facility with capabilities much less than those under construction and planned. The weapon was developed and deployed in secret, without public and congressional debate, contrary to domestic and international assurances that no new nuclear weapons were being developed. Other new or "modified" nuclear weapons, earth-penetrating and otherwise, are planned.
One can also clearly see the US totally supporting Israel who now has a totally out of control research programme an also has a very impressive stockpile of WMD’s. It has (like its partner in crime the US) been testing its weapons on Lebanon (2006) and more recently in Gaza 2008/9. The following is an extract from the Brookings Institute and clearly shows that the US is truly playing games with such countries as Iran and North Korea when it is itself violating the very principles of the NPT:
• Concerns
• The B61-11's unique earth-penetrating characteristics, not to mention its wide range of yields, allow it to threaten otherwise indestructible targets from the air and are its raison d'etre. The new weapon is uniquely useful from a military perspective? And hence provocative from an arms control and nonproliferation perspective.
• A central and expressed purpose of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) has always been to arrest the further evolution of the world's nuclear arsenals. This modified weapon? Certified without nuclear testing and deployed after signing the CTBT? Undercuts that treaty and could provide political cover to countries which have their own unsatisfied nuclear ambitions.
• Earth-penetrating weapons, deployed by the Clinton administration in the post-Cold-War era, were rejected for deployment by Presidents Carter, Reagan, and Bush. What is the new reason to deploy these weapons? What are the new targets? What is known about the B61-11 strongly suggests that its rushed development has been motivated by a desire to target one or more non-nuclear-weapon states.
• On July 8, 1996, the International Court of Justice ruled that any use or threat of use of nuclear weapons, other than possibly in the case where the very survival of a nation was threatened, was against international law. After this landmark decision, it is difficult to legally support the deployment, let alone the new development, of any tactical nuclear weapon? Especially one whose development appears to have been motivated by a desire to target non-nuclear weapon states.
• In order to gain support for indefinite extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the United States repeatedly assured the world during April and May of 1995 that it would not continue "vertical proliferation." Yet during these same months the Department of Energy (DOE) was seeking, and obtaining, approval for a weapon modification with significant new military utility.
• Development of this weapon was approved outside the regular budget process and without congressional debate, by means of secret letters to key committee chairmen, raising constitutional questions.
• In their efforts to gain acceptance for the advanced surrogate testing of the "science-based stockpile stewardship" program, Clinton administration officials and nuclear weapons laboratory spokespersons have for years assured a skeptical public that no new nuclear weapons would be developed or built. At the very same time, secret development of this provocative weapon was being requested by the Department of Defense (DoD) and carried out by the DOE in complete secrecy.
• The DOE claims that this weapon, with its unique new military characteristics, is not a new weapon but rather a minor modification of an existing weapon. Lab spokespersons admit that other "modifications" are now in the works or planned for the future. What are these?
• The current B61 modification allegedly involves only the nonnuclear components of the bomb (notwithstanding months of effort at Los Alamos National Laboratory [LANL]). Yet the labs maintain that in the future, modifications to the nuclear components will definitely be made and certified as well, using computer simulations and surrogate tests. Since none of the modifications can be explosively proof-tested, why won't "confidence" in the reliability of U.S. nuclear weapons decrease under these plans? Unfortunately, allowing such changes to be made will likely result, over time, in calls for the resumption of nuclear testing.
• Continued modification of the U.S. stockpile is expensive. While this particular project may or may not be expensive in itself, the DOE's $3 billion construction plans for new nuclear test simulators, along with its planned Cold-War-level nuclear weapons program funding, is largely driven by the proclaimed "need" to maintain the capability to develop new warheads and bombs. These DOE expenses, it must be said, are just a fraction of the $26 billion spent annually by the U.S. to field and maintain its nuclear arsenal.
• For these reasons and others, new or "modified" nuclear weapons like the B61-11 are not in the security interests of the United States. On the contrary, it is in our manifest interest to get rid of such weapons as fast as possible and to end their further legitimization, as the former commander of the United States Strategic Command, General George Lee Butler, and others have recently said.
When one adds to this the fact that since the start of 2009 the US Military has been secretly double up on its stockpiles in other countries such as Israel and Guam etc. This is the new policy for the US Military which they call “Lilly Pad Bases.” and benefits the US in so many ways:
• Because this is classified as an internal US military transfer from one US base to another no clearance for such weapons need to pass though Congress.
