Part 4 - What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher’s Watch?
I have already discussed in Part 3 of this series how the British Government manage d to acquire 3 ready- to- use nuclear bombs from Pelindaba under the nose of the United Nations. These three nukes were part of a total consignment of 9 that were destined to travel from South Africa to Chicago in the US. It became apparent that Maggie Thatcher had made an arrangement with the Government of South Africa and the United Station for three of these be acquired and shipped to Oman for storage. The main purpose was to have these weapons on stand-by for possible use on Iraq.
These weapons were then shipped in standard 20 foot containers and manifested as metal cylinders and not nuclear weapons. This would have been in violation of international regulations regarding the shipment of dangerous good. The weapons were then placed into private storage in Oman and left for Dr.David Kelly to carry out an inspection in order to accept the consignment prior to final payment. Dr David Kelly was the only person in mainstream UK MOD tasked with being in the loop for that covert offshore procurement of battlefield nukes from Apartheid South Africa.
Dr Kelly did carry out that inspection and final payment was made by the British Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) using money from the Ministry of Defence (MOD). This process was a direct breach of normal protocol in the purchase of munitions, even more so with the fact that this was money being paid to the private sector.
Sometime after Dr Kelly had inspected the three weapons they apparently went missing. It became apparent that when these weapons were no longer required they continued on their journey to Chicago and when the containers were offloaded and checked, it was found to contain only concrete and not bombs! So what happened to the security system for looking after such dangerous weapons and how did the switch take place?
It would appear that three trucks with containers onboard left the private storage facility and were replaced with three trucks and containers that only contained concrete. We must fully understand that these operational nuclear weapons were highly mobile and did not present any problem. It became apparent that these weapons did in actual fact end up in Iraq and it was believed that this formed part of the final intelligence brief leading up to the war.
Prior to the outbreak of the war these three weapons were transported to Syria in three separate ambulances as they were extremely mobile (as we have already discussed). What happened to these weapons after that is anyone’s guess but one could associate an attack by the Israeli Air Force on the Syrian Nuclear Facilities in 2007 a possible clue.
What did transpire after the war was that the British Government found out that these weapons had in actual fact left Iraq prior to the war but did not reveal this to the rest of the world. Likewise both the US and UK kept this entire fiasco top secret from the eyes of the United Nations and their respective media etc.
Before looking into who knew what and who received what let’s just make it clear that this war in Iraq had a main focus of establishing a regime change. It was Bush’s intention right from the onset and Tony Blair was very much aware of the US stance and also agreed with it. The Secret Downing Street Memo proved beyond a shadow of doubt that whatever the outcome the US and UK would end up going for the final option of a regime change.
Finally we come to the question of how much money was placed into the Conservative Party Funds for their 1992 election campaign (as a direct result of this nuke deal). We already know that Tony Blair got a 1 million pound bonus which was disguised as a donation from the tobacco industry but what about the Tory Party?
Tory funding of their 1992 General Election Campaign –
Origins of Mystery Donation of £17.8 millions:
If we can recall HANSARD 22nd June 1993 we can find the following:
Column 197
Mr. Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In 1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company accounts.
I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 million was shown in company accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million. We want to know where that £17.8 million came from.
It is very clear where this money came from as well as the token offer given to Blair.
Right from the onset a small group of people in both the US and UK knew of this deal and how the weapons that the British Taxpayer had paid for had gone missing. On this side of the Pond we can be rest assured that the following people knew: Thatcher (Mother and Son Mark), David Cameron, the nobleman with the initials of KW, John Major and his senior guys. On the Labour Party side of the fence it would have been Tony Blair and his close team followed by Gordon Brown. As we already know Thatcher put in an appearance at Number 10 Downing Street when they both came into office…..once can assume it was not to congratulate them!
We now have to ask some serious questions……did we go to war for these weapons (WMD) and if so then all those involved in this charade must be guilty of not only gross neglect but also for the unnecessary lost of millions of people(Including troops). Everyone knows the money is blood money and everyone knows that nothing will be done about this incident. How can we truly vote for any of these monsters who knew an awful lot but kept it to themselves? What we can see here is the fact that the tax payers money was not only totally abused, but some of it ended up in the party fund election drive. How corrupt can one become?
It was interesting to hear the reason for David Cameron going to South Africa. His office insisted the visit by the 23-year-old future leader was a "fact-finding mission" that took place 20 years ago, and the Thatcher government was opposed to sanctions against South Africa at the time. I think we can assume it was to do with the “Nuke Deal” before the regime change and also to raise money for party funds!
Perhaps when you vote next time you will hesitate before ticking the box?
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 5/3/2010
Friday, 5 March 2010
Thursday, 4 March 2010
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each!
Part 3 - What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher’s Watch?
As we have discussed in Part 2 of this current series many countries were involved in extremely disturbing activities and this was spearheaded by certain leaders and their senior staff members. It has clearly shown a trail of unbelievable corruption and gross neglect without any due concern as to the consequences of their actions.
So lets again visit the circumstance of the deal between the UK Government under Maggie Thatcher, the David Cameron entourage, the South African Government and the ruthless arms dealers. I would also like you to keep in mind the connection between the missing US Nuclear Missiles and the same shonky arms dealers.
First we must again identify the fact that there were originally 10 nuclear weapons and out of this batch one was tested, leaving 9 weapons in total. David Cameron went down to South Africa in 1989 to look into many aspects of the WMD programme. At the same time Dr David Kelly was very much involved in the CBW programme having had several visits with his South African counterparts. He was also knowledgeable about the weapons smuggling loop that existed in Africa. This also gave him access to the nuclear weapons proliferation programme in South Africa, especially South African nuclear bombs assembled with the help of Israeli nuclear scientists at the covert South African nuclear weapons facility at Pelindaba nuclear research facility, near Pretoria.We will see how Dr. Kelly became involved in the nuke transfer further on in this article.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors who visited Pelindaba and the state-owned Armaments Corporation of South Africa (ARMSCOR) Advena nuclear facility near Pretoria in 1990 and 1991 were tricked into believing that South Africa's nuclear weapons had all been dismantled by the outgoing apartheid regime. However what they didn’t know is that after they had left South Africa things continued on as normal. I again repeat that both the US and UK Governments were very much aware of the existence of these weapons with Maggie Thatcher rubbing her hands together in preparation of receiving a significant contribution to party funds……..David Cameron and his sidekicks also were very much part of these shady goings on!
Now we come to the deal of getting the weapons out of South Africa, how they were transported and where they ended up. Let me remind you that we are talking here about three armed – ready to use – nuclear bombs courtesy of the Israeli technicians that had worked on this project. We can then look at who was involved, how the payments were made and how they eventually went missing.
The plan was originally to re locate these weapons to some remote railway sidings and then to load them into 3 standard 20 foot ISO containers (one bomb per container) and export them with a false manifest showing them as metal cylinders. The main players in this were a British Company called Astra and a South African Company called ARMSCOR. At Government level it would be dealt with primarily by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) who would use MOD money. This alone gives some indication as to why this deal became so very special and confidential. One must also include the middle man in this entire deal who would bring all parties together and get the job done. To name names obviously the “Iron Lady” is right in there and also her son Mark Thatcher, then we have David Cameron and that illustrious man who accompanied him to South Africa with the initials KW. The middle man and notorious arms dealer was John Bredenkemp. We also have to add John Major into the story as he also became part of this shonky deal.
In order to keep this out of Parliament and out of the public domain Maggie Thatcher was asked to sign off these weapons under a special Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) and was shown as metal cylinders and not nuclear bombs. This was done completely under the table and this knowledge was not known to anyone else. This document was signed before she left office in late 1990.
The next phase was that once the weapons had left South African soil then the British Government would reimburse ARMSCOR (The South African Arms Trading Company), Astra (The British arms company) and the middle man John Bredenkemp……compliments of the British Tax Payer.
It should be noted here that ARMSCOR has now split and the arms side has now become a company called Denel (Pty) Ltd…basically they both work together. ARMSCOR advertise themselves as “Gateway to Defence Solutions” and Denel has branched out into a diverse empire covering Aviation, Weapons and systems etc.
So to recap we have 9 nuclear weapons in transit to Chicago, USA and 3 of those were to be used as a standby weapon for the Gulf War, These three were sent for storage to Oman where Dr. Kelly would carry out an inspection and safety check and upon completion the money would be paid to all those involved.
We must understand that this deal was all processed via the private sector which I find incredible to believe when one fully understands the implications of buying, selling and shipping ready to use nuclear weapons! What we see here is three South African nuclear weapons sold to "private investors"!
.
These containers were specially adapted to carry these highly mobile weapons from South Africa to a private storage facility in Oman for safekeeping. The containers had a special seal on the lock of the rear door of each container along with a temperature gauge in the front of the containers that was connected to the core of the bombs to indicate that the bomb was not overheating inside the containers.
The nuclear smuggling operations involved top members of the British Conservative Party, including individuals close to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, her son Mark as we have already said and at a later date other members of the Labour Party. Both parties received an increase in party funds with Conservative taking a massive share. One has to keep in mind the fact that their presence in South Africa was totally in violation of the embargo and also in violation of Nuclear Explosions Act
As for John Bredenkemp one cannot even attempt to calculate how much entered his wallet but as one normally expect this money is very quickly converted in gold bullion amounting to many kilos.
We will next look into what happened to these weapons once they had been placed in storage in Oman and how the British Taxpayer donated money for a very unprofessional operation that failed from the onset. Needless to say the nukes all went missing and one can clearly see that indirectly the taxpayer’s money ended up in the Party Politic Funds of both the Labour Party and Conservative Party.
Many investigations have taken place since this event, all of which are interconnected. Jonathan Aitken a Tory Party Defence Minister, Gerald Bull a Canadian who worked with Saddam, Gerald James Chairman of Astra and others. It became apparent just how sensitive thinks had become when Alan Clark the DTI Minister became involved as did Sir Ken Warren who was Chairman of Trade and Industry. The spiders web certainly implicated Tony Blair with his connections with Bernie Eccelstone who had managed to pop one million pounds as a donation to the Labour Party which was disguised as coming from the tobacco industry when in actual fact it was clearly from the gun running episode.
Tony Blair upon becoming Prime Minister in 1997 tried unsuccessfully to return the money to Bernie Ecclestone. This party donation was only a fraction of what the Tory Party received. All in all the tax payers money was fuelling the arms trade to both Iraq and Iran with the British Government at its heart. It is clear that both parties were all playing the same game and the end result certainly led to these weapons being used against our own forces, which frequently occurs around the world.
Tomorrow we see the commencement of the Iraq Inquiry…….yes folks another waste of tax payers money……will it bear fruit?.... I don’t think so!
What we have to remember is that both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both summoned Maggie Thatcher to their office after taking office and one can only imagine that the missing nukes must play a major part of the discussion that were held within. That is why this inquiry has failed before it even started like all the others. The period of coverage does not go back far enough for it to become effective. The missing nukes play a major part in this inquiry but in actual fact is not part of its remit.
