Welcome to Peter Eyre's Space

Thank you for joining my space. The world is truly a remarkable and beautiful place but somehow we have lost our direction. Why can't we all get on together and live in peace? Why so much agression and no compassion or love for each other? Why do our leaders want to wage war in order to gain an economic advantage in controlling the natural resources of our planet? Why do such nations as the USA allow the manufacturing of weapons containing uranium components and yet profess that they are promoting disarmament? Who do they, the UK, European Countries and Israel insist in using these WMD's. I sincerely wanted to welcome you all in such a very nice and gentle way but I carry so much pain for the innocent men, women and children of past and current war zones that have sucumbed to these evil uranium weapons. We must all try to prohibit DU/EU or any other "Dirty Weapon" and learn to live in peace. We in the west have to close all bases that exist on Islamic soil and learn to trade instead of fighting. So I again welcome you to "Peter's Space" If you support war in any shape or form please do not enter my space. If you are a Christian Zionist or Jewish Zionist please do not enter my space. If however you are against war and any form of intimidation you are most welcome to take over my space.
Showing posts with label MOD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MOD. Show all posts

Thursday, 26 May 2011

Was the RAF Chinook Helicopter crash an accident or was it sabotage - Part 3

Was the RAF Chinook Helicopter crash an accident or was it sabotage - Part 3

What really happened that terrible day in June 1994?

Were all the passenger and crew assassinated?


Chinook Memorial Mull of Kintyre
PILOT: F/LT JONATHAN P.TAPPER.
PILOT: F/LT RICHARD D.COOK.
LOADMASTER: M/SGT GRAHAM W.FORBES.
LOADMASTER: SGT KEVIN A.HARDIE.
Passengers:
Asst Chief Constable: BRIAN FITZSIMONS.
Det Chief Superintendant: DESMOND CONROY.
Det Chief Superintendant: MAURICE NEILLY.
Det Superintendant: PHILLIP DAVIDSON.
Det Superintendant: ROBERT FOSTER.
Det Superintendant: BILLY GWILLIAM.
Det Superintendant: IAN PHOENIX .
Det Chief Inspector: DENIS BUNTING.
Det Inspector: STEPHEN DAVIDSON.
Det Inspector: KEVIN MAGEE.
Home Office CB-57: JOHN DEVERILL.
COLONEL: CHRISTOPHER BILES. OBE.
LT COLONEL: RICHARD GREGORY-SMITH.
LT COLONEL: JOHN TOBIAS.
LT COLONEL: GEORGE WILLIAMS.
MAJOR: CHRISTOPHER J.DOCHERTY.
MAJOR: ANTHONY HORNBY.
MAJOR: GARY SPARKS.
MAJOR: RICHARD ALLEN.
MAJOR: ROY PUGH.
ANNE JAMES.
MARTIN DALTON.
JOHN HAYNES.
MICHAEL MALTBY.
STEPHEN RICKARD.

Since writing Part 2 of this series dramatic events have now taken place resulting in another visit to the local Derby Police HQ at St Mary’s Wharf, Derby.
On Thursday the 19th of May 2011 I received a communication via my web page that deeply upset me but at the same time confirmed what I had been told by Ms Tara Andrea Davison some months ago that the crash of Chinook ZD576 was an inside job.
That communication was as follows:

01 - Name = AB
02 - Email Address = Hidden to protect the informant
03 - Your Message = AB reports that the Mull of Kintyre Chinook accident was done by an assassination hit squad.

You are correct Peter, FADEC is just the smoke screen. The pathologist a “she” who carried out an examination of all the bodies reported at that time that they all died from extensive gunshot wounds.


The weather was VFR!

The Tara story almost half confirms this. “Thing are not going to plan.”


As you can imagine I really was not prepared for this message after such a long time but then called my friend Gordon Bowden who is ex Royal Air Force and discussed its contents and told him that I would attempt to get more information before we decided what to do.

I then sent a brief message back to the informant in order to gain a more in depth understanding and also to authenticate its contents.

On Friday the 20th of May 2011 I received further communication and eventually got in touch with the person concerned for a full brief which you can read below.

I spent most of Friday going over everything and just putting my own mind at rest that this could be the true reason behind this terrible event. Later I again spoke with Gordon Bowden and we both decided that we would go to the police tomorrow Saturday 21st May 2011 to open up our previous file with this additional input (Incident No 620 07/10/2010).

The following day (Saturday 21st May 2011) we went to the Derby Police HQ at St Mary’s Wharf, Derby and eventually got to speak to a civilian who deals with front desk enquiries.

This exercise became extremely frustrating as we had to start from the beginning and it would appear that no police officers were available to deal with this report. I explained that this information is vital as it now involves the possible murder of 29 people who died in the Chinook crash at the Mull of Kintyre. I further explained that before DC Ahmed dealt with this case and handed it over to the MoD for further investigation (which I was not happy about as it was the MoD/RAF who had covered up the investigation in the first case).

The gentleman explained that no one was available as it was the weekend and suggested we come back on Monday to speak with Special Branch……we explained that we need this information to be logged for our own safety……reluctantly he accepted our information to which we received a receipt.

On Monday the 22nd May 2011 we went down to the Police HQ and asked for the detective concerned who just so happened to be at a meeting and the civil operative at the counter asked us to go home and await a call from him.

By this time Gordon and I was feeling a little put off by the police, especially considering the nature of the information (possible murder) and said that we need to see someone ASAP to have the information recorded for our own safety and we insisted that we would wait there until someone would be available.

After over one hour we still had no feedback so Gordon and I discussed lodging a complaint to the IPCC. I then went to the desk again and said what we intended doing but first I would like to speak with a senior police officer to lodge a complaint.
Eventually two detectives agreed to see us but I must say their initial mannerism was rather abrupt and to some degree sarcastic. We both went through the entire case and they told us that we must pass this on to the review committee who are dealing with the second inquiry and that our case is now closed as it was handed over to the MoD.
I explained that this was not the case because the police are now very much involved, if this information is correct, as it involves the murder of 29 people. After some considerable time I told them I know about the review committee and do intend reporting this to them but first I need to lodge it with the local police.
Reluctantly they agreed to take the evidence and enter it in the file but then the file would be closed……I was somewhat shocked at their total approach to this case.
Later that day, armed with the information I had given to the police, I emailed the Mull of Kintyre Review Board and sent them all the communications I had exchange with my informant and the details I had given the police……unfortunately is was 1716 Local Time and realised they had gone home.

On Tuesday the 22nd May 2011 I eventually got acknowledgement from Mr Passa for and on behalf of the above committee.
Below are the communications that were sent to Mr Passa at the Mull of Kintyre Review since my initial report and also the information and events since last Thursday night:

Please note some information has been removed to protect the persons concerned

Fw: RE: Chinook Part 2
Monday, 23 May, 2011 17:16

From "PETER EYRE"

To Alexander.Passa@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk, Ada.Munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk
:
Cc rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk, peter.eyre

Message contains attachments
2 Files (159KB) | Download All
• Letter to Chinook Review Team - 1.dot
• Ack letter from Chinok Inquiry.jpg
For the attention of the Mull of Kintyre Review Board


Urgent

The Rt Hon Lord Philip, Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP, the Rt Hon the Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and the Rt Hon the Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke.
Ladies and Gentlemen

You will recall my submission sent to you regarding the accident of Chinook ZD576 2/6/1994 and the information that I had received by telephone from an ex government Intel Operative Ms Tara Andrea Davison (the contents of the telephone call were noted by the Derby Police HQ, St Mary’s Wharf, Derby under incident number 620 dated 07/10/2010).