• The new policy allows the host country to use the stockpile for its own security as required
• Forms a strategic staging post for other actions such as a possible attack on Iran
Back to Gen. Petraeus speech…….he went on to say “No tactic is beneath the insurgents; indeed, they use unwitting children to carry out attacks, they repeatedly kill innocent civilians, and they frequently seek to create situations that will result in injury to Afghan citizens.”
“In answer, we must demonstrate to the people and to the Taliban that Afghan and ISAF forces are here to safeguard the Afghan people, and that we are in this to win. That is our clear objective.”
Perhaps I would ask Petraeus how he compares the above two sentences to the fact that as a direct result of US actions by using these WMD they have killed the genetics of Afghanistan with long term suffering that is beyond words. This evil depopulation plan has gone well beyond the battlefields of the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Lebanon, Somalia and Yemen with equally devastating implications on the entire world. These wars are nothing to do with bringing democracy to the countries concerned but rather all about controlling the world’s resources and their associated lucrative markets.
The only reason our street remain unsafe is because of our greed and determination to grab someone else’s resources or alternatively to stop them from obtaining their own world markets that remain outside of US/Western control. This is the true face of war and the sooner all western forces return to their native countries the sooner terrorism will cease. These wars cost all our respective countries trillions of dollars and it is obvious that if they did not exist our economy would be much stronger.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant - 6th July 2010
From my perspective I would like to remind Gen. Petraeus of the genocide being inflicted on the people of Afghanistan by US and coalition forces as a direct result of their extensive use of weapons that contain uranium components. I would also add to this the fact that the US military themselves used Tactical Nuclear Weapons also with extremely dire consequences.
Lets just reflect for one moment on this very thoughtless action (or should I say well planned action) inflicted on not only the people of Afghanistan but also in all the downwind countries and beyond. I would like to refresh your memory on the implications and usage of these weapons.
When they use Depleted Uranium the highly radioactive nano particles immediately drift around the region, cross international border and eventually the world.
We also know they used Tactical Nuclear Weapons such as the B61 bomb (Dial up low yield) on locations in the Tora Bora Mountains in North East Afghanistan. This is a war crime of gigantic proportions and will have far reaching effects on millions of people in a totally indiscriminate way.
So what are the implications for a dial up nuclear weapon? The B61 -11: Tactical or strategic bomb has multiple yield options presumably ranging from 10 Kt (and possibly lower yields) to 340 Kt. What does this mean as far as casualties and the environment?
A single warhead, set on 1 kiloton, will penetrate into the ground and spread 60,000 tons of radioactive debris. The radioactive fallout will spread throughout the planet and lead to many more casualties. Pentagon models project, in the 1 kiloton scenario that 3 million people would die, mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. 35 million people would also be exposed to cancer causing radiation. If the same warhead is set to 100 kilotons, it will emit 1.5 million tons of radioactive debris into the atmosphere. The fatalities from that scenario are unknown but obviously would be of gigantic proportions.
There have been many concerns about the US current policy with weapons that appears to be hidden from the public eye. The current push by Obama on the NPT plan is totally flawed and is hiding the hidden agenda on the extensive use of weapons containing Depleted Uranium components, other “High Tech Dirty Bombs” and Tactical Nuclear Weapons as required. Many of these weapons are sent to existing areas of conflict for testing, followed up by experts who then carry out an analysis on the impact of such weapons in the region concerned.
The Brookings Institute in the US made the following statement:
The United States is now fielding a new tactical and strategic nuclear military capability that has already been used to threaten a non-nuclear country. This new capability was certified without nuclear testing, using an existing surrogate testing facility with capabilities much less than those under construction and planned. The weapon was developed and deployed in secret, without public and congressional debate, contrary to domestic and international assurances that no new nuclear weapons were being developed. Other new or "modified" nuclear weapons, earth-penetrating and otherwise, are planned.
One can also clearly see the US totally supporting Israel who now has a totally out of control research programme an also has a very impressive stockpile of WMD’s. It has (like its partner in crime the US) been testing its weapons on Lebanon (2006) and more recently in Gaza 2008/9. The following is an extract from the Brookings Institute and clearly shows that the US is truly playing games with such countries as Iran and North Korea when it is itself violating the very principles of the NPT:
• Concerns
• The B61-11's unique earth-penetrating characteristics, not to mention its wide range of yields, allow it to threaten otherwise indestructible targets from the air and are its raison d'etre. The new weapon is uniquely useful from a military perspective? And hence provocative from an arms control and nonproliferation perspective.
• A central and expressed purpose of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) has always been to arrest the further evolution of the world's nuclear arsenals. This modified weapon? Certified without nuclear testing and deployed after signing the CTBT? Undercuts that treaty and could provide political cover to countries which have their own unsatisfied nuclear ambitions.