To date we have had two assassinations that of Gerald Bull who was assassinated by Mossad in Brussels in 1990 and our own dear Dr. David Kelly. Alan Clarke died of a brain tumor in 1999 and that just left Gerald James. The latter had a brush with death at the end of last year but they got one of his relatives purely by accident. When one looks at such inquires as the Matrix Churchill arms smuggling scandal we can clearly see how such inquiries fail. It is interesting to see such people as Ken Macdonald become a partner in Matrix Chambers who also happens to partner with Cheryl Blair….one can see that by its name and implications it is teasing those who only wanted to see true British justice take place……so lets see what Brown churns up tomorrow……..this could be the make him or break him opportunity…..don’t hold your breath!
Stay tuned for the final intriguing episode (Part 4) of this current series.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 4/2/2010
As we have discussed in Part 2 of this current series many countries were involved in extremely disturbing activities and this was spearheaded by certain leaders and their senior staff members. It has clearly shown a trail of unbelievable corruption and gross neglect without any due concern as to the consequences of their actions.
So lets again visit the circumstance of the deal between the UK Government under Maggie Thatcher, the David Cameron entourage, the South African Government and the ruthless arms dealers. I would also like you to keep in mind the connection between the missing US Nuclear Missiles and the same shonky arms dealers.
First we must again identify the fact that there were originally 10 nuclear weapons and out of this batch one was tested, leaving 9 weapons in total. David Cameron went down to South Africa in 1989 to look into many aspects of the WMD programme. At the same time Dr David Kelly was very much involved in the CBW programme having had several visits with his South African counterparts. He was also knowledgeable about the weapons smuggling loop that existed in Africa. This also gave him access to the nuclear weapons proliferation programme in South Africa, especially South African nuclear bombs assembled with the help of Israeli nuclear scientists at the covert South African nuclear weapons facility at Pelindaba nuclear research facility, near Pretoria.We will see how Dr. Kelly became involved in the nuke transfer further on in this article.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors who visited Pelindaba and the state-owned Armaments Corporation of South Africa (ARMSCOR) Advena nuclear facility near Pretoria in 1990 and 1991 were tricked into believing that South Africa's nuclear weapons had all been dismantled by the outgoing apartheid regime. However what they didn’t know is that after they had left South Africa things continued on as normal. I again repeat that both the US and UK Governments were very much aware of the existence of these weapons with Maggie Thatcher rubbing her hands together in preparation of receiving a significant contribution to party funds……..David Cameron and his sidekicks also were very much part of these shady goings on!
Now we come to the deal of getting the weapons out of South Africa, how they were transported and where they ended up. Let me remind you that we are talking here about three armed – ready to use – nuclear bombs courtesy of the Israeli technicians that had worked on this project. We can then look at who was involved, how the payments were made and how they eventually went missing.
The plan was originally to re locate these weapons to some remote railway sidings and then to load them into 3 standard 20 foot ISO containers (one bomb per container) and export them with a false manifest showing them as metal cylinders. The main players in this were a British Company called Astra and a South African Company called ARMSCOR. At Government level it would be dealt with primarily by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) who would use MOD money. This alone gives some indication as to why this deal became so very special and confidential. One must also include the middle man in this entire deal who would bring all parties together and get the job done. To name names obviously the “Iron Lady” is right in there and also her son Mark Thatcher, then we have David Cameron and that illustrious man who accompanied him to South Africa with the initials KW. The middle man and notorious arms dealer was John Bredenkemp. We also have to add John Major into the story as he also became part of this shonky deal.
In order to keep this out of Parliament and out of the public domain Maggie Thatcher was asked to sign off these weapons under a special Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) and was shown as metal cylinders and not nuclear bombs. This was done completely under the table and this knowledge was not known to anyone else. This document was signed before she left office in late 1990.
The next phase was that once the weapons had left South African soil then the British Government would reimburse ARMSCOR (The South African Arms Trading Company), Astra (The British arms company) and the middle man John Bredenkemp……compliments of the British Tax Payer.
It should be noted here that ARMSCOR has now split and the arms side has now become a company called Denel (Pty) Ltd…basically they both work together. ARMSCOR advertise themselves as “Gateway to Defence Solutions” and Denel has branched out into a diverse empire covering Aviation, Weapons and systems etc.
So to recap we have 9 nuclear weapons in transit to Chicago, USA and 3 of those were to be used as a standby weapon for the Gulf War, These three were sent for storage to Oman where Dr. Kelly would carry out an inspection and safety check and upon completion the money would be paid to all those involved.
We must understand that this deal was all processed via the private sector which I find incredible to believe when one fully understands the implications of buying, selling and shipping ready to use nuclear weapons! What we see here is three South African nuclear weapons sold to "private investors"!
.
These containers were specially adapted to carry these highly mobile weapons from South Africa to a private storage facility in Oman for safekeeping. The containers had a special seal on the lock of the rear door of each container along with a temperature gauge in the front of the containers that was connected to the core of the bombs to indicate that the bomb was not overheating inside the containers.
The nuclear smuggling operations involved top members of the British Conservative Party, including individuals close to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, her son Mark as we have already said and at a later date other members of the Labour Party. Both parties received an increase in party funds with Conservative taking a massive share. One has to keep in mind the fact that their presence in South Africa was totally in violation of the embargo and also in violation of Nuclear Explosions Act
As for John Bredenkemp one cannot even attempt to calculate how much entered his wallet but as one normally expect this money is very quickly converted in gold bullion amounting to many kilos.
We will next look into what happened to these weapons once they had been placed in storage in Oman and how the British Taxpayer donated money for a very unprofessional operation that failed from the onset. Needless to say the nukes all went missing and one can clearly see that indirectly the taxpayer’s money ended up in the Party Politic Funds of both the Labour Party and Conservative Party.
Many investigations have taken place since this event, all of which are interconnected. Jonathan Aitken a Tory Party Defence Minister, Gerald Bull a Canadian who worked with Saddam, Gerald James Chairman of Astra and others. It became apparent just how sensitive thinks had become when Alan Clark the DTI Minister became involved as did Sir Ken Warren who was Chairman of Trade and Industry. The spiders web certainly implicated Tony Blair with his connections with Bernie Eccelstone who had managed to pop one million pounds as a donation to the Labour Party which was disguised as coming from the tobacco industry when in actual fact it was clearly from the gun running episode.
Tony Blair upon becoming Prime Minister in 1997 tried unsuccessfully to return the money to Bernie Ecclestone. This party donation was only a fraction of what the Tory Party received. All in all the tax payers money was fuelling the arms trade to both Iraq and Iran with the British Government at its heart. It is clear that both parties were all playing the same game and the end result certainly led to these weapons being used against our own forces, which frequently occurs around the world.
Tomorrow we see the commencement of the Iraq Inquiry…….yes folks another waste of tax payers money……will it bear fruit?.... I don’t think so!
What we have to remember is that both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both summoned Maggie Thatcher to their office after taking office and one can only imagine that the missing nukes must play a major part of the discussion that were held within. That is why this inquiry has failed before it even started like all the others. The period of coverage does not go back far enough for it to become effective. The missing nukes play a major part in this inquiry but in actual fact is not part of its remit.
To date we have had two assassinations that of Gerald Bull who was assassinated by Mossad in Brussels in 1990 and our own dear Dr. David Kelly. Alan Clarke died of a brain tumor in 1999 and that just left Gerald James. The latter had a brush with death at the end of last year but they got one of his relatives purely by accident. When one looks at such inquires as the Matrix Churchill arms smuggling scandal we can clearly see how such inquiries fail. It is interesting to see such people as Ken Macdonald become a partner in Matrix Chambers who also happens to partner with Cheryl Blair….one can see that by its name and implications it is teasing those who only wanted to see true British justice take place……so lets see what Brown churns up tomorrow……..this could be the make him or break him opportunity…..don’t hold your breath!
Stay tuned for the final intriguing episode (Part 4) of this current series.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 4/2/2010
Wednesday, 3 March 2010
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each!
Part 2 - What went missing on Prime Minister Thatcher’s Watch?
As we discussed in Part 1 three nuclear weapons went missing from the US and now our focus must turn to the three that went missing from under the nose of the good old Brit’s. Don’t you think it is ironic that over one million Iraq’s may have died because of our gross neglect? Let’s not also forget the thousands of troops that also died for nothing!
We have to turn the clock back to 1989 when a very young, wet behind the ears, David Cameron broke the stringent embargo on South Africa and paid a quick but purposeful visit to the Deep South. He was also accompanied by another illustrious Conservative figure who had a little bit more technical know how under his belt.
So why did dear Maggie take such a risk in sending her cavalry all the way down to South Africa? Was there something big to look at? Was their an opportunity for some shonky arms dealer to make big money and in turn possible slip a few thousand in the kitty fund of the Conservative Party? You bet there was!
Ok so lets look into this cloak and dagger operation that went terrible wrong and resulted in the assassination of dear Dr. David Kelly (Oh sorry I shouldn’t have let that slip out it was suicide wasn’t it?). Did this implicate David Cameron and his side kick in not only breaking international law but also in high level corruption? Surely no politician would put his reputation at risk, all for the sake of party funds donation?..........you’ve got to be joking; they would sell their mother for much less!
What was going on in South Africa that basically became the source of going to war in Iraq and why haven’t these culprits been punished and who else knew about this British monumental stuff up? Did the British Labour Party also know about this mess that Maggie Thatcher got us into?.....you bet they did……Dear Dr. Kelly also knew in great detail!
It all comes down to a nuclear weapons programme that was kept hidden from the United Nations by both the US and UK governments….starting to get the picture? The South African Government hid an awful lot of extremely nasty stuff from the
world but good old US of A and the UK knew everything….just like partners in crime.
Let’s just turn the clock back a little further at the time when Rhodesia ceased to exist and became Zimbabwe. It was in Rhodesia that Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) were fine tuned and eventually moved lock stock and barrel to South Africa along with its team of experts.
All of this CBW transfer was under the watchful eye of the British Government who approved the transfer….needless to say the US also became tagged to this evil development.
We may find it hard to believe that way back in the 1960’s the Portuguese used Chemical Warfare by poisoning water wells, drugged prisoners and threw them out of aircraft. It is also hard to believe that other evil ways were also developed in Rhodesia such as psychological warfare, covert executions, and the deployment of ingenious booby traps and toxic substances. They employed: poisonous chemicals in clothing, canned food, drinks, and aspirin; and, lethal biological agents such as cholera and anthrax to contaminate water supplies and farmland.
It was also reported in 1977 that several, 25-gallon drums of chemicals were delivered and, dried in the sun, and then ground into a powder. The noxious powder was later brushed onto the denim clothing favored by the guerrillas, mixed into processed meat such as bully beef before being repacked in new cans, or injected into bottles of alcohol with a micro-needle. In addition, several prisoners were forcibly used to determine the effects of the poisons, and their corpses were disposed of secretly.
The Rhodesians also made several attempts to disseminate lethal CBW agents, in particular Vibrio cholera and Bacillus anthracis. Rhodesian Special Air Service (SAS) also dropping anthrax spores from an aircraft near Plumtree on the Botswana border in experiments to try to kill cattle in the Gutu, Chilimanzi, Masvingo, and Mberengwa areas.