In this report I highlighted the following:

• Why wasn’t the possibility of inside or outside sabotage or external control of the aircraft looked at more deeply? This had been discussed at other aircraft accidents but did not play a significant part in this inquiry. The status and importance of the passengers onboard would have certainly made this a distinct possibility.

In regard to the latter i.e. that of sabotage; I have myself received vital information, from a very senior ex intelligence officer, that this was an inside job. It was during a very lengthy conversation on the 4th of August 2010 that this person disclosed that the Chinook was not an accident but one that had been planned from the office where the intelligence officer had previously worked (this person was not involved)..


You will also recall as per my communications below that I said the following:


Regarding my previous report to you (as delivered by hand) and subsequent emails on the subject of the review of the Chinook accident at the Mull of Kintyre.

Would you please confirm that you will make arrangements for the informant Ms Tara Andrea Davison to be questioned regarding her comments made to me "that this was an inside job" etc to have this aspect of the accident cleared up once and for all?

It would be extremely unprofessional not to do so.


I also passed comment about the TV interview carried out by the Strathclyde Police on the night in question when they gave a strong emphasis that there was nothing suspicious about this crash and that it was clearly a terrible tragic accident etc.


My response to your team was that the Strathclyde Police had no jurisdiction or authority to make such a comment as this was clearly not a police matter and should have been left the aviation experts that were called in to investigate the crash and the circumstances leading up to it.


I have now received a very important communication from a person who at this stage wishes to remain anonymous that strengthens the first report that I received from the Intel Operative i.e. that this was an inside job.

Below is the wording of that communication as it was received:

Time of receipt - Thursday 19th May at 1952 Local Time

To Peter Eyre

01 - Name = ABt
02 - Email Address = f
03 - Your Message = AB reports that the Mull of Kintyre Chinook accident was done by an assassination hit squad.

You are correct Peter, FADEC is just the smoke screen. The pathologist a “she” who carried out an examination of all the bodies reported at that time that they all died from extensive gunshot wounds.

The weather was VFR!

The Tara story almost half confirms this. “Thing are not going to plan.”


------------------


I responded to this by sending the following:


Sent Thursday 19th of May at 2043 Local time


From Peter Eyre


To F


It is rather strange because this morning I was actually thinking about that....the fact that some could have survived and they would have had to do this........how can you authenticate this....how did you know the coroners report or have access to it.....I presume you are in Scotland and how come this has now been let our the bag before......I know it was an intended crash and I know that the navy seals are also on the island with some very secret testing facility etc........please feed more to me if you can

Peter
-------------------

The following was F.......... response

Received Friday 20/5/2010 at 1208 Local Time

From F

To Peter Eyre


Good Morning Peter,

It’s the old story… It’s like trying to drown the rubber duck in the bath and eventually you get fed up and it pop’s up to the surface…truth always comes to the surface.

The whole incident just doesn’t add up. Flying top brass from Belfast to Fort George or Inverness for a meeting is strange. Why Inverness ? Fort George is the barracks for the Black Watch. The military must have secure locating in Northern Ireland , so why Inverness . If they wanted too meet on the UK mainland why not Blackpool or Prestwick London for that matter. It’s ridiculous going to Fort George .

The mode of transport is also suspect. Chinook is a very capable aircraft but it’s slow and noisy. It would have been cold down the back. Why were these senior people being headed into a cattle truck, when they could have flown BA to London ? Or BA to Edinburgh ? The HQ for the army in Scotland is two minutes from Edinburgh Airport , it must be secure, no Fort George was the destination so that they had to fly over the Mull of Kintyre.

The weather was VFR. The RAF wouldn’t operate to these regulations but the Met man does and so this gives us an indication of the weather.

VFR Flight Rules.

Below FL 100
5 km flight visibility, 1500m horizontally from cloud, 1000ft vertically from cloud
At or below 3000ft
For fixed wing aircraft operating at 140kt or less 5 km flight visibility Clear of cloud and in sight of surface
For helicopter Clear of cloud and in sight of surface.

Any pilot regardless of his training always keeps and eye on high ground, cloud and his position with both. To suggest as the media do that they flew into terrain is stretching it a bit.

We can authenticate this by either obtaining the coroners report, or getting a statement from the women coroner. The problem with this is that her life could be in danger. These are very very serious issues and allegations Peter.

As with everything compartmentalisation is at play here. The coroner just did her job, it wouldn’t occur to her that this was an execution. We don’t do these things in Britain do we? Remember she was a woman, I do think that’s significant. She would be thinking Army - Northern Ireland – guns - helicopters- and so these things are quite normal to her.

The Mull of Kintyre is the perfect place for this its very remote even at the best of times. It’s interesting you say Navy Seals were in the area. I was thinking this as well. I think they were executed in the air, and the assassins parachuted out the back into the sea, and then picked up by your seals. The aircraft then flew into the hillside. I don’t think it’s possible to survive an air crash like that.

It was reported to me that the Coroner said “they all had gunshot wounds to the head”

An enquiry led by Lord Philip is taking place in Edinburgh . Three privy councilors Malcolm Bruce MP, Lord Forsyth and Baroness Liddell will make sure that we talk about FADEC and computer errors. This means the pilots can be pardoned and it’s all blamed on the humble microchip.


-------------------------------


This was F reply:


From F


To Peter Eyre

Received Friday 20th May at 1539 Local Time.

Indeed Peter,

This is quite interesting. You say you have submitted a report to Lord Phillip, so I assume that would be on the basis of the information Tara provided. One has to wonder what they were doing wrong that they all deserved to die.

Do you think this is MI5?

They don’t want people like you and I looking under the carpet! They blamed the pilots.

-----------------------

I then responded to F with the following and also attached my report and receipt to the Review Board as follows:

Sent on Friday 20.5.2011 at 1605 Local Time

To F


From Peter Eyre

Hello F

I have attached my own investigation/summary of events based on the information I had at the time and naturally added that an Intel Operative had given me inside information.....I made sure it was delivered by hand to EDI for the attention of Lord Phillip and the board....I also insisted in obtaining a receipt.

I also later sent them a letter insisting that the person who gave me th information be pulled in for an interview without delay

I will give you a bell.......

Peter

-------------------------------------

I then spoke with F for some considerable time who against voiced his concerns for the safety of the person who examined the bodies.......in this regard, for that persons protection we will obtain details for our own files on this review.

All communications are thus duplicated and distributed to other third parties within the UK and overseas for our own protection.

Certain Political figures have also been notified and media outlets in the event of persons coming to harm.

Regarding the first report to you with the information received from the Intel Operative.....this information was recorded by the Derby Police as per the above reference number of 620 07/10/2010 and was eventually passed onto the MoD as they considered this not to be a police matter.

However, Now that there are indications that the cause of death may be other than from what one could expect in an air accident this has now become a police matter.

Both myself and Mr Gordon Bowden attended the Police at Derby St Mary's Wharf HQ on both Saturday and again today. After some delay we insisted that we be interviewed to have this statement put on record owing to the nature of the information and as added protection for Gordon and I.

We were interviewed by DS Burns 1884 and DC Palmer-Coole 457
Interviewed commenced at 1145 and finished at 1335.