• Earth-penetrating weapons, deployed by the Clinton administration in the post-Cold-War era, were rejected for deployment by Presidents Carter, Reagan, and Bush. What is the new reason to deploy these weapons? What are the new targets? What is known about the B61-11 strongly suggests that its rushed development has been motivated by a desire to target one or more non-nuclear-weapon states.
• On July 8, 1996, the International Court of Justice ruled that any use or threat of use of nuclear weapons, other than possibly in the case where the very survival of a nation was threatened, was against international law. After this landmark decision, it is difficult to legally support the deployment, let alone the new development, of any tactical nuclear weapon? Especially one whose development appears to have been motivated by a desire to target non-nuclear weapon states.
• In order to gain support for indefinite extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the United States repeatedly assured the world during April and May of 1995 that it would not continue "vertical proliferation." Yet during these same months the Department of Energy (DOE) was seeking, and obtaining, approval for a weapon modification with significant new military utility.
• Development of this weapon was approved outside the regular budget process and without congressional debate, by means of secret letters to key committee chairmen, raising constitutional questions.
• In their efforts to gain acceptance for the advanced surrogate testing of the "science-based stockpile stewardship" program, Clinton administration officials and nuclear weapons laboratory spokespersons have for years assured a skeptical public that no new nuclear weapons would be developed or built. At the very same time, secret development of this provocative weapon was being requested by the Department of Defense (DoD) and carried out by the DOE in complete secrecy.
• The DOE claims that this weapon, with its unique new military characteristics, is not a new weapon but rather a minor modification of an existing weapon. Lab spokespersons admit that other "modifications" are now in the works or planned for the future. What are these?
• The current B61 modification allegedly involves only the nonnuclear components of the bomb (notwithstanding months of effort at Los Alamos National Laboratory [LANL]). Yet the labs maintain that in the future, modifications to the nuclear components will definitely be made and certified as well, using computer simulations and surrogate tests. Since none of the modifications can be explosively proof-tested, why won't "confidence" in the reliability of U.S. nuclear weapons decrease under these plans? Unfortunately, allowing such changes to be made will likely result, over time, in calls for the resumption of nuclear testing.
• Continued modification of the U.S. stockpile is expensive. While this particular project may or may not be expensive in itself, the DOE's $3 billion construction plans for new nuclear test simulators, along with its planned Cold-War-level nuclear weapons program funding, is largely driven by the proclaimed "need" to maintain the capability to develop new warheads and bombs. These DOE expenses, it must be said, are just a fraction of the $26 billion spent annually by the U.S. to field and maintain its nuclear arsenal.
• For these reasons and others, new or "modified" nuclear weapons like the B61-11 are not in the security interests of the United States. On the contrary, it is in our manifest interest to get rid of such weapons as fast as possible and to end their further legitimization, as the former commander of the United States Strategic Command, General George Lee Butler, and others have recently said.
When one adds to this the fact that since the start of 2009 the US Military has been secretly double up on its stockpiles in other countries such as Israel and Guam etc. This is the new policy for the US Military which they call “Lilly Pad Bases.” and benefits the US in so many ways:
• Because this is classified as an internal US military transfer from one US base to another no clearance for such weapons need to pass though Congress.
• The new policy allows the host country to use the stockpile for its own security as required
• Forms a strategic staging post for other actions such as a possible attack on Iran
Back to Gen. Petraeus speech…….he went on to say “No tactic is beneath the insurgents; indeed, they use unwitting children to carry out attacks, they repeatedly kill innocent civilians, and they frequently seek to create situations that will result in injury to Afghan citizens.”
“In answer, we must demonstrate to the people and to the Taliban that Afghan and ISAF forces are here to safeguard the Afghan people, and that we are in this to win. That is our clear objective.”
Perhaps I would ask Petraeus how he compares the above two sentences to the fact that as a direct result of US actions by using these WMD they have killed the genetics of Afghanistan with long term suffering that is beyond words. This evil depopulation plan has gone well beyond the battlefields of the Balkans, Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Lebanon, Somalia and Yemen with equally devastating implications on the entire world. These wars are nothing to do with bringing democracy to the countries concerned but rather all about controlling the world’s resources and their associated lucrative markets.
The only reason our street remain unsafe is because of our greed and determination to grab someone else’s resources or alternatively to stop them from obtaining their own world markets that remain outside of US/Western control. This is the true face of war and the sooner all western forces return to their native countries the sooner terrorism will cease. These wars cost all our respective countries trillions of dollars and it is obvious that if they did not exist our economy would be much stronger.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant - 6th July 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