The main purpose of including this CBW programme in this nuke story is to reveal that historically the US and UK have been closely associated with WMD/CBW and willingly approved such programmes. If we can all recall the Anthrax letter scare in the US then one can see the way such practices can get out of hand and be used by some sinister groups. Again I would like to put an emphasis on the fact that the US and UK government always applied pressure on the UN in regard to Saddam’s use of CBW on Iran and the Kurds when they themselves gave the Iraqi’s the chemicals and know how to carry out these attacked. How two faced can you get?
We can now look at another special operation that followed on from the above transfer of CBW to South Africa with what was known as “Project Coast.” This project was the development, testing, and utilization of a wide array of hard-to-trace toxic agents to assassinate enemies of the South African state but went far beyond its original intention. Some of the plans included drugging victims before tossing their bodies out of an airplane into the ocean, which was similar to the tactics used in Rhodesia.
The substances employed in the assassination program included potentially lethal chemicals such as aldicarb, brodifacum, cantharidin, colchamine, cyanide, digoxin, methanol, monensin, paraoxon, paraquat, phencyclidine, phosphide, silatrane, sodium azide, thallium, and vitamin D3; biological agents such as anthrax spores, botulinum toxin, brucella bacteria, salmonella bacteria, mamba venom, and cholera bacteria. A wide variety of foodstuffs, beverages, household items, and cigarettes were contaminated with these poisons.
Methods of delivery included turning rings, screwdrivers, walking sticks, and umbrellas into assassination devices by adding poison compartments and injectors and firing mechanisms for poisoned pellets. As we can all see the true world of James Bond really does exist. It is also interesting to note that the evil regime that existed at the time also intended to create a “Black only Bomb” which would specifically target the black populations of South Africa. This bomb would directly attack their genetics with the minimum result of making black Africans sterile etc.
Before moving onto the nuclear industry in South Africa we should also mention Dr. David Kelly British arms inspector and micro biologist, Dr. Kelly, has always been linked to the fact he knew too much about the illegal arms trade to the Middle East, including the real story about WMD in Iraq. Although the official story of his 2003 death tells a tale of suicide, many observers close to the case claim Dr. Kelly was anything but suicidal. They also contend the follow-up investigation was appalling, claiming the Hutton Commission set up by the British Parliament to investigate Dr. Kelly’s death covered up important facts that would have implicated high-ranking British and American officials.
It is believed that Dr. Kelly knew all about the “Black only Bomb” as well as missing nuclear weapons which we will talk about after this segment covering CBW. It would appear that he may have been assigned to look into some aspects of the above by both Maggie Thatcher and John Major and therefore his implication would have put two very senior politicians in the firing line had he divulged this knowledge to the media or in his book. It is also believed that Dick Cheney was also clearly disturbed that Dr. Kelly could spill the beans on all of the above as well as information concerning missing nuclear weapons. At the time of his assassination Tony Blair just happened to be in the United States and was awarded a Gold Medal but never received it…….maybe because it was tainted with blood!
Dr Kelly had really gone through a very rough patch with the British political elite and many people in high places were aware that he could spill the beans on dangerous and deadly secrets that could topple governments, especially the CBW programme in South Africa to which Thatcher was privy. Biological weapons research continues today and remains a subject one cannot talk about. The 2001 Anthrax attacks in the US proved that the programme was still very much alive. Obviously all of the above implicated the USA and big cover-ups were made by the FBI.
It must be clearly understand that Maggie Thatcher and certain members of the Conservative were not only aware but also supported the “Black only Bomb” and were also involved in many other under the radar operations. There existed an under the table illegal arms trade which at the time amounted to around 55 million pounds (as a starter). Money would flow from government sources to the arms dealers for weapons provided to both Iran and Iraq. One can clearly see this is not only an extremely two faced approach but also a clear case of “You reap in the harvest of your own making”.
Now we come to the establishment of the South African Nuclear Industry that managed to make 10 nuclear weapons without the United Nations ever finding out. Needless to say the US and UK Government certainly knew about them but not the United Nations. I find it amazing that David Cameron and others travelled to South Africa during the embargo period and not only violated international law but also violated international law in dealing with nuclear weapons that were not known to the UN. Perhaps we could give a clue as to who else became involved in this masquerade……one of them had the initials DW and another person involved is a Knight with the initials of KW.
So what was this shonky deal that took place whilst the United Nations was sleeping and involved the South African Government, the US Government and the UK Government and dare I say the Israeli Government? Let’s again re visit the nuclear research programme that went a bit too far….thanks to all of the above.
It is believed that South Africa started its weapons nuclear research programme as early at 1973. It wasn’t until 1977 that the Atomic Energy Board completed manufacture of South Africa's first full-scale nuclear explosive device based on a gun-type design. It was with the help of Israelis that South Africa achieved it first success when on 22 September 1979, a U.S. Vela surveillance satellite detected a distinct light event off of Africa's southern coast and this was believe to be the first test of a nuclear bomb. South Africa in actual fact designed and built a total of 10 fully operational weapons, ready for use! One can clearly see that this left only 9 weapons in the stockpile.
In August 1988, Roelof Frederik "Pik" Botha, the South African foreign minister, announced that his nation had "the capability to make one [a nuclear weapon]" should it want to do so. A month later, in September 1988, South Africa sent a letter to IAEA Director General Hans Blix expressing willingness to accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if certain conditions were met, primarily that South Africa be allowed to market its uranium subject to IAEA safeguards. Less than two years later, the de Klerk government terminated the nuclear weapons program. All nuclear devices were dismantled and destroyed……..let me just hold it there one minute and clarify what was said in this paragraph “That in less than two years all nuclear devices were dismantled and destroyed……. This was not the case!!
In 1989 David Cameron and others went down to South Africa to carry out some sinister plan that resulted in only 6 operational nuclear weapons going back to the US for de commissioning.The other three were to be purchased by the British Government as a standby mechanism against Saddam. Remember this is all under the radar of the United Nations!
So who was involved in this under the table deal, who paid for them and where did they go? Did anyone in the UK receive a significant party donation and if so whom and by what amount? Did other leaders get to know about this and was their palms brushed? The answer is simply “Yes” and those two leaders were Tony Blair and Gordon Brown……stay tuned for more clever 007 stuff.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 3/2/2010
As we discussed in Part 1 three nuclear weapons went missing from the US and now our focus must turn to the three that went missing from under the nose of the good old Brit’s. Don’t you think it is ironic that over one million Iraq’s may have died because of our gross neglect? Let’s not also forget the thousands of troops that also died for nothing!
We have to turn the clock back to 1989 when a very young, wet behind the ears, David Cameron broke the stringent embargo on South Africa and paid a quick but purposeful visit to the Deep South. He was also accompanied by another illustrious Conservative figure who had a little bit more technical know how under his belt.
So why did dear Maggie take such a risk in sending her cavalry all the way down to South Africa? Was there something big to look at? Was their an opportunity for some shonky arms dealer to make big money and in turn possible slip a few thousand in the kitty fund of the Conservative Party? You bet there was!
Ok so lets look into this cloak and dagger operation that went terrible wrong and resulted in the assassination of dear Dr. David Kelly (Oh sorry I shouldn’t have let that slip out it was suicide wasn’t it?). Did this implicate David Cameron and his side kick in not only breaking international law but also in high level corruption? Surely no politician would put his reputation at risk, all for the sake of party funds donation?..........you’ve got to be joking; they would sell their mother for much less!
What was going on in South Africa that basically became the source of going to war in Iraq and why haven’t these culprits been punished and who else knew about this British monumental stuff up? Did the British Labour Party also know about this mess that Maggie Thatcher got us into?.....you bet they did……Dear Dr. Kelly also knew in great detail!
It all comes down to a nuclear weapons programme that was kept hidden from the United Nations by both the US and UK governments….starting to get the picture? The South African Government hid an awful lot of extremely nasty stuff from the
world but good old US of A and the UK knew everything….just like partners in crime.
Let’s just turn the clock back a little further at the time when Rhodesia ceased to exist and became Zimbabwe. It was in Rhodesia that Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) were fine tuned and eventually moved lock stock and barrel to South Africa along with its team of experts.
All of this CBW transfer was under the watchful eye of the British Government who approved the transfer….needless to say the US also became tagged to this evil development.
We may find it hard to believe that way back in the 1960’s the Portuguese used Chemical Warfare by poisoning water wells, drugged prisoners and threw them out of aircraft. It is also hard to believe that other evil ways were also developed in Rhodesia such as psychological warfare, covert executions, and the deployment of ingenious booby traps and toxic substances. They employed: poisonous chemicals in clothing, canned food, drinks, and aspirin; and, lethal biological agents such as cholera and anthrax to contaminate water supplies and farmland.
It was also reported in 1977 that several, 25-gallon drums of chemicals were delivered and, dried in the sun, and then ground into a powder. The noxious powder was later brushed onto the denim clothing favored by the guerrillas, mixed into processed meat such as bully beef before being repacked in new cans, or injected into bottles of alcohol with a micro-needle. In addition, several prisoners were forcibly used to determine the effects of the poisons, and their corpses were disposed of secretly.
The Rhodesians also made several attempts to disseminate lethal CBW agents, in particular Vibrio cholera and Bacillus anthracis. Rhodesian Special Air Service (SAS) also dropping anthrax spores from an aircraft near Plumtree on the Botswana border in experiments to try to kill cattle in the Gutu, Chilimanzi, Masvingo, and Mberengwa areas.
The main purpose of including this CBW programme in this nuke story is to reveal that historically the US and UK have been closely associated with WMD/CBW and willingly approved such programmes. If we can all recall the Anthrax letter scare in the US then one can see the way such practices can get out of hand and be used by some sinister groups. Again I would like to put an emphasis on the fact that the US and UK government always applied pressure on the UN in regard to Saddam’s use of CBW on Iran and the Kurds when they themselves gave the Iraqi’s the chemicals and know how to carry out these attacked. How two faced can you get?
We can now look at another special operation that followed on from the above transfer of CBW to South Africa with what was known as “Project Coast.” This project was the development, testing, and utilization of a wide array of hard-to-trace toxic agents to assassinate enemies of the South African state but went far beyond its original intention. Some of the plans included drugging victims before tossing their bodies out of an airplane into the ocean, which was similar to the tactics used in Rhodesia.
The substances employed in the assassination program included potentially lethal chemicals such as aldicarb, brodifacum, cantharidin, colchamine, cyanide, digoxin, methanol, monensin, paraoxon, paraquat, phencyclidine, phosphide, silatrane, sodium azide, thallium, and vitamin D3; biological agents such as anthrax spores, botulinum toxin, brucella bacteria, salmonella bacteria, mamba venom, and cholera bacteria. A wide variety of foodstuffs, beverages, household items, and cigarettes were contaminated with these poisons.
Methods of delivery included turning rings, screwdrivers, walking sticks, and umbrellas into assassination devices by adding poison compartments and injectors and firing mechanisms for poisoned pellets. As we can all see the true world of James Bond really does exist. It is also interesting to note that the evil regime that existed at the time also intended to create a “Black only Bomb” which would specifically target the black populations of South Africa. This bomb would directly attack their genetics with the minimum result of making black Africans sterile etc.