Both the above advised us that this information should be passed onto the review board which I told them I was doing anyway, but insisted that the Police record this communication to add to the police file that we started back in October 2010.

They both told us that the file had been closed however; we both insisted that it be opened again and this information be entered as it could, if correct, now possible become a multiple murder inquiry.

They agreed to receive the information and record it and that we pass it to you for your attention ASAP.

in view of the nature of this information and its connection to the previous report from Ms Tara Andrea Davison, I am sure you would agree that there is serious cause for concern.

Please find attached my original report and your receipt.

May I now request that you both acknowledge receipt of this email by return email.

Your Sincerely


Peter Eyre


Aviation Consultant – Senior Operations Officer Airline/Helicopter – SAR Coordinator.



--- On Tue, 19/4/11, Alexander.Passa@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk wrote:

For the attention of the Mull of Kintyre Review Board

From: Alexander.Passa@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: RE: Chinook Part 2
To: peter.eyre
Cc: Ada.Munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Date: Tuesday, 19 April, 2011, 9:21

Dear Mr Eyre,

Thank you for your email of 18 April 2011.

As Secretary to the Review I am responding on behalf of Lord Philip and his panel.

As you will no doubt be aware, the Mull of Kintyre Review’s stated policy is that any material or comment provided is done so in strict confidence. The Review will not comment on, or release any material prior to the Review’s publication. It would be wholly inappropriate to enter into any correspondence regarding any line of inquiry the Review is taking or with whom the panel has spoken.

Regards

Alex Passa
Secretary to the Mull of Kintyre Review
1 Melville Crescent
Edinburgh, EH3 7HW

www.mullofkintyrereview.org.uk/

________________________________________
From: PETER EYRE
Sent: 18 April 2011 17:05
To: enquires@mullofkintyrereview.org.uk; Munns A (Ada)
Subject: Fw: Chinook Part 2

To:

The Rt Hon Lord Philip, Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP, the Rt Hon the Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and the Rt Hon the Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke.
Good Afternoon

Regarding my previous report to you (as delivered by hand) and subsequent emails on the subject of the review of the Chinook accident at the Mull of Kintyre.

Would you please confirm that you will make arrangements for the informant Ms Tara Andrea Davison to be questioned regarding her comments made to me "that this was an inside job" etc to have this aspect of the accident cleared up once and for all?

It would be extremely unprofessional not to do so.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email when convenient
Peter Eyre


Aviation Consultant - Ex Senior Operations Officer (Airline and Helicopter) - Ex Search and Rescue Coordinator(Helicopters)


I would just like to point out to all those that were in power at the time of this tragedy and the positions they held.

John Major – Ex Prime Minister
Michael Heseltine – Ex President of the Board of Trade
Malcolm Rifkind – Secretary of State for Defence

Gordon Bowden then decided to send a copy of my communication to the usual bunch of politicians that simply do nothing……..can you believe that right across the board they have ignored all the major serious fraud (amounting to billions of pounds), ignored out report on the Chinook, ignored our concerns regarding the continuous use of depleted uranium in Libya and ignored our information regarding the three nuclear bombs that were lost in Oman.

So I ask the question why are these people in power if they cannot safeguard our country or act on our behalf?

Below is the communication that was sent by Gordon and I can assure you that he will not even get an acknowledgement!!!

From: gordon bowden
To: scotlandp@parliament.uk
Cc: john.healey.mp@parliament.uk; chris.williamson.mp@parliament.uk; beckettm@parliament.uk; info@davidcameron.com; info@derbyconservatives.co.uk; info@derbylabourparty.co.uk; info@libdems.org.uk; feedback@peterlilley.co.uk; reportingafraud@sfo.gsi.gov.uk
Sent: Tue, 24 May, 2011 10:59:40
Subject: Fw: RE: Chinook Part 2

Dear Baroness Scotland

Under your Public Service remit, in the Public Interest, I forward you additional information that must be examined for authenticity by yourself and Senior Labour Party leadership, this in regard to the Political and criminal implications of the contents of the Forward e-mail communications to the new review board of the Mull of Kintyre fatal military Chinook crash . ZD 576 on the 2/6/1994 contained in the forwarded attached list of sequential e-mail communications below.

The additional information was provided by a protected source, indicating and making accusation that the 29 Victims of Chinook ZD 576 were examined by a female appointed Coroner and the cause of death being
"GUN SHOT WOUNDS TO THE HEAD"
It was recorded to you in communications from myself previously, that this was said to be an act of deliberate Government colluded sabotage of that Military Flight, further to the Government corruption accusations recovered in open written Internet disclosures of Ms Tara Andrea Davison.

As yourself and the Cc recipients will recall, at the Nottingham Labour Party "New Idea's Forum" and other venues, you were recorded and presented a copy of a one Page document.
(The Attachment) of over 400 Pages of Documents I recovered from the Internet website of Ms Tara Andrea Davison.
http://www.afbio.co.uk

Recovered without copyright, disclosures of Ms Tara Andrea Davisona Circ 1989-1994 an ex Senior Civil Servant, ex Arms to Iraq Investigator and Intelligence Advisor to the Select Committee of the DTI under MP Peter Lilley.
As is contained in her verbiage, she discloses that "Classified" Documents, files, micro film, personal correspondence communications between herself and Senior members of the House of Lords and Government agencies along with evidence vital to the "Public" CHILCOTT IRAQ INQUIRY were seized by 13 Male Derbyshire Police under a proceeds of Crime Court Order signed by Judge Burgess and the arresting Police team headed by DC 1518 Stephen Winnard.

As Ms Tara Andrea Davison makes legal statement in this disclosure and further in my recovered documents from her (now removed) web site:http://www.afbio.co.uk of evidence that implicates the previous Conservative Government in criminal and corruption actions, in the covert supplying of WMD to IRAQ, IRAN and other Countries.

Within her statements are also disclosures that the Derbyshire Police seized other documents and files that relate to evidence recovered by herself as a Paedophile Ring Investigator that was also provided to the previous Labour PM Tony Blair containing names and identities of Senior Police Officers and Government VIP's who were involved as active participants in these Paedophile networks.

It is also recorded that Ms Tara Andrea Davison has also made legal statement to another Derbyshire resident Mr Peter Eyre that, at her time of employment as a Senior Civil Servant and Intelligence Advisor to the Select Committee of the DTI, from her Government Office, that the tragic fatal crash of Military Helicopter Chinook ZD 576 at the Mull of Kintyre on the 2/6/1994 was planned an act of deliberate sabotage orchestrated and auctioned by senior Government agents.

Details of this disclosure and the other related evidence contained in these recovered official documents from the personal website of Ms Tara Andrea Davison http://www.afbio.co.uk were made known by myself Mr Gordon Bowden in an interview with DC Cyples and DC Rigby at Derbyshire St Mary's Wharf Police Station recorded as Incident Number 620-07/10/2010

As an ex RAF Engineer, Service Number T8079670 it is further my Duty of Care, to ensure yourself Baroness Scotland and the list of Cc Recipients of this Communication, record and act in your official remit Government capacity, to investigate the accuracy of these serious allegations, made by an ex Senior Civil Servant and Arms to Iraq investigator to establish that NO vital evidence, relevant to the Public "OPEN" Chilcott Iraq Inquiry is being withheld by the Derbyshire Police, for and under instruction by any Political Party that may further pervert the course of Justice.

I have requested (Recorded) from yourself and the list of Cc recipients previously, that you immediately take action under your Government Position remit and acknowledge receipt of the copy of the Attachment declaration by Ms Tara Andrea Davison and copies of the 2 e-mail correspondences to the New Chinook review inquiry Team
Sincerely

Mr Gordon Bowden




-----------------------------------
From: PETER EYRE
To: ralph, bigdee, flipseal, romac100, dickhadlow
Cc: rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk; peter.eyre
Sent: Mon, 23 May, 2011 21:12:00
Subject: Fw: RE: Chinook Part 2

Dear All
I appreciate that you all may not wish to receive this communication
but I am duty bound to pass this on to the original civil team for
obvious reasons. The police have been notified and the Lord Philip
review team.
From my perspective we cannot say one way or the other without
opening up another autopsy on one or all the victims.......one thing I
can say for sure is the importance of an interview with the original
informant Ms Tara Andrea Davison who first advised me that this
was an inside job.
All I can say is that the areas that Gordon and I are currently dealing
in is highly dangerous and in that context I am sending this
information to you all for safe keeping, should Gordon, I or others
become victims also.

I accept that this information may not be true but I can say for sure
that the origin of this message was from a reliable source who
had access to No10.
Read below the communications exchanged.

You may choose to acknowledge receipt of this message but
at the same time if you do not then I fully understand.
Peter Eyre
Aviation Consultant – Senior Operations Officer Airline/Helicopter –
SAR Coordinator.

Date: Monday, 23 May, 2011, 17:47

For your record

Peter

--- On Mon, 23/5/11, PETER EYRE wrote:


From: PETER EYRE
Subject: Fw: RE: Chinook Part 2
To: Alexander.Passa@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk, Ada.Munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk, peter.eyre
Date: Monday, 23 May, 2011, 17:16

For the attention of the Mull of Kintyre Review Board

Urgent

The Rt Hon Lord Philip, Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP, the Rt Hon the Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and the Rt Hon the Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke.
Ladies and Gentlemen
You will recall my submission sent to you regarding the accident of
Chinook ZD576 2/6/1994 and the information that I had received by telephone from an ex government Intel Operative Ms Tara Andrea Davison (the contents of the telephone call were noted by the Derby Police HQ, St Mary’s Wharf, Derby under incident number 620 dated 07/10/2010).
In this report I highlighted the following:
• Why wasn’t the possibility of inside or outside sabotage or external control of the aircraft looked at more deeply? This has been discussed at other aircraft accidents but did not play a significant part in this inquiry. The status and importance of the passengers onboard would have certainly made this a distinct possibility.
In regard to the latter i.e. that of sabotage; I have myself received vital information, from a very senior ex intelligence officer, that this was an inside job. It was during a very lengthy conversation on the 4th of August 2010 that this person disclosed that the Chinook was not an accident but one that had been planned from the office where the intelligence officer had previously worked.


You will also recall as per my communications below that I said the following:


Regarding my previous report to you (as delivered by hand) and subsequent emails on the subject of the review of the Chinook accident at the Mull of Kintyre.

Would you please confirm that you will make arrangements for the informant Ms Tara Andrea Davison to be questioned regarding her comments made to me "that this was an inside job" etc to have this aspect of the accident cleared up once and for all?

It would be extremely unprofessional not to do so.


I also passed comment about the TV interview carried out by the Strathclyde Police on the night in question when they gave a strong emphasis that there was nothing suspicious about this crash and that it was clearly a terrible tragic accident etc.


My response to your team was that the Strathclyde Police had no juristriction or authority to make such a comment as this was clearly not a police matter and should have been left the the aviation experts that were called in to investigate the crash and the circumstances leading up to it.


I have now received a very important communication from a person who at this stage wishes to remain anominous that strengthens the first report that I received from the Intel Operative i.e. that this was an inside job.

Below is the wording of that communication as it was received:

Time of receipt - Thursday 19th May at 1952 Local Time

To Peter Eyre

01 - Name = AB
02 - Email Address = f
03 - Your Message = AB reports that the Mull of Kintyre Chinook accident was done by an assassination hit squad.

You are correct Peter, FADEC is just the smoke screen. The pathologist a “she” who carried out an examination of all the bodies reported at that time that they all died from extensive gunshot wounds.

The weather was VFR!

The Tara story almost half confirms this. “Thing are not going to plan.”


------------------


I responded to this by sending the following:


Sent Thursday 19th of May at 2043 Local time


From Peter Eyre


To F


It is rather strange because this morning I was actually thinking about that....the fact that some could have survived and they would have had to do this........how can you authenticate this....how did you know the coroners report or have access to it.....I presume you are in Scotland and how come this has now been let our the bag before......I know it was an intended crash and I know that the navy seals are also on the island with some very secret testing facility etc........please feed more to me if you can

Peter
-------------------

The following was F.......... response

Received Friday 20/5/2010 at 1208 Local Time

From F

To Peter Eyre

Good Morning Peter,

It’s the old story… It’s like trying to drown the rubber duck in the bath and eventually you get fed up and it pop’s up to the surface…truth always comes to the surface.

I’m also have a keen interest in developments over the years.

The whole incident just doesn’t add up. Flying top brass from Belfast to Fort George or Inverness for a meeting is strange. Why Inverness ? Fort George is the barracks for the Black Watch. The military must have secure locating in Northern Ireland , so why Inverness . If they wanted too meet on the UK mainland why not Blackpool or Prestwick London for that matter. It’s ridiculous going to Fort George .

The mode of transport is also suspect. Chinook is a very capable aircraft but it’s slow and noisy. It would have been cold down the back. Why were these senior people being headed into a cattle truck, when they could have flown BA to London ? Or BA to Edinburgh ? The HQ for the army in Scotland is two minutes from Edinburgh Airport , it must be secure, no Fort George was the destination so that they had to fly over the Mull of Kintyre.

The weather was VFR. The RAF wouldn’t operate to these regulations but the Met man does and so this gives us an indication of the weather.

VFR Flight Rules.

Below FL 100
5 km flight visibility, 1500m horizontally from cloud, 1000ft vertically from cloud
At or below 3000ft
For fixed wing aircraft operating at 140kt or less 5 km flight visibility Clear of cloud and in sight of surface
For helicopter Clear of cloud and in sight of surface.

Any pilot regardless of his training always keeps and eye on high ground, cloud and his position with both. To suggest as the media do that they flew into terrain is stretching it a bit.

We can authenticate this by either obtaining the coroners report, or getting a statement from the women coroner. The problem with this is that her life could be in danger. These are very very serious issues and allegations Peter.

As with everything compartmentalisation is at play here. The corner just did her job, it wouldn’t occur to her that this was an execution. We don’t do these things in Britain do we. Remember she was a women, I do think that’s significant. She would be thinking Army - Northern Ireland – guns - helicopters- and so these things are quite normal to her.

The Mull of Kintyre is the perfect place for this its very remote even at the best of times. It’s interesting you say Navy Seals were in the area. I was thinking this as well. I think they were executed in the air, and the assassins parachuted out the back into the sea, and then picked up by your seals. The aircraft then flew into the hillside. I don’t think it’s possible to survive an air crash like that.