Before moving onto the nuclear industry in South Africa we should also mention Dr. David Kelly British arms inspector and micro biologist, Dr. Kelly, has always been linked to the fact he knew too much about the illegal arms trade to the Middle East, including the real story about WMD in Iraq. Although the official story of his 2003 death tells a tale of suicide, many observers close to the case claim Dr. Kelly was anything but suicidal. They also contend the follow-up investigation was appalling, claiming the Hutton Commission set up by the British Parliament to investigate Dr. Kelly’s death covered up important facts that would have implicated high-ranking British and American officials.
It is believed that Dr. Kelly knew all about the “Black only Bomb” as well as missing nuclear weapons which we will talk about after this segment covering CBW. It would appear that he may have been assigned to look into some aspects of the above by both Maggie Thatcher and John Major and therefore his implication would have put two very senior politicians in the firing line had he divulged this knowledge to the media or in his book. It is also believed that Dick Cheney was also clearly disturbed that Dr. Kelly could spill the beans on all of the above as well as information concerning missing nuclear weapons. At the time of his assassination Tony Blair just happened to be in the United States and was awarded a Gold Medal but never received it…….maybe because it was tainted with blood!
Dr Kelly had really gone through a very rough patch with the British political elite and many people in high places were aware that he could spill the beans on dangerous and deadly secrets that could topple governments, especially the CBW programme in South Africa to which Thatcher was privy. Biological weapons research continues today and remains a subject one cannot talk about. The 2001 Anthrax attacks in the US proved that the programme was still very much alive. Obviously all of the above implicated the USA and big cover-ups were made by the FBI.
It must be clearly understand that Maggie Thatcher and certain members of the Conservative were not only aware but also supported the “Black only Bomb” and were also involved in many other under the radar operations. There existed an under the table illegal arms trade which at the time amounted to around 55 million pounds (as a starter). Money would flow from government sources to the arms dealers for weapons provided to both Iran and Iraq. One can clearly see this is not only an extremely two faced approach but also a clear case of “You reap in the harvest of your own making”.
Now we come to the establishment of the South African Nuclear Industry that managed to make 10 nuclear weapons without the United Nations ever finding out. Needless to say the US and UK Government certainly knew about them but not the United Nations. I find it amazing that David Cameron and others travelled to South Africa during the embargo period and not only violated international law but also violated international law in dealing with nuclear weapons that were not known to the UN. Perhaps we could give a clue as to who else became involved in this masquerade……one of them had the initials DW and another person involved is a Knight with the initials of KW.
So what was this shonky deal that took place whilst the United Nations was sleeping and involved the South African Government, the US Government and the UK Government and dare I say the Israeli Government? Let’s again re visit the nuclear research programme that went a bit too far….thanks to all of the above.
It is believed that South Africa started its weapons nuclear research programme as early at 1973. It wasn’t until 1977 that the Atomic Energy Board completed manufacture of South Africa's first full-scale nuclear explosive device based on a gun-type design. It was with the help of Israelis that South Africa achieved it first success when on 22 September 1979, a U.S. Vela surveillance satellite detected a distinct light event off of Africa's southern coast and this was believe to be the first test of a nuclear bomb. South Africa in actual fact designed and built a total of 10 fully operational weapons, ready for use! One can clearly see that this left only 9 weapons in the stockpile.
In August 1988, Roelof Frederik "Pik" Botha, the South African foreign minister, announced that his nation had "the capability to make one [a nuclear weapon]" should it want to do so. A month later, in September 1988, South Africa sent a letter to IAEA Director General Hans Blix expressing willingness to accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if certain conditions were met, primarily that South Africa be allowed to market its uranium subject to IAEA safeguards. Less than two years later, the de Klerk government terminated the nuclear weapons program. All nuclear devices were dismantled and destroyed……..let me just hold it there one minute and clarify what was said in this paragraph “That in less than two years all nuclear devices were dismantled and destroyed……. This was not the case!!
In 1989 David Cameron and others went down to South Africa to carry out some sinister plan that resulted in only 6 operational nuclear weapons going back to the US for de commissioning.The other three were to be purchased by the British Government as a standby mechanism against Saddam. Remember this is all under the radar of the United Nations!
So who was involved in this under the table deal, who paid for them and where did they go? Did anyone in the UK receive a significant party donation and if so whom and by what amount? Did other leaders get to know about this and was their palms brushed? The answer is simply “Yes” and those two leaders were Tony Blair and Gordon Brown……stay tuned for more clever 007 stuff.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 3/2/2010
Tuesday, 2 March 2010
Things are starting to hot up but today is a sad day for Hollie
First of all I would like us all to share our deepest thoughts with Hollie whose dog died today. As we all know the dog was at the centre of Hollie’s life and became a tool for her father’s devious ways. It was because of the dog that Hollie’s mum Anne first got to know about her daughters suffering…..if we can recall…..it was her Dad who told Hollie what to do and if she didn’t cooperate he would kill her pet dog.
Hollie and Mum are extremely sad today because of the passing of her dear old dog which has deeply upset Hollie. Hollie has already been on Manchester radio and tonight she is going on two US Radio channels. They wanted to cancel their radio interviews but I asked Robert Green that they should continue on with the fight as Hollie’s dog would have wished this. Hollie has now decided to do the interviews and so we must offer our support in her moment of sadness.
On the battlefront things are certainly hotting up with the shutting down of Hollies Face book called – “We wont allow the state to cover up the Hollie Greig pedophile scandal” However all is not lost as we still have a couple of back up options on Face book which are - Hollie Greig/Robert Green and Justice for Hollie. I can only assume that someone has attacked other high profile people which rubs against the grain at this moment in time. It is counter productive to hit out at other third parties unless the evidence is beyond a shadow of doubt…..that is why my criticism is only on those associated with the case in Scotland.
If one focuses on these issue first then we are in with a chance of getting an investigation carried out and also possible a murder inquiry….therefore it is better to tread softly in order to achieve a result. Once the case is underway things will role out in a natural way.
I would strongly suggest that without delay a rally takes place in London with an assembly point outside somewhere very Scottish….then march to Trafalgar Square for a quick rally and round of speeches….follow by a march down to Number 10..this could also involve a petition that could be handed over upon arrival. I am sure that Hollie and Mum could head up the parade with Robert Green and Myself as key supporter. It could also be arranged for Scottish celebrities to participate and any Scottish political figures. We could also add some celebrities from the English end to add strength to the march and again any politicians from Westminister who would like to come onboard. I am sure that Claire Short and Baroness Tonge may also participate as they have ethical and moral values.
I feel the Arab community in the UK would also participate in this event with particular representation from the Palestinian sector who fully understands what it means to be treated in such a way as Hollie and her Mum. This same rally and march could also be repeated in Edinburgh should Number 10 not be in a position to address this issue that falls within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom.
The BBC failed to cover Hollies story some time ago as it was believed the team doing the show were threatened with their jobs. The recent arrest of Robert Green in Scotland also did not receive any coverage despite its connection with Hollie and this terrible story. One must also remember the connection with the murder of her Uncle Robert and the web of corruption and deceit at all levels of government in Scotland…..this story would normally break into a major scoop with front page headlines but as we suspect the British media has been gagged. I have inserted an explanation from the BBC as to why they did not run the story of Robert’s arrest and subsequent house raid etc
The wording of the document for those that cannot read it is as follows:
BBC Response Why they Won’t Publish Hollies Case
Thanks for your e-mail
I understand you feel that we’ve failed to cover a story relating to the arrest of Robert Green and you’re of the opinion that we’re avoiding the issue…….See more.
The choice of news stories to report in our programmes and the order in which to place them is frequently very difficult. Editorial staff always has a wide range of reports to be fitted into the time available and their choices have to be selective.
We know that a report that’s of great interest to one part of our audience may be of little interest to another but no matter how carefully such decisions are made it’s inevitable that some people will disagree with them.
However I note the strength of your feelings in relation to this matter and have registered your complaint on our audience log. The audience log is an internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers and Commissioning Executives within the BBC and also their Senior Management.
It ensures that your point, and all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.
Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.
Regards
Gerald McCusker
BBC Complaints
In addition to sending all Hollie’s article to the Prime Minister at Number 10 I have also now copied them to David Cameron. Leader of the Conservative Party and Key Ministers as well as Nick Clegg the leader of the Lib Dems. The email addresses are as follows: david.cameron@conservatives.com, clarkek@parliament.uk, haguew@parliament.uk, griggj@parliament.uk, libdemleader@parliament.uk, danny@highlandlibdems.org.uk.......
The email is as follows:
To: david.cameron@conservatives.com, clarkek@parliament.uk, haguew@parliament.uk, griggj@parliament.uk, libdemleader@parliament.uk, danny@highlandlibdems.org.uk
Gentlemen,
I have copied the attached articles to Number 10 for comment but now also to yourselves in the hope that your conscience can do something about this terrible ordeal by Hollie, mum and other children that have all been listed by Hollie. The offenders have also been listed which include figures in high positions.
These are the links for the articles
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4403-the-deeply-upsetting-story-of-hollie-greig
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4407-why-has-our-so-called-just-legal-system-turned-its-back-on-hollie-greig
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4444-compassion-for-lockerbie-bomber-but-not-for-hollie-greig
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4462-is-the-hollie-greig-story-getting-through-to-them-at-last
I await your response with interest.......this email will also be published.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 2/2/2010
I have also emailed Esther Rantzen.
Up to the current time no responses whatsoever as one would expect. I expect that the Palestine Telegraph will continue to support Hollie and her Mum as well as Talk Radio Europe and other US Radio Channels.
Keep up the fight and believe that this story will break someone and come out into the open!!
Bless you all from the people of Palestine.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 2/2/2010
Hollie and Mum are extremely sad today because of the passing of her dear old dog which has deeply upset Hollie. Hollie has already been on Manchester radio and tonight she is going on two US Radio channels. They wanted to cancel their radio interviews but I asked Robert Green that they should continue on with the fight as Hollie’s dog would have wished this. Hollie has now decided to do the interviews and so we must offer our support in her moment of sadness.
On the battlefront things are certainly hotting up with the shutting down of Hollies Face book called – “We wont allow the state to cover up the Hollie Greig pedophile scandal” However all is not lost as we still have a couple of back up options on Face book which are - Hollie Greig/Robert Green and Justice for Hollie. I can only assume that someone has attacked other high profile people which rubs against the grain at this moment in time. It is counter productive to hit out at other third parties unless the evidence is beyond a shadow of doubt…..that is why my criticism is only on those associated with the case in Scotland.
If one focuses on these issue first then we are in with a chance of getting an investigation carried out and also possible a murder inquiry….therefore it is better to tread softly in order to achieve a result. Once the case is underway things will role out in a natural way.
I would strongly suggest that without delay a rally takes place in London with an assembly point outside somewhere very Scottish….then march to Trafalgar Square for a quick rally and round of speeches….follow by a march down to Number 10..this could also involve a petition that could be handed over upon arrival. I am sure that Hollie and Mum could head up the parade with Robert Green and Myself as key supporter. It could also be arranged for Scottish celebrities to participate and any Scottish political figures. We could also add some celebrities from the English end to add strength to the march and again any politicians from Westminister who would like to come onboard. I am sure that Claire Short and Baroness Tonge may also participate as they have ethical and moral values.
I feel the Arab community in the UK would also participate in this event with particular representation from the Palestinian sector who fully understands what it means to be treated in such a way as Hollie and her Mum. This same rally and march could also be repeated in Edinburgh should Number 10 not be in a position to address this issue that falls within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom.