It was reported to me that the Coroner said “they all had gunshot wounds to the head” The coroner told her brother … just in the passing…the brother told me…

An enquiry led by Lord Philip is taking place in Edinburgh . Three privy councilors Malcolm Bruce MP, Lord Forsyth and Baroness Liddell will make sure that we talk about FADEC and computer errors. This means the pilots can be pardoned and it’s all blamed on the humble microchip.


-----------------------------


This was F reply:


From F


To Peter Eyre


Received Friday 20th May at 1539 Local Time.


Indeed Peter,

This is quite interesting. You say you have submitted a report to Lord Phillip, so I assume that would be on the basis of the information Tara provided. One has to wonder what they were doing wrong that they all deserved to die.

Do you think this is MI5?

They don’t want people like you and I looking under the carpet! They blamed the pilots.

-----------------------

I then responded to F with the following and also attached my report and receipt to the Review Board as follows:


Sent on Friday 20.5.2011 at 1605 Local Time


To F


From Peter Eyre


Hello F

I have attached my own investigation/summary of events based on the information I had at the time and naturally added that an Intel Operative had given me inside information.....I made sure it was delivered by hand to EDI for the attention of Lord Phillip and the board....I also insisted in obtaining a receipt.

I also later sent them a letter insisting that the person who gave me the information be pulled in for an interview without delay

I will give you a bell.......

Peter
-------------------------------------

I than spoke with F for some considerable time who against voiced his concerns for the safety of the person who examined the bodies.......in this regard, for that persons protection we will obtain details for our own files on this review.

All communications are thus duplicated and distributed to other third parties within the UK and overseas for our own protection.

Certain Political figures have also been notified and media outlets in the event of persons coming to harm.

Regarding the first report to you with the information received from the Intel Operative.....this information was recorded by the Derby Police as per the above reference number of 620 07/10/2010 and was eventually passed onto the MoD as they considered this not to be a police matter.

However, Now that there are indications that the cause of death may be other than from what one could expect in an air accident this has now become a police matter.

Both myself and Mr Gordon Bowden attended the Police at Derby St Mary's Wharf HQ on both Saturday and again today. After some delay we insisted that we be interviewed to have this statement put on record owing to the nature of the information and as added protection for Gordon and I.

We were interviewed by DS Burns 1884 and DC Palmer-Coole 457
Interviewed commenced at 1145 and finished at 1335.

Both the above advised us that this information should be passed onto the review board which I told them I was doing anyway, but insisted that the Police record this communication to add to the police file that we started back in October 2010.

They both told us that the file had been closed however; we both insisted that it be opened again and this information be entered as it could, if correct, now possible become a multiple murder inquiry.

They agreed to receive the information and record it and that we pass it to you for your attention asap.

in view of the nature of this information and its connection to the previous report from Ms Tara Andrea Davison, I am sure you would agree that there is serious cause for concern.

Please find attached my original report and your receipt.

May I now request that you both acknowledge receipt of this email by return email.

Your Sincerely


Peter Eyre


Aviation Consultant – Senior Operations Officer Airline/Helicopter – SAR Coordinator.

--- On Tue, 19/4/11, Alexander.Passa@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk wrote:

For the attention of the Mull of Kintyre Review Board

From: Alexander.Passa@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: RE: Chinook Part 2
To: peter.eyre7@btinternet.com
Cc: Ada.Munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Date: Tuesday, 19 April, 2011, 9:21

Dear Mr Eyre,

Thank you for your email of 18 April 2011.

As Secretary to the Review I am responding on behalf of Lord Philip and his panel.

As you will no doubt be aware, the Mull of Kintyre Review’s stated policy is that any material or comment provided is done so in strict confidence. The Review will not comment on, or release any material prior to the Review’s publication. It would be wholly inappropriate to enter into any correspondence regarding any line of inquiry the Review is taking or with whom the panel has spoken.

Regards


Alex Passa
Secretary to the Mull of Kintyre Review
1 Melville Crescent
Edinburgh, EH3 7HW

www.mullofkintyrereview.org.uk/

________________________________________
From: PETER EYRE [mailto:peter.eyre7@btinternet.com]
Sent: 18 April 2011 17:05
To: enquires@mullofkintyrereview.org.uk; Munns A (Ada)
Subject: Fw: Chinook Part 2

To:

The Rt Hon Lord Philip, Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP, the Rt Hon the Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and the Rt Hon the Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke.
Good Afternoon

Regarding my previous report to you (as delivered by hand) and subsequent emails on the subject of the review of the Chinook accident at the Mull of Kintyre.

Would you please confirm that you will make arrangements for the informant Ms Tara Andrea Davison to be questioned regarding her comments made to me "that this was an inside job" etc to have this aspect of the accident cleared up once and for all?

It would be extremely unprofessional not to do so.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email when convenient

Peter Eyre


Aviation Consultant - Ex Senior Operations Officer (Airline and Helicopter) - Ex Search and Rescue Coordinator(Helicopters)



I guess by now you are really thinking do things like this really happen here in the UK….well my friends we are only just touching the surface. Try counting up the numerous false flags including 9/11, 7/7, Time Square New York, Detroit attempting airline bombing, UPS ink jet bomb UK, South Korea Navy Corvette sinking and so many more…….the best and most ridiculous being the killing of, Bin Laden recently when he had actually died in December 2001 due to renal failure in the Rwalpindi Hospital……..when will you all see and understand that the axis of evil lies right here in the West. Soon you will see the take over of Libya…… with Syria and Iran on the horizon with more work still to be done in Yemen, Somalia and Sudan…..then as they say “Job Done.”

In closing I would just like to point out that I did made contact with the father of Flt Lt Tapper (who was the commander of the Chinook) and briefed him of my two reports…..it was extremely difficult for me to do this but owing to the distance between us I was not able to meet with him and do it more professionally. He explained to me that he had got over this and that he would speak with Alex Passa directly. He later left a message to say he had spoken with Alex and that he did not want to be further involved in this and that he would leave it in the hands of Alex Passa.

I must say that since my first communications with Ms Tara Davison there has been a very strong reluctance by the police to take a statement on this tragic event. It became evident that they certainly did not want to be involved with it at a local level and the very fact that Monday was the first time I had been interviewed certainly reflects a cover up. Surely the failure to investigate these serious claims is in itself a breach of the Police Discipline Code.

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 13/4/2011
www.eyreinternational.wordpress.com

Sunday, 8 May 2011

The US and UK Governments extend their talons over Libya – Part 20

Libyan cities about to witness hell on earth!!


Predator armed with Hellfire Missiles

U.S. President Barack Obama has approved the use of armed Predator drones in Libya, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday
The use of drones armed with these missiles has received much criticism in their area of operation. They are normally controlled by the USAF and the CIA and have a very bad track record on grounds of safety. We are told that these will be controlled by the US Defense Department from the West Coast of the US. The operators are professional pilots and fly them just like a computer game.

UAV Control Centre

So what can we expect in Libya after the massive bombardment of depleted uranium weapons……….as I have already indicated a sort of “Hell on Earth with many innocent civilian casualties.

So what are the statistics in Afghanistan:
2009 - Of the 44 Predator strikes carried out by the American drones in the tribal areas of Pakistan in 12 months of 2009, only five were able to hit their actual targets, killing five key Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders, but at the cost of around 700innocent civilian lives.

The article gave a comparison that for every single person taken out it means the death of 140 innocent civilians..

2010 - According to the Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik, U.S. drone strikes killed more than 900 people in Pakistan last year, the vast majority of whom were civilians, often women and children.

2011 - Defense Department officials said that a Hellfire missile killed a Marine and a Navy seaman in Afghanistan. The two U.S. troops were supposedly mistaken for "militants."

The statistics are alarming and in this context Obama is simply adding to the civilian death toll making him guilty of war crimes.

It is interesting to note that British Apache pilots complained that standard Hellfire missiles were going straight through buildings and out of the other side.......once can see that this will clearly increase the number of innocent civilians.

The missiles themselves are horrendous to say the least and are described as follows:
The missile creates a pressure wave which sucks the air out of victims, shreds their internal organs and crushes their bodies. The explosion is described as “Thermobaric” and is known to contain depleted uranium.


The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has admitted to the use of the weapons, condemned by human rights groups as “brutal.”


Hellfire missile on Predator (inscription "In Memory of Honorable Ronald Reagan) - What a fitting tribute to such a bad President don’t you think?

I was shocked to hear experts talking about these drones and their missiles as being perfectly suitable for suburban warfare and yet statistics and figures do not agree with their comments!!.......the drones and missiles will certainly add to the civilian causalities.

We are now getting regular updates from senior US military staff and also from other political figures in Europe that the situation in Libya is at a standstill and indications are that some of them are pushing for ground troops, which is totally against the UN Resolution remit.

It should also be noted that we are now getting condemnation from the US and UK on the situation that is ongoing in Syria. We have to remember that the US has made it clear in past discussions that Syria is certainly the possible next target, followed by Iran.

Hellfire Missile hits it target (depleted uranium)

I have noticed over the last week or so that many pro depleted uranium supporters are saying that depleted uranium is not only safe but it is also a weapon that is so vital for coalition forces. This is also the stance of our own MoD Dr.Liam Fox……..they are certainly poorly advised and one will soon see the results of this war within the next 6 months or so as a dramatic rise in cancer takes over and gross birth defects. Misarata could well turn into another Falujah!


Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 22/4/2011 www.eyreinternational.com

Saturday, 16 April 2011

Was the RAF Chinook Helicopter crash an accident or was it sabotage? - Part 2

Was the RAF Chinook Helicopter crash an accident or was it sabotage?
Part 2

I believe it was sabotaged!

What really happened that terrible day in June 1994?

Chinook ZD576

The wreckage of RAF Chinook ZD 576 in which 29 people died

PILOT: F/LT JONATHAN P.TAPPER.
PILOT: F/LT RICHARD D.COOK.
LOADMASTER: M/SGT GRAHAM W.FORBES.
LOADMASTER: SGT KEVIN A.HARDIE.
Passengers:
Asst Chief Constable: BRIAN FITZSIMONS.
Det Chief Superintendant: DESMOND CONROY.
Det Chief Superintendant: MAURICE NEILLY.
Det Superintendant: PHILLIP DAVIDSON.
Det Superintendant: ROBERT FOSTER.
Det Superintendant: BILLY GWILLIAM.
Det Superintendant: IAN PHOENIX .
Det Chief Inspector: DENIS BUNTING.
Det Inspector: STEPHEN DAVIDSON.
Det Inspector: KEVIN MAGEE.
Home Office CB-57: JOHN DEVERILL.
COLONEL: CHRISTOPHER BILES. OBE.
LT COLONEL: RICHARD GREGORY-SMITH.
LT COLONEL: JOHN TOBIAS.
LT COLONEL: GEORGE WILLIAMS.
MAJOR: CHRISTOPHER J.DOCHERTY.
MAJOR: ANTHONY HORNBY.
MAJOR: GARY SPARKS.
MAJOR: RICHARD ALLEN.
MAJOR: ROY PUGH.
ANNE JAMES.
MARTIN DALTON.
JOHN HAYNES.
MICHAEL MALTBY.
STEPHEN RICKARD.



In order to keep you up to date with the progress of events I decided to send Part 1 to many politicians and other interested parties. I obviously have not included Part 1 as an attachment in this report as you already know of its contents. However, I have included below the introduction that I sent showing their email addresses and the text:

From: Peter Eyre 12th April 2011
To:
beckettm@parliament.uk, scotlandp@parliament.uk, john.healey.mp@parliament.uk, info@davidcameron.com, info@derbyconservatives.co.uk, info@derbylabourparty.co.uk, info@libdems.org.uk, chris@chrishuhne.org.uk, fife_office@mingcampbell.org.uk, feedback@peterlilley.co.uk, ranjit.banwait@live.co.uk, williamss@parliament.uk, michael.carr@derby.gov.uk, tuplin17@tiscali.co.uk, Robert.troup@derby.gov.uk, margaret.hird@derby.gov.uk, lonny.wilsoncroft@derby.gov.uk, reportingafraud@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, peter.eyre7@btinternet.com, chris.williamson.mp@parliament.uk, fife_office@mingcampbell.org.uk, feedback@peterlilley.co.uk, williamss@parliament.uk, ranjit.banwait@live.co.uk, info@crossreach.org.uk, readers@forbes.com, newseditor@independent.co.uk, home.news@thetimes.co.uk, rights@guardian.co.uk, national@guardian.co.uk, paul.hutcheon@sundayherald.com, webeditor@dailyrecord.co.uk, reporters@dailyrecord.co.uk

Cc: Ralph. kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com, bigdee@blueyonder.co.uk, romac100@hotmail.com, dickhadlow@hotmail.com

Hello all

I am aware of the latest report given out today regarding other possible causes for the crash of Chinook ZD576 at the Mull of Kintyre ie FADEC or whatever.

It is also of concern to me that I have made it known that I was about to release the above article today regarding that of possible sabotage.

From my perspective having worked the helicopter scene for some years I still have some grave concerns about the possible outcome.

I had passed on my concerns to Lord Phillip having received the contact details from Capt Ralph Kohn (as per the article above) and in this letter I state that either way it certainly was not crew error.

Having painfully followed this through up to the current time I still insist that the person who gave me the sabotage story be interviewed by the police owing to the fact that her previous background gave her Intel access at the highest level in both the DTI and also to No10 and in that context makes her a reliable witness.

In the event that this was not the case then either way the good work carried out by Ralph Kohn and the team shows clearly a cover-up was embarked upon by the MoD and that the original concerns by Capt Kohn and team were perfectly valid.

I therefore insist that Ms Tara Andrea Davison (or possibly Ms Tara Andrea Biggs-Davison) be called upon to give evidence under oath and recorded to put the records straight.

Once this has been put to bed, then we can move forward into a correct inquiry. However, it is still a remarkable coincidence that this story has broken on the same day of my planned article release.......one would assume that in order to hide a possible inside job (Sabotage) it is better to accept the lesser charge of mechanical failure and pass the blame onto the MoD and Boeing (if Ms Davison was correct),

Finally what is also deeply suspicious is the fact that never would you allow 25 of the most experienced terrorism experts from the Police - Army - MI5 travel on the same aircraft.....having myself worked in high level security this is a clear no no in both the military and civil aviation.......the same also applies in the corporate sector.

It is for this reason that I send you all a copy of my article in the hope that this investigations also takes into account possible sabotage........I was shocked that this aspect was never taken into account, despite the level of VIP that were on this tragic flight.