The BBC failed to cover Hollies story some time ago as it was believed the team doing the show were threatened with their jobs. The recent arrest of Robert Green in Scotland also did not receive any coverage despite its connection with Hollie and this terrible story. One must also remember the connection with the murder of her Uncle Robert and the web of corruption and deceit at all levels of government in Scotland…..this story would normally break into a major scoop with front page headlines but as we suspect the British media has been gagged. I have inserted an explanation from the BBC as to why they did not run the story of Robert’s arrest and subsequent house raid etc
The wording of the document for those that cannot read it is as follows:
BBC Response Why they Won’t Publish Hollies Case
Thanks for your e-mail
I understand you feel that we’ve failed to cover a story relating to the arrest of Robert Green and you’re of the opinion that we’re avoiding the issue…….See more.
The choice of news stories to report in our programmes and the order in which to place them is frequently very difficult. Editorial staff always has a wide range of reports to be fitted into the time available and their choices have to be selective.
We know that a report that’s of great interest to one part of our audience may be of little interest to another but no matter how carefully such decisions are made it’s inevitable that some people will disagree with them.
However I note the strength of your feelings in relation to this matter and have registered your complaint on our audience log. The audience log is an internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers and Commissioning Executives within the BBC and also their Senior Management.
It ensures that your point, and all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.
Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.
Regards
Gerald McCusker
BBC Complaints
In addition to sending all Hollie’s article to the Prime Minister at Number 10 I have also now copied them to David Cameron. Leader of the Conservative Party and Key Ministers as well as Nick Clegg the leader of the Lib Dems. The email addresses are as follows: david.cameron@conservatives.com, clarkek@parliament.uk, haguew@parliament.uk, griggj@parliament.uk, libdemleader@parliament.uk, danny@highlandlibdems.org.uk.......
The email is as follows:
To: david.cameron@conservatives.com, clarkek@parliament.uk, haguew@parliament.uk, griggj@parliament.uk, libdemleader@parliament.uk, danny@highlandlibdems.org.uk
Gentlemen,
I have copied the attached articles to Number 10 for comment but now also to yourselves in the hope that your conscience can do something about this terrible ordeal by Hollie, mum and other children that have all been listed by Hollie. The offenders have also been listed which include figures in high positions.
These are the links for the articles
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4403-the-deeply-upsetting-story-of-hollie-greig
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4407-why-has-our-so-called-just-legal-system-turned-its-back-on-hollie-greig
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4444-compassion-for-lockerbie-bomber-but-not-for-hollie-greig
http://www.paltelegraph.com/columnists/peter-eyre/4462-is-the-hollie-greig-story-getting-through-to-them-at-last
I await your response with interest.......this email will also be published.
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 2/2/2010
I have also emailed Esther Rantzen.
Up to the current time no responses whatsoever as one would expect. I expect that the Palestine Telegraph will continue to support Hollie and her Mum as well as Talk Radio Europe and other US Radio Channels.
Keep up the fight and believe that this story will break someone and come out into the open!!
Bless you all from the people of Palestine.
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 2/2/2010
Has the United Nations failed Gaza and Palestine?
So many times in recent history we have seen the UN intervene in many areas of conflict. So many times we have seen the blue helmets of UN peacekeeping troops enter such areas to restore stability and yet for some reason this simple task does not encompass Gaza and West Bank.
Where are UN peacekeepers at the moment and why is Palestine not a number one priority on their list? Could this be manipulation from the US and Israeli sector and the influence of the Pro Israeli Lobby Groups that hold significant control of politics in congress? Are those in the US Congress fearful of loosing their campaign funds or financial support?
It is clear that the United Nations is no longer able to fulfill its obligation to the international community and therefore is guilty of gross neglect. The UN currently has blue helmets operating in the region, so let’s try to understand why Palestine does not receive any UN attention? The weakness of the UN in pushing forward the Goldstone report also shows that the UN is clearly not in control of itself.
Let’s first look at the purpose and role of UN Peacekeepers (as taken off their webpage):
United Nations peacekeeping is a unique and dynamic instrument developed by the Organization as a way to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace. Today’s peacekeepers undertake a wide variety of complex tasks, from helping to build sustainable institutions of governance, to human rights monitoring, to security sector reform, to the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of former combatants. So what has gone so terribly wrong with this organization in relation to Palestine (especially Gaza) and has the United Nations lost it direction?
With the UN currently operating in the Middle East it leads me to believe that really the solution to the on going Israeli – Palestinian issue can be resolved in exactly the same way. So what are they doing in the region? Here’s an extraction from their report: Supervising ceasefire and disengagement agreement:
Israel – Syria: From early March 1974, the situation in the Israel-Syria sector became increasingly unstable, and firing intensified. The United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) was established on 31 May 1974 by Security Council resolution 350 (1974), following the agreed disengagement of the Israeli and Syrian forces in the Golan Heights. Since then, UNDOF has remained in the area to maintain the ceasefire between the Israeli and Syrian forces and to supervise the implementation of the disengagement agreement.
Monitoring cessation of hostilities and helping ensure humanitarian access to civilian population:
Israel – Lebanon: Originally, UNIFIL was created by the Security Council in March 1978 to confirm Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, restore international peace and security and assist the Lebanese Government in restoring its effective authority in the area. The mandate had to be adjusted twice, due to the developments in 1982 and 2000.Following the July/August 2006 crisis, the Council enhanced the Force and decided that in addition to the original mandate, it would, among other things, monitor the cessation of hostilities; accompany and support the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy throughout the south of Lebanon; and extend its assistance to help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons.
Helping to bring stability in the Middle East:
Set up in May 1948, UNTSO was the first ever peacekeeping operation established by the United Nations. Since then, UNTSO military observers have remained in the Middle East to monitor ceasefires, supervise armistice agreements, prevent isolated incidents from escalating and assist other UN peacekeeping operations in the region to fulfill their respective mandates.
UNTSO personnel have also been available at short notice to form the nucleus of some other peacekeeping operations worldwide. The availability of UNTSO's military observers for almost immediate deployment after the Security Council had acted to create a new mission has been an enormous contributory factor to the early deployment and the success of those operations.
Israel – Palestine (Gaza) UN Peacekeeping activity ZERO
What I find ironic about this entire situation is the fact that all of the above is all focused on the aggression by Israel and its inability to seek genuine peace with its Arab neighbours. If one adds up the cost of this aggression and the added support in military aid to Israel we are talking about billions of dollars. Wouldn’t you think a better option would be for UN Peacekeeping forces to be based on all sides of the Israel border? This could then point the way to the demilitarisation of Israel to a level on balance with their neighbours.
Why is so much attention and money being made available to Israel and yet no attention is made towards Palestine? How could this unrest between the Israeli’s and the Palestinians be resolves and is it as complicated as they are making out?
I have to say that the solution is as simple as any other conflict area and the UN is holding the key! How could this conflict be resolved and is it so clear cut and simple? You may be shocked to learn that it is not only simple but it can be implemented immediately and without delay. Before such a plan came into being one clear message has to be drawn in the sand and that is that Palestine does not have to be submissive towards Israel anymore and Israel’s current power, occupation and blockade over Palestine must be taken away!!
The road map to peace does not exist and has never existed and it is clear that Israel will continue to nibble away at Palestinian Territory in the West Bank with the long term intention of diminishing the Arab population to a small enclave of insignificant size. So how could a UN plan work and what is required?
It is clear now that Palestine must direct all of its energy directly with the United Nations and likewise Israel must also communicate via the United Nations. Direct dialogue does not work as the hatred and lack of trust has gone too far. Other regional players must also be invited to participate and resolve the many issues between Israel and Palestine. I would also have to say that the West must now really take a back seat and allow the countries in the region to put forward suggestions.
First the UN should make a decision to provide troops in a peacekeeping role. These troops must not be NATO combat troops but consist of blue helmet peacekeepers. The basis for this force would be to secure both sides of all borders between Israel – Lebanon, Israel – Syria, Israel – Gaza, Israel – West Bank, West Bank – Jordan and Gaza – Egypt.
Once the peacekeepers have taken up position to police and guard the borders the entire blockade can be lifted by land, sea and air. It would then be up to Israel to discuss with the UN any problems they are facing and likewise the Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank would discuss their problems with the UN directly.
The next step would be to construct and elevated highway between the North East corner of Gaza and the South West corner of West Bank in order for the two enclaves to come together and to share a common goal of becoming one and to allow trade and growth to take place. The Israeli Territory would not be interfered with as Israeli traffic would pass under the highway without any direct contact with the Palestinians.
Once this has taken place the UN should nurture a get together for all political parties in Palestine to come together in preparation for the development of both enclaves in both the political sense and commercially. Once a deal has been struck the next stage would be to develop Palestine. The plan could be a phased development as follows:
1. Firstly the borders onshore and offshore have to be redefined via the United Nations and UNCLOS and the Oslo Accord and all other existing plans be scrapped and renegotiated. Application for full Statehood would then take place and normal sovereignty would prevail
2. All existing offshore production, exploration and drilling by the current Joint Venture US – Israel company be stopped until clarification has been received from UNCLOS on legal maritime boundaries. The same applies to any such work onshore that involves natural resources in disputed areas i.e. West Bank.
3. Existing areas of natural resources must then be revealed as to their extent and location to determine legal ownership. This obviously must be reviewed once the borders have been clarified. If any such field extends into Gazan Waters then the field should be deemed as jointly owned and if proven to be so then Israel would have to compensate Palestine accordingly for the oil/gas that it has already taken.
4. If fields are jointly owned then negotiations must take place as to how to commercialise the field and share a common resource.
5. The original natural resources licenses and contract between Palestine – Israel - British Gas becomes null and void due to lack of activity and breach of original terms.
6. A new plan would have to be drawn up for all offshore activity as the offshore area would now be significantly larger with Palestine having full legal waters and its own EEZ. This plan would allocate exploration permit areas and then offer them for tender.
7. The existing known fields of Gaza Marine 1 and 2 would be up for tender in the normal way but would offer Palestine a more realistic share ratio than the one originally offered.
8. Israel would not lay any claim to Palestinians natural resources and therefore it would be left to the joint venture company that brings the field into production to sell its product at the best price and to the economic well being of Palestine.
9. The natural gas and any oil from the entire Palestinian EEZ should be piped directly into the Gaza Strip to encourage the development of a Domestic Gas Plant (Domgas) and a Liquefied Natural Gas Plant (LNG) facilities.
10. Once the above two plants are in situ then a pipeline can be run to a new Gas Turbine Power Stations in both Gaza and West Bank to secure its independence from Israel. The products will be piped along the elevated highway between Gaza and West Bank. Both enclaves can then run Domgas to all homes and industries and public transport and commercial vehicles could also run on Natural Gas.
11. A major LNG export terminal and seaport could then be built on the Gaza coast to export LNG to world markets.
12. A possible pipeline from the Domgas facility in Gaza could cross the border into Israel and link in with their existing pipeline network if the Israeli Government would accept Palestinian Gas.
13. The international community would then help Palestine flourish into a progressive international market by developing the internal infrastructure of both Gaza and West Bank. This would entail re development of the damaged airport in Gaza and the airport in West Bank along with the road infrastructure.
14. Finally the development of Palestine’s own Airline and Shipping Line should take place connecting Palestine with the world and possibly a commercial ferry service between Gaza – Cairo, Gaza – Cyprus, Gaza – Lebanon and Gaza - Syria etc.
15. Any existing Israeli subsea pipelines that enter the legal limits of Gaza would be liable to a transit fee and back dated accordingly.
During this entire phased development the United Nations Peacekeepers would remain in place to act as International Police and Border Guard. There should be no involvement from the US, UK and EU except in having the ability to tender for contract as and when they are available. The success of such a mammoth task must be left in the hands of the UN and the neighborouring countries. This is a Middle East issue and should not be overshadowed by “Western Interference or its associated foreign policies”
I have myself have much experience in most of the above areas and would be more than happy to mediate over the success and implementation of such a master plan. As I have said so many times before….the wealth in Gaza’s offshore reserves is huge with many more hidden treasures (not forgetting the importance of re establishing Gaza’s Fishing Industry that is so vital to its well being). We must cast aside this hatred and allow Palestine to develop in peace….this can only be achieved by giving its own enclave back to its people i.e. West Bank and for all Israeli to leave its territory as it did in Gaza.
One must give the people of Gaza and West Bank a vision…..Maybe “Vision 2020” I truly believe that Palestine could become the Dubai of the Eastern Mediterranean. With all its wealth offshore I would ask you all is this possible? From my own experience I can say categorically “YES”
The people of the Middle East have been very much part of my life and I can assure you that they are truly very nice people. We in the west have tarnished them by repeating that they are the axis of evil when rather the opposite exists. It is the iron fist foreign policies and greed of the west that has now reached boiling point. They want control of the vast wealth that lies beneath Arab soils, at whatever the cost and we must never allow this to happen. They want a war with Iran as this creates wealth for them in arms sales whilst at the same time puts the price of a barrel of oil up to levels that feed directly into their pockets…it would also allow them to take control of this vital resourceful region. The axis of evil lies within our own shores.
We in the west should pull out of all conflicts in their region and close all military bases….. then we will see the term terrorism disappear. We have to learn to trade with them and not fight them. We have all lost our direction and the ability to love thy neighbour. I have shared many tears with these people who have lost so much, been tortured or who are now living overseas and can never return. It is only when you share their pain do you appreciate what has caused it!! So the big question is “Could Palestine receive Peacekeepers”? Not if the US has its way….Clinton on one hand tells Israel to lift the blockade but if this came before the Security Council the US would Veto it. The UN just like its predecessor, the League of Nations, is dead in the water!!
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 2/2/ 2010
Where are UN peacekeepers at the moment and why is Palestine not a number one priority on their list? Could this be manipulation from the US and Israeli sector and the influence of the Pro Israeli Lobby Groups that hold significant control of politics in congress? Are those in the US Congress fearful of loosing their campaign funds or financial support?
It is clear that the United Nations is no longer able to fulfill its obligation to the international community and therefore is guilty of gross neglect. The UN currently has blue helmets operating in the region, so let’s try to understand why Palestine does not receive any UN attention? The weakness of the UN in pushing forward the Goldstone report also shows that the UN is clearly not in control of itself.
Let’s first look at the purpose and role of UN Peacekeepers (as taken off their webpage):
United Nations peacekeeping is a unique and dynamic instrument developed by the Organization as a way to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace. Today’s peacekeepers undertake a wide variety of complex tasks, from helping to build sustainable institutions of governance, to human rights monitoring, to security sector reform, to the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of former combatants. So what has gone so terribly wrong with this organization in relation to Palestine (especially Gaza) and has the United Nations lost it direction?
With the UN currently operating in the Middle East it leads me to believe that really the solution to the on going Israeli – Palestinian issue can be resolved in exactly the same way. So what are they doing in the region? Here’s an extraction from their report: Supervising ceasefire and disengagement agreement:
Israel – Syria: From early March 1974, the situation in the Israel-Syria sector became increasingly unstable, and firing intensified. The United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) was established on 31 May 1974 by Security Council resolution 350 (1974), following the agreed disengagement of the Israeli and Syrian forces in the Golan Heights. Since then, UNDOF has remained in the area to maintain the ceasefire between the Israeli and Syrian forces and to supervise the implementation of the disengagement agreement.
Monitoring cessation of hostilities and helping ensure humanitarian access to civilian population:
Israel – Lebanon: Originally, UNIFIL was created by the Security Council in March 1978 to confirm Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, restore international peace and security and assist the Lebanese Government in restoring its effective authority in the area. The mandate had to be adjusted twice, due to the developments in 1982 and 2000.Following the July/August 2006 crisis, the Council enhanced the Force and decided that in addition to the original mandate, it would, among other things, monitor the cessation of hostilities; accompany and support the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy throughout the south of Lebanon; and extend its assistance to help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons.
Helping to bring stability in the Middle East:
Set up in May 1948, UNTSO was the first ever peacekeeping operation established by the United Nations. Since then, UNTSO military observers have remained in the Middle East to monitor ceasefires, supervise armistice agreements, prevent isolated incidents from escalating and assist other UN peacekeeping operations in the region to fulfill their respective mandates.
UNTSO personnel have also been available at short notice to form the nucleus of some other peacekeeping operations worldwide. The availability of UNTSO's military observers for almost immediate deployment after the Security Council had acted to create a new mission has been an enormous contributory factor to the early deployment and the success of those operations.
Israel – Palestine (Gaza) UN Peacekeeping activity ZERO
What I find ironic about this entire situation is the fact that all of the above is all focused on the aggression by Israel and its inability to seek genuine peace with its Arab neighbours. If one adds up the cost of this aggression and the added support in military aid to Israel we are talking about billions of dollars. Wouldn’t you think a better option would be for UN Peacekeeping forces to be based on all sides of the Israel border? This could then point the way to the demilitarisation of Israel to a level on balance with their neighbours.
Why is so much attention and money being made available to Israel and yet no attention is made towards Palestine? How could this unrest between the Israeli’s and the Palestinians be resolves and is it as complicated as they are making out?
I have to say that the solution is as simple as any other conflict area and the UN is holding the key! How could this conflict be resolved and is it so clear cut and simple? You may be shocked to learn that it is not only simple but it can be implemented immediately and without delay. Before such a plan came into being one clear message has to be drawn in the sand and that is that Palestine does not have to be submissive towards Israel anymore and Israel’s current power, occupation and blockade over Palestine must be taken away!!
The road map to peace does not exist and has never existed and it is clear that Israel will continue to nibble away at Palestinian Territory in the West Bank with the long term intention of diminishing the Arab population to a small enclave of insignificant size. So how could a UN plan work and what is required?
It is clear now that Palestine must direct all of its energy directly with the United Nations and likewise Israel must also communicate via the United Nations. Direct dialogue does not work as the hatred and lack of trust has gone too far. Other regional players must also be invited to participate and resolve the many issues between Israel and Palestine. I would also have to say that the West must now really take a back seat and allow the countries in the region to put forward suggestions.
First the UN should make a decision to provide troops in a peacekeeping role. These troops must not be NATO combat troops but consist of blue helmet peacekeepers. The basis for this force would be to secure both sides of all borders between Israel – Lebanon, Israel – Syria, Israel – Gaza, Israel – West Bank, West Bank – Jordan and Gaza – Egypt.
Once the peacekeepers have taken up position to police and guard the borders the entire blockade can be lifted by land, sea and air. It would then be up to Israel to discuss with the UN any problems they are facing and likewise the Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank would discuss their problems with the UN directly.
The next step would be to construct and elevated highway between the North East corner of Gaza and the South West corner of West Bank in order for the two enclaves to come together and to share a common goal of becoming one and to allow trade and growth to take place. The Israeli Territory would not be interfered with as Israeli traffic would pass under the highway without any direct contact with the Palestinians.
Once this has taken place the UN should nurture a get together for all political parties in Palestine to come together in preparation for the development of both enclaves in both the political sense and commercially. Once a deal has been struck the next stage would be to develop Palestine. The plan could be a phased development as follows:
1. Firstly the borders onshore and offshore have to be redefined via the United Nations and UNCLOS and the Oslo Accord and all other existing plans be scrapped and renegotiated. Application for full Statehood would then take place and normal sovereignty would prevail
2. All existing offshore production, exploration and drilling by the current Joint Venture US – Israel company be stopped until clarification has been received from UNCLOS on legal maritime boundaries. The same applies to any such work onshore that involves natural resources in disputed areas i.e. West Bank.
3. Existing areas of natural resources must then be revealed as to their extent and location to determine legal ownership. This obviously must be reviewed once the borders have been clarified. If any such field extends into Gazan Waters then the field should be deemed as jointly owned and if proven to be so then Israel would have to compensate Palestine accordingly for the oil/gas that it has already taken.
4. If fields are jointly owned then negotiations must take place as to how to commercialise the field and share a common resource.
5. The original natural resources licenses and contract between Palestine – Israel - British Gas becomes null and void due to lack of activity and breach of original terms.
6. A new plan would have to be drawn up for all offshore activity as the offshore area would now be significantly larger with Palestine having full legal waters and its own EEZ. This plan would allocate exploration permit areas and then offer them for tender.
7. The existing known fields of Gaza Marine 1 and 2 would be up for tender in the normal way but would offer Palestine a more realistic share ratio than the one originally offered.
8. Israel would not lay any claim to Palestinians natural resources and therefore it would be left to the joint venture company that brings the field into production to sell its product at the best price and to the economic well being of Palestine.
9. The natural gas and any oil from the entire Palestinian EEZ should be piped directly into the Gaza Strip to encourage the development of a Domestic Gas Plant (Domgas) and a Liquefied Natural Gas Plant (LNG) facilities.
10. Once the above two plants are in situ then a pipeline can be run to a new Gas Turbine Power Stations in both Gaza and West Bank to secure its independence from Israel. The products will be piped along the elevated highway between Gaza and West Bank. Both enclaves can then run Domgas to all homes and industries and public transport and commercial vehicles could also run on Natural Gas.
11. A major LNG export terminal and seaport could then be built on the Gaza coast to export LNG to world markets.
12. A possible pipeline from the Domgas facility in Gaza could cross the border into Israel and link in with their existing pipeline network if the Israeli Government would accept Palestinian Gas.
13. The international community would then help Palestine flourish into a progressive international market by developing the internal infrastructure of both Gaza and West Bank. This would entail re development of the damaged airport in Gaza and the airport in West Bank along with the road infrastructure.
14. Finally the development of Palestine’s own Airline and Shipping Line should take place connecting Palestine with the world and possibly a commercial ferry service between Gaza – Cairo, Gaza – Cyprus, Gaza – Lebanon and Gaza - Syria etc.
15. Any existing Israeli subsea pipelines that enter the legal limits of Gaza would be liable to a transit fee and back dated accordingly.