My final comment was also who gave the Chief Constable of Strathclyde the authority to make the announcement immediately after the crash that there was nothing suspicious about this crash........this was against normal protocol as it is up to the investigation team/board (attending to crash scene) to decide the cause of the crash........I believe that some very serious flaws exist in this past and current inquiry and also the fact that both Gordon Bowden and myself were not allowed to give a sworn statement to the police under oath??

Yours Sincerely

Peter Eyre

Aviation Consultant - Ex Senior Operations Officer (Airline and Helicopter) - Ex Search and Rescue Coordinator (Helicopters)
------------------------------
I decided that I would send a totally separate email to the Mull of Kintyre Review Board this morning and at the same time gain acknowledgement of receipt details of which are shown below:

Ref: Separate email to the Mull of Kintyre Review Board and Cc others

Wednesday, 13 April, 2011 9:39
From : peter.eyre7@btinternet.com

To: enquiries@mullofkintyrereview.org.uk

Hello Mr Passa

I am having difficulty emailing you and my email has been returned undelivered so I will try again as per below.

Peter

--- On Wed, 13/4/11, PETER EYRE wrote:

From: PETER EYRE
Subject: Re: Seperate email to the Mull of Kintyre Review Board and Cc others
To: enquiries@mullofkintyrereview.org.uk
Cc: beckettm@parliament.uk, scotlandp@parliament.uk, john.healey.mp@parliament.uk, info@davidcameron.com, info@derbyconservatives.co.uk, info@derbylabourparty.co.uk, info@libdems.org.uk, chris@chrishuhne.org.uk, fife_office@mingcampbell.org.uk, feedback@peterlilley.co.uk, ranjit.banwait@live.co.uk, williamss@parliament.uk, michael.carr@derby.gov.uk, tuplin17@tiscali.co.uk, Robert.troup@derby.gov.uk, margaret.hird@derby.gov.uk, lonny.wilsoncroft@derby.gov.uk, reportingafraud@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, peter.eyre7@btinternet.com, chris.williamson.mp@parliament.uk, info@crossreach.org.uk, readers@forbes.com, newseditor@independent.co.uk, home.news@thetimes.co.uk, rights@guardian.co.uk, national@guardian.co.uk, paul.hutcheon@sundayherald.com, webeditor@dailyrecord.co.uk, reporters@dailyrecord.co.uk, ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com, bigdee@blueyonder.co.uk, romac100@hotmail.com, dickhadlow@hotmail.com
Date: Wednesday, 13 April, 2011, 9:18
Attention Mr Alex Passa

Please be kind enough to acknowledge receipt of this email at your earliest convenience.

Thanking you in anticipation

Peter Eyre

--- On Wed, 13/4/11, PETER EYRE wrote:

From: PETER EYRE
Subject: Seperate email to the Mull of Kintyre Review Board and Cc others
To: enquires@mullofkintyrereview.org.uk
Cc: beckettm@parliament.uk, scotlandp@parliament.uk, john.healey.mp@parliament.uk, info@davidcameron.com, info@derbyconservatives.co.uk, info@derbylabourparty.co.uk, info@libdems.org.uk, chris@chrishuhne.org.uk, fife_office@mingcampbell.org.uk, feedback@peterlilley.co.uk, ranjit.banwait@live.co.uk, williamss@parliament.uk, michael.carr@derby.gov.uk, tuplin17@tiscali.co.uk, Robert.troup@derby.gov.uk, margaret.hird@derby.gov.uk, lonny.wilsoncroft@derby.gov.uk, reportingafraud@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, peter.eyre7@btinternet.com, chris.williamson.mp@parliament.uk, info@crossreach.org.uk, readers@forbes.com, newseditor@independent.co.uk, home.news@thetimes.co.uk, rights@guardian.co.uk, national@guardian.co.uk, paul.hutcheon@sundayherald.com, webeditor@dailyrecord.co.uk, reporters@dailyrecord.co.uk, ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com, bigdee@blueyonder.co.uk, romac100@hotmail.com, dickhadlow@hotmail.com
Date: Wednesday, 13 April, 2011, 8:46
To
Mr Alex Passa
The Mull of Kintyre Review
1 Melville Crescent
Edinburgh
EH3 7HW Wednesday the 13th of April 2011


Dear Mr Passa

For the attention of the Mull of Kintyre Review Board:

The Rt Hon Lord Philip, Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP, the Rt Hon the Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and the Rt Hon the Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke.

To the Rt Hon members of the Mull of Kintyre Review Board

Please find attached a record/press release of my own findings regarding the loss of RAF Chinook ZD576, its crew and passenger on the 2nd of June 1994 on the headland of the Mull of Kintyre Scotland.

Whatever the outcome of your own investigations I would insist you arrange for Ms Tara Andrea Davison (Nee Tara Andrea Biggs-Davison) to be interviewed under oath and recorded at the earliest opportunity and that this action be made public in your report.

I would also ask you to be most critical of the RAF - MoD procedures in allowing all of these highly qualified terrorism experts to travel on the same aircraft, which is in gross violation of normal aviation protocol.

I would ask you also to be critical of Leslie Sharp, The Chief Constable of Strathclyde who made the following statement immediately after the crash:
“I make it clear that there is no reason whatsoever to suspect that we are dealing with anything other than a terrible tragic accident.”

Why would a person so senior make such a statement immediately after the crash and who gave him the authority to make this statement? The circumstances and analysis of such a crash remains the duty of the investigation team and certainly not the Chief Constable of Police who has absolutely no aviation experience whatsoever!

I would also ask that consideration be given to the fact that many fishing boats were around the location at the time (as per comments made by Mr. Holbrook). He stated that he had to manoeuvre his boat around many other fishing boats.....so how come only one offshore witness was interviewed. They were in a much better position to observe the approaching helicopter.

The terminology and style used by the investigation team when questioning Mr. Holbrook was bordering on manipulation of the weather conditions at the time. Having spent many many years in such an environment and such coastal weather patterns I believe the weather to be acceptable for such a flight.

Finally I am deeply concerned at the latest press release by the BBC which just so happened to coincide with this release and stated:

"Newly discovered Ministry of Defence documents have cast further doubt on the cause of the Chinook helicopter crash on the Mull of Kintyre in 1994.The papers, obtained by the BBC, suggest there were official concerns over the airworthiness of the RAF's fleet of Chinooks two years earlier. It is understood they were never shown to the officer in charge of signing off the aircraft's airworthiness."

There is nothing new about the contents of this press release regarding the status of the Chinook airworthiness two year hence. The track record in regard to the failures of the FADEC system were well known, even leading right up to this crash.

The concerns were very well know by many experienced aircrews and more importantly by the RAF, Authorities and that of Boscombe Down, the very establishment that test aircraft, especially with this type of Chinook (HC) which had a long history of many such serious problems immediately prior to the above crash.

One would hope that this coincidental release is not a ploy by the powers that be to distract away from the possibility of it being an inside job i.e. the interference of and aircraft/sabotage?

Having some connection to Intel myself it would be in the governments best interest to now accept a lesser charge of FADEC failure rather than be accused of an internally arranged sabotage. I believe the term used now days is that of a "False Flag Incident."

I am sure that without losing your integrity you will therefore insist that Ms Tara Andrea Davison be interviewed without further delay and the above points be addressed.

Please be kind enough to acknowledge receipt of this email at your earliest convenience.