During this entire phased development the United Nations Peacekeepers would remain in place to act as International Police and Border Guard. There should be no involvement from the US, UK and EU except in having the ability to tender for contract as and when they are available. The success of such a mammoth task must be left in the hands of the UN and the neighborouring countries. This is a Middle East issue and should not be overshadowed by “Western Interference or its associated foreign policies”
I have myself have much experience in most of the above areas and would be more than happy to mediate over the success and implementation of such a master plan. As I have said so many times before….the wealth in Gaza’s offshore reserves is huge with many more hidden treasures (not forgetting the importance of re establishing Gaza’s Fishing Industry that is so vital to its well being). We must cast aside this hatred and allow Palestine to develop in peace….this can only be achieved by giving its own enclave back to its people i.e. West Bank and for all Israeli to leave its territory as it did in Gaza.
One must give the people of Gaza and West Bank a vision…..Maybe “Vision 2020” I truly believe that Palestine could become the Dubai of the Eastern Mediterranean. With all its wealth offshore I would ask you all is this possible? From my own experience I can say categorically “YES”
The people of the Middle East have been very much part of my life and I can assure you that they are truly very nice people. We in the west have tarnished them by repeating that they are the axis of evil when rather the opposite exists. It is the iron fist foreign policies and greed of the west that has now reached boiling point. They want control of the vast wealth that lies beneath Arab soils, at whatever the cost and we must never allow this to happen. They want a war with Iran as this creates wealth for them in arms sales whilst at the same time puts the price of a barrel of oil up to levels that feed directly into their pockets…it would also allow them to take control of this vital resourceful region. The axis of evil lies within our own shores.
We in the west should pull out of all conflicts in their region and close all military bases….. then we will see the term terrorism disappear. We have to learn to trade with them and not fight them. We have all lost our direction and the ability to love thy neighbour. I have shared many tears with these people who have lost so much, been tortured or who are now living overseas and can never return. It is only when you share their pain do you appreciate what has caused it!! So the big question is “Could Palestine receive Peacekeepers”? Not if the US has its way….Clinton on one hand tells Israel to lift the blockade but if this came before the Security Council the US would Veto it. The UN just like its predecessor, the League of Nations, is dead in the water!!
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 2/2/ 2010
Monday, 1 March 2010
The US and UK lost three nuclear weapons each!
Part 1 – What went missing on President George H.W. Bush’s Watch?
UK, March 1, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -When one reads about the pressure that the US and UK Governments put on such countries as Iran and North Korea I find it hard to believe that they themselves are so negligent in taking care of their own weapons. I also find it so hard to believe that they have such high moral standards when trying to stop Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) but are prepared to use such evil weapons themselves.
Readers may find it incredible to know that as a result of their gross neglect three US nuclear missiles went missing without trace and have now ended up in the hands of someone else which now adds concern as to how such an event could ever happen.
The story doesn't stop there because three nuclear weapons that should have gone to the US for decommissioning were purchased in a very shady way by the British Government and they also went missing without trace and have also ended up in the hands of someone else.
You might ask how come we never knew about these two incidents and why was it kept so secret? I can also tell you that much more went on and the United Nations were never informed. So who was involved in this pathetic fiasco and why was it kept so secret? Could it be that shonky deals went on under the table and some political parties or individuals had their palms brushed with gold?
I am sure that by now your eyes are glued to this article just waiting to hear how such an event could every happen, who was implicated and who benefited from this sordid deal. One thing I can say is that you can be rest assured that no one really knows where they are now or who could use them and because of this any action taken by the west without due consideration could prove to be a catastrophic mistake.
Let's go back in time during the period when SRAM Nuclear Missiles were fully developed and ready to be used. This missile in actual fact became fairly unstable under certain conditions and eventually were pulled out of service (or so we thought). So let's take a look at this terrible weapon and fully understand it background and how many of these could be carried aboard a B52 Bomber.
The SRAM (short range attack missile, AGM 69A). The air-surface missile at the time of going missing contained a Plutonium Warhead W69M (200KT thermo-nuclear). The AGM69A missile was first manufactured in 1971 - 1976 and around 1,500 were produced. There were retired over a period of time between 1991 - 1994 although there were initially removed from active service in 1990 due to fire safety concerns. This concern however did not stop the continued operational usage.
Unknown to the United Nations and many other countries the US were playing a cat and mouse game with Iraq during Gulf War 1 and it was on President George H.W. Bush's watch that things went terribly wrong during one of his major bluffs!
He had authorized a B52 Bomber to depart its Saudi Arabian Air Base loaded with SRAM Nuclear Missiles and position overhead Baghdad. We were led to believe that this aircraft only had three missiles onboard; despite the fact it could carry twenty missiles. The idea Bush had in mind was to threaten Saddam with these nuclear weapons unless he toed the line.
The B52 with a registration number of 59-2593 suddenly encountered a major electrical problem which could have been catastrophic. The aircraft commander was instructed to head south as he continued to attempt to sort out the problem.
The aircraft eventually was instructed to head for Diego Garcia in the north of the Indian Ocean. Well into this flight things started to become more critical and the crew were very much aware of their cargo of potentially unstable weapons.
The decision was made to jettison the weapons off the coast of Somalia in relative shallow water (one would assume for possible later recovery), and then proceeded on to land at Diego Garcia. The onboard electrical system had obviously become extremely critical resulting in the aircraft loosing power to its eight engines as it attempted to get back to Diego Garcia. The aircraft started to loose height and prior to arriving at the field some crew members ejected. The aircraft by this time had dropped to below its safe ejection height and the remainder of the crew ejected but failed to deploy their chutes and consequently died. The aircraft crashed into the sea 15 nautical miles north of the field on the 3rd of February 1991.
Dick Cheney was US Secretary of Defense and did not take any immediate action to recover these weapons from off the coast of Somalia at the time and consequently they were recovered by another shonky organization in May 19991 who were supposed to be a deep sea diving/ treasure salvage team who were working in the offshore Somalia area. This diving company was operating out of the Seychelles and apparently was a cover up for a South African arms smuggling operation into Somalia. The apartheid-era South African military were sending packages of conventional arms destined for groups in Somalia, and dropping them in shallow water. The divers couldn't find these packages and had to broaden their search and accidently then came across the SRAMs. They allegedly relayed their serial numbers via the UK to a retired senior officer in the USAF to find out what they were. The news from the senior officer was that these were nuclear munitions from the B-52. I should point out at this stage that the South African arms dealer was also involved in the missing UK nuclear weapons which we shall address in Part 2 of this series.
The group communicated with South Africa's defense minister, Magnus Malan who was notoriously known for his under the table arms dealings. He met the group in South Africa but told them that the deal was off as he had just been fired by De Klerk. The trail of these weapons then faded into obscurity and no one really knows there final destination. There was talk of North Korea, Iran, Syria and Iraq but we may never know. What is fact is that at one stage some nuclear weapons did end up in Iraq(US or British)but were then relocated. I feel that in actual fact one did make it to North Korea and was detonated in one of their first tests. The second test in North Korea was totally different and could have been one of the UK's missing weapons. Should this be the case then we still have two US missiles missing and possibly two UK bombs but that's another story.
There is one thing for sure that almost certainly happened and that is that the South African arms dealer ended up with much gold in his vault and other persons in the US and UK would have also had their palms brushed. Certainly in the UK senior and junior political figures became involved in both the Conservation and Labour Parties and much money to this day has not been accounted for. The greatest concern out of all of this gross neglect by the US and UK governments is one simple question.......who has got these weapons now? That is why the US, UK and dear old Israel had better watch their step when making bold threats to other countries as they may well get a very nice surprise!!......oh and please be careful when you place your vote this year as two of the two current leaders have an awful lot of secrets they don't want you to know......especially in their very secretive donations file! keep watching this space for more riveting news!
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 28/2/2010
UK, March 1, 2010 (Pal Telegraph) -When one reads about the pressure that the US and UK Governments put on such countries as Iran and North Korea I find it hard to believe that they themselves are so negligent in taking care of their own weapons. I also find it so hard to believe that they have such high moral standards when trying to stop Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) but are prepared to use such evil weapons themselves.
Readers may find it incredible to know that as a result of their gross neglect three US nuclear missiles went missing without trace and have now ended up in the hands of someone else which now adds concern as to how such an event could ever happen.
The story doesn't stop there because three nuclear weapons that should have gone to the US for decommissioning were purchased in a very shady way by the British Government and they also went missing without trace and have also ended up in the hands of someone else.
You might ask how come we never knew about these two incidents and why was it kept so secret? I can also tell you that much more went on and the United Nations were never informed. So who was involved in this pathetic fiasco and why was it kept so secret? Could it be that shonky deals went on under the table and some political parties or individuals had their palms brushed with gold?
I am sure that by now your eyes are glued to this article just waiting to hear how such an event could every happen, who was implicated and who benefited from this sordid deal. One thing I can say is that you can be rest assured that no one really knows where they are now or who could use them and because of this any action taken by the west without due consideration could prove to be a catastrophic mistake.
Let's go back in time during the period when SRAM Nuclear Missiles were fully developed and ready to be used. This missile in actual fact became fairly unstable under certain conditions and eventually were pulled out of service (or so we thought). So let's take a look at this terrible weapon and fully understand it background and how many of these could be carried aboard a B52 Bomber.
The SRAM (short range attack missile, AGM 69A). The air-surface missile at the time of going missing contained a Plutonium Warhead W69M (200KT thermo-nuclear). The AGM69A missile was first manufactured in 1971 - 1976 and around 1,500 were produced. There were retired over a period of time between 1991 - 1994 although there were initially removed from active service in 1990 due to fire safety concerns. This concern however did not stop the continued operational usage.
Unknown to the United Nations and many other countries the US were playing a cat and mouse game with Iraq during Gulf War 1 and it was on President George H.W. Bush's watch that things went terribly wrong during one of his major bluffs!
He had authorized a B52 Bomber to depart its Saudi Arabian Air Base loaded with SRAM Nuclear Missiles and position overhead Baghdad. We were led to believe that this aircraft only had three missiles onboard; despite the fact it could carry twenty missiles. The idea Bush had in mind was to threaten Saddam with these nuclear weapons unless he toed the line.
The B52 with a registration number of 59-2593 suddenly encountered a major electrical problem which could have been catastrophic. The aircraft commander was instructed to head south as he continued to attempt to sort out the problem.
The aircraft eventually was instructed to head for Diego Garcia in the north of the Indian Ocean. Well into this flight things started to become more critical and the crew were very much aware of their cargo of potentially unstable weapons.
The decision was made to jettison the weapons off the coast of Somalia in relative shallow water (one would assume for possible later recovery), and then proceeded on to land at Diego Garcia. The onboard electrical system had obviously become extremely critical resulting in the aircraft loosing power to its eight engines as it attempted to get back to Diego Garcia. The aircraft started to loose height and prior to arriving at the field some crew members ejected. The aircraft by this time had dropped to below its safe ejection height and the remainder of the crew ejected but failed to deploy their chutes and consequently died. The aircraft crashed into the sea 15 nautical miles north of the field on the 3rd of February 1991.
Dick Cheney was US Secretary of Defense and did not take any immediate action to recover these weapons from off the coast of Somalia at the time and consequently they were recovered by another shonky organization in May 19991 who were supposed to be a deep sea diving/ treasure salvage team who were working in the offshore Somalia area. This diving company was operating out of the Seychelles and apparently was a cover up for a South African arms smuggling operation into Somalia. The apartheid-era South African military were sending packages of conventional arms destined for groups in Somalia, and dropping them in shallow water. The divers couldn't find these packages and had to broaden their search and accidently then came across the SRAMs. They allegedly relayed their serial numbers via the UK to a retired senior officer in the USAF to find out what they were. The news from the senior officer was that these were nuclear munitions from the B-52. I should point out at this stage that the South African arms dealer was also involved in the missing UK nuclear weapons which we shall address in Part 2 of this series.
The group communicated with South Africa's defense minister, Magnus Malan who was notoriously known for his under the table arms dealings. He met the group in South Africa but told them that the deal was off as he had just been fired by De Klerk. The trail of these weapons then faded into obscurity and no one really knows there final destination. There was talk of North Korea, Iran, Syria and Iraq but we may never know. What is fact is that at one stage some nuclear weapons did end up in Iraq(US or British)but were then relocated. I feel that in actual fact one did make it to North Korea and was detonated in one of their first tests. The second test in North Korea was totally different and could have been one of the UK's missing weapons. Should this be the case then we still have two US missiles missing and possibly two UK bombs but that's another story.
There is one thing for sure that almost certainly happened and that is that the South African arms dealer ended up with much gold in his vault and other persons in the US and UK would have also had their palms brushed. Certainly in the UK senior and junior political figures became involved in both the Conservation and Labour Parties and much money to this day has not been accounted for. The greatest concern out of all of this gross neglect by the US and UK governments is one simple question.......who has got these weapons now? That is why the US, UK and dear old Israel had better watch their step when making bold threats to other countries as they may well get a very nice surprise!!......oh and please be careful when you place your vote this year as two of the two current leaders have an awful lot of secrets they don't want you to know......especially in their very secretive donations file! keep watching this space for more riveting news!
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant - 28/2/2010
Hollie wasn’t the only one that lost her childhood in Scotland
I came across an article that was floating around Scotland around the same time as Hollie’s case became public. What shocked me was not only the same people were involved in the case, Regional Procurator Fiscal - Elish Angiolini and Aberdeen Sheriff - Graeme Buchanan but also the fact that both case were dismissed because they had not come to trial within a reasonable time.
The two cased were back in 2001 and involved a little girl aged 10 years who had been sexually abused and small boy aged 7 years. It appeared ironic that this policy of kicking out such cases goes back a long long way.
When will the judicial system in Scotland understand that children endure years and years of pain and suffering because they are afraid to come forward? At some stage in their lives the children accidently come out with something that their parents pick up on or just simply reveal to their parents what had happened in their lives. |
Hollie if we can recall also slipped up when talking to her mother one day about having to go to see her father urgently otherwise he would kill her dog. This prompted mum Anne to go into more detail and so we can clearly see that one cannot put a time constraint on such cases and therefore I can only assume that something more sinister was in the minds of those that refused to take the case forward.
Here are some of the comments from various sources at the time:
In a letter to the girl, Sandra McRobert, principal procurator fiscal depute for Aberdeen, wrote: "Everyone knew that you would tell the court what happened to you if you had to, but I also know from mum that you were very scared of having to come to court. "
She said: "You have been very brave over all this and I am very sorry that because grown-ups made mistakes, you are angry because you feel (the accused) has not been punished by the courts."
The girl's family are calling for an inquiry by the Lord Advocate and investigating whether they can bring a private prosecution against the alleged attacker. George Mathers, their solicitor, said: "I believe the person accused had admitted his guilt to officers. It is a very simple and straightforward case, which should have been given priority."
The girl's father said: "My daughter feels guilt and thinks no one believes her. How do you tell a 10-year-old the system has let her down? The last three years have been traumatising for us all. My daughter's personality was completely changed after the event, but her outgoing and playful nature has helped her to cope."
This same article also reported the following: This week it also emerged that a case of a seven-year-old boy who was allegedly raped had collapsed because of delays in bringing it to court in Aberdeen. Elish Angiolini, regional procurator fiscal for Grampian, Highlands and Islands, said that she had instructed Grampian police to treat all child witness cases as custody cases, which have to be processed within 110 days.
I am astounded at the approach taken by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and Lord Advocate in Scotland Elish Angiolini in not just delaying the laws appertaining to paedophiles in Scotland but also in not allowing historical cases to come before the courts. This is pure procrastination and a delaying mechanism in order to give them all more time to plan their defence and future actions.
We already have in place a perfectly suitable Westminster legal system that caters for all of the past and current cases. One does not need to delay as all such action can be taken now by any police in any part of the United Kingdom. One can clearly see apprehension here that may also be linked to fear that all those involved must now feel. We are talking here about many many people in high positions of trust covering all sectors from Government – Judicial System – Police – Social Welfare – Nursing the list is endless.
I would expect that soon we may well see someone resign which will be the first indication that some action could be forthcoming. One can only look at the ultimate blame being placed on those that run office. The First Minister for Scotland, Alex Salmond would be very much aware of the on going “Hollie Saga” with many links to other children that have succumbed to the Paedophilia Ring. One could even possible say that this could be linked to the Dunblame Massacre, which was carried out by a known Paedophile. I am sure that many children had much vital information to offer; as and when they were prepared to be brave enough to talk about it…alas they died so innocently without being given the opportunity.
The Central Government at Westminster must now take control of this epidemic and nip it in the bud before this vile ring of Satanic Paedophiles cause someone else’s poor child to be dragged through the pain that Hollie Greig has gone through. I repeat again our children are already protected under the existing laws of Britain and all these political and judicial elite have to stop Pussy Footing around and stop this in its tracks right now.
The Prime Minister can show true leadership now by removing all those suspected of having links or being involved in Paedophilia and place them before the court system. We already know that some of these may well be very close to Number 10 and revealing them could cause much damage to any party that has such individuals in their midst……at the same time if one carried out such action I am sure it would have the reverse effect on any party by showing, we the public, fortitude and leadership qualities that we have not seen in this country for some considerable time.
As the Prime Minister has already declared he will protect our children and that surely means “Go on and do it right now” You could start off by removing Lord Advocate in Scotland Elish Angiolini, the Aberdeen Sheriff Graeme Buchanan and possibly Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill. Then you can open up a full inquiry on Hollie Greig and those other children that she has named as also being victims.
The circumstances leading up to the dismissal of this and many others cases must also be included in this inquiry and last but not least the so called suicide of Hollie’s Uncle Robert which on face value certainly appears to be a clear case of murder. Perhaps the bravery award that was handed out in relation to this car fire could be recovered and that person could also be investigated. Last but not least your highest priority would be to seek extradition orders for Hollie’s Father and Brother to be returned to the UK from Portugal. Mr Prime Minister this is not only “True Leadership” it is also about being a good father with ethical and moral values……..I am sure Hollie will not hold her breath waiting!
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant 1/2/2010
The two cased were back in 2001 and involved a little girl aged 10 years who had been sexually abused and small boy aged 7 years. It appeared ironic that this policy of kicking out such cases goes back a long long way.
When will the judicial system in Scotland understand that children endure years and years of pain and suffering because they are afraid to come forward? At some stage in their lives the children accidently come out with something that their parents pick up on or just simply reveal to their parents what had happened in their lives. |
Hollie if we can recall also slipped up when talking to her mother one day about having to go to see her father urgently otherwise he would kill her dog. This prompted mum Anne to go into more detail and so we can clearly see that one cannot put a time constraint on such cases and therefore I can only assume that something more sinister was in the minds of those that refused to take the case forward.
Here are some of the comments from various sources at the time:
In a letter to the girl, Sandra McRobert, principal procurator fiscal depute for Aberdeen, wrote: "Everyone knew that you would tell the court what happened to you if you had to, but I also know from mum that you were very scared of having to come to court. "
She said: "You have been very brave over all this and I am very sorry that because grown-ups made mistakes, you are angry because you feel (the accused) has not been punished by the courts."
The girl's family are calling for an inquiry by the Lord Advocate and investigating whether they can bring a private prosecution against the alleged attacker. George Mathers, their solicitor, said: "I believe the person accused had admitted his guilt to officers. It is a very simple and straightforward case, which should have been given priority."
The girl's father said: "My daughter feels guilt and thinks no one believes her. How do you tell a 10-year-old the system has let her down? The last three years have been traumatising for us all. My daughter's personality was completely changed after the event, but her outgoing and playful nature has helped her to cope."
This same article also reported the following: This week it also emerged that a case of a seven-year-old boy who was allegedly raped had collapsed because of delays in bringing it to court in Aberdeen. Elish Angiolini, regional procurator fiscal for Grampian, Highlands and Islands, said that she had instructed Grampian police to treat all child witness cases as custody cases, which have to be processed within 110 days.
I am astounded at the approach taken by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and Lord Advocate in Scotland Elish Angiolini in not just delaying the laws appertaining to paedophiles in Scotland but also in not allowing historical cases to come before the courts. This is pure procrastination and a delaying mechanism in order to give them all more time to plan their defence and future actions.
We already have in place a perfectly suitable Westminster legal system that caters for all of the past and current cases. One does not need to delay as all such action can be taken now by any police in any part of the United Kingdom. One can clearly see apprehension here that may also be linked to fear that all those involved must now feel. We are talking here about many many people in high positions of trust covering all sectors from Government – Judicial System – Police – Social Welfare – Nursing the list is endless.
I would expect that soon we may well see someone resign which will be the first indication that some action could be forthcoming. One can only look at the ultimate blame being placed on those that run office. The First Minister for Scotland, Alex Salmond would be very much aware of the on going “Hollie Saga” with many links to other children that have succumbed to the Paedophilia Ring. One could even possible say that this could be linked to the Dunblame Massacre, which was carried out by a known Paedophile. I am sure that many children had much vital information to offer; as and when they were prepared to be brave enough to talk about it…alas they died so innocently without being given the opportunity.
The Central Government at Westminster must now take control of this epidemic and nip it in the bud before this vile ring of Satanic Paedophiles cause someone else’s poor child to be dragged through the pain that Hollie Greig has gone through. I repeat again our children are already protected under the existing laws of Britain and all these political and judicial elite have to stop Pussy Footing around and stop this in its tracks right now.
The Prime Minister can show true leadership now by removing all those suspected of having links or being involved in Paedophilia and place them before the court system. We already know that some of these may well be very close to Number 10 and revealing them could cause much damage to any party that has such individuals in their midst……at the same time if one carried out such action I am sure it would have the reverse effect on any party by showing, we the public, fortitude and leadership qualities that we have not seen in this country for some considerable time.
As the Prime Minister has already declared he will protect our children and that surely means “Go on and do it right now” You could start off by removing Lord Advocate in Scotland Elish Angiolini, the Aberdeen Sheriff Graeme Buchanan and possibly Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill. Then you can open up a full inquiry on Hollie Greig and those other children that she has named as also being victims.
The circumstances leading up to the dismissal of this and many others cases must also be included in this inquiry and last but not least the so called suicide of Hollie’s Uncle Robert which on face value certainly appears to be a clear case of murder. Perhaps the bravery award that was handed out in relation to this car fire could be recovered and that person could also be investigated. Last but not least your highest priority would be to seek extradition orders for Hollie’s Father and Brother to be returned to the UK from Portugal. Mr Prime Minister this is not only “True Leadership” it is also about being a good father with ethical and moral values……..I am sure Hollie will not hold her breath waiting!
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant 1/2/2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