Thanking you in anticipation

Your Sincerely

Peter Eyre

Aviation Consultant - Ex Senior Operations Officer (Airline and Helicopter) - Ex Search and Rescue Coordinator (Helicopters).
---------------------------

I eventually then received acknowledgement of receipt as follows:

RE: Re: Seperate email to the Mull of Kintyre Review Board and Cc others
Wednesday, 13 April, 2011 10:51

From: "Ada.Munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk"

To: peter.eyre7@btinternet.com
Dear Mr Eyre
I acknowledge receipt of your email but unfortunately there was no attachment.
Regards
Ada Munns
PA to Lord Philip
Mull of Kintyre Review
1 Melville Crescent
Edinburgh, EH3 7HW
T: 0131 244 9003
E: ada.munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk

Obviously I was having some considerable trouble with my computer (as I do many times when one is being hacked) and resent the entire email again, with the attachment, and received the following final acknowledgment:


RE: Re: Seperate email to the Mull of Kintyre Review Board and Cc others
Wednesday, 13 April, 2011 11:00

From: "Ada.Munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk"

To peter.eyre7@btinternet.com
Dear Peter

Thank you I have now received the attachment
Regards

Ada Munns
PA to Lord Philip
Mull of Kintyre Review
1 Melville Crescent
Edinburgh, EH3 7HW
T: 0131 244 9003

E: ada.munns@scotlandoffice.gsi.gov.uk

The whole purpose of boring you all with these communications is to make sure it is recorded in the public domain as to who received what and when……I call this being transparent.

I have already had some feedback that this is having a ripple effect within the powers that be…….and so it should!!

Footnote to this article:

You will note that this is referred too as a review rather than a fresh inquiry and in that context I am sure we can all determine the final outcome to some degree.
There was a perfectly good civil investigation team who really did start to open a can of worm, but even they had not focused on the possibility that this Chinook may have been tampered with or sabotaged and that I find of deep concern given the passengers involved and the fact they were all travelling together, However my aim is not to be critical of them but rather that of the RAF and the MoD in their duty of care towards their airman and these passengers.

Frequently the Ministers themselves are privy to such information and also the shortfalls and willing send their forces on special missions or combat knowing the possible resultant mishaps. Geoff Hoon is one such Minister who frequently covered his tracks, however in this particular case I believe the Secretary for Defence at the time was Malcolm Rifkind (now Sir Malcom Rifkind) under PM John Major.

His position at the moment in the current government is that of Chair of the The Intelligence and Security Committee under PM David Cameron (how very convenient). The President of the Board of Trade at the time of the crash was Michael Heseltine (now Lord Heleltine).

It goes without saying that these two astute gentlemen have much information hidden within the corridors of Westminster, that may never be revealed, but with Sir Michael at the helm of Intelligence and Security what chance do we have of having an open and transparent review?


Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 13/4/2011 www.eyreinternational.com

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Was the RAF Chinook Helicopter crash an accident or was it sabotage?

Was the RAF Chinook Helicopter crash an accident or was it sabotage?

I believe it was sabotaged!

What really happened that terrible day in June 1994?

Chinook ZD576

Having worked with helicopter for some considerable time both operationally and in Search and Rescue I found this particular accident very distressing, especially as is the case that the crew is found guilty until proven guilty, unfortunately they are not here to tell their side of this story.

On the 2nd of June 1994 an RAF Chinook helicopter took off from Belfast Aldergrove Airport bound for a high level conference at Fort George, Nr Inverness, Scotland. Onboard were four very experienced crew members and 25 top level terrorism experts. The helicopter flew out over the sea in a north north-easterly direction towards the Mull of Kintyre, Scotland and crashed into the headland at approximately 1800 local time, killing all onboard. The aircraft tail number was ZD576 and crewed by Flt Lt Tapper (captain), Fl Lt Cook (co-pilot) with MALM Forbes and Sgt Hardie (crewman).

Every since this accident there have been many years of speculation but absolutely no one ever looked at the possibility of this helicopter being sabotaged, which I find quite remarkable, considering the fact that 25 high level terrorism experts were all onboard the same aircraft, which is clearly a no no in both military and civil aviation.

The timeline reads as follows:

June 1994: Chinook Helicopter departed Belfast and crashed at the Mull of Kintyre en route to Fort George, Nr Inverness, Scotland
1995: An RAF board of inquiry finds nothing to clearly indicate what caused the crash.
Based on the limited evidence, it says the wrong rate of climb was a contributory factor, although technical malfunction cannot be positively disproved.
However, two Air Marshalls who review the evidence find Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper had been grossly negligent.
1996: A fatal accident inquiry leaves open the question of what caused the accident, but the sheriff recommends the immediate installation of cockpit voice and accident data recorders.
May 1998: The Commons Defence Committee reports that the helicopter involved in the crash was not suffering from "fundamental flaws", but makes no judgement on the immediate cause of the crash.
May 1999: Computer Weekly publishes evidence - not available to crash investigators - that the helicopter's FADEC engine control software was not reliable and may have been the cause of the crash. Flt Lt Tapper is said by the magazine to have expressed concerns about the speed at which the Chinook's "full authority digital engine control" was being put into service.
July 2000: Prime Minister Tony Blair promises to look personally at the circumstances of the crash, but stresses he will not reopen the inquiry.
November 2000: Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon, backed by Mr Blair, again rejects fresh calls for a new inquiry.
Weeks later the Commons' Public Accounts Committee presents a report disputing the original inquiry's findings. It says there were repeated problems with the aircraft and the pilots should be exonerated, but the government insists the report is "superficial" and says "nothing new". Angry campaigners call the response a cover-up.
April 2001: Peers vote in favour of a House of Lords all-party inquiry into the crash, after the government bows to pressure and allows the vote for a fresh investigation to go ahead. The move is welcomed by Mike Tapper, father of Flt Lt Tapper, who has been campaigning to clear his son's name.
June 2001: Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, a former Scottish appeal court judge, is named as chairman of a five-strong House of Lords committee to report on the crash early in 2002.
February 2002: The two RAF pilots are cleared of blame for the 1994 crash by Lord Jauncey's inquiry.


The wreckage of RAF Chinook ZD 576 in which 29 people died
Now that I have given you overview on this tragic accident I will now discuss the contents of a conversation I had with an ex Intel Officer who worked for the Department of Trade and Industry.

Her name is Tara Andrea Davison although we believe her full birth name to be Tara Andrea Biggs-Davison daughter of Sir John Alec Biggs-Davison, Conservative MP now deceased. She was at some stage married to Peter Lilley’s Brother but now divorced. She also paid some visits to Iraq carrying out other activities.

Ms Davison worked with the DTI for many years and also had access to No10 from time to time. She carried out research on illegal arms dealing. Tara apparently left the DTI with many files appertaining to illegal arms dealings etc which she hoped to present at the Iraq inquiry but her house was raided by the Derbyshire Police who took all her very sensitive documents and also many documents relating to the many fraudulent companies that were controlled by her. She was placed on bail which has since been extended and is due in Mid May this year 2011.

In Tara own words she was called upon to provide evidence of a sensitive nature regarding arms to Iraq to Sir John Chilcot for the Iraq Inquiry. A large team of police from Derbyshire raided her premises in North Wales in Mid January 2010. They seized all of her ex DTI papers and also all her business papers etc.

It just so happens that I was at the time also doing much media work regarding illegal arms dealings, conflicts/wars, the use of depleted uranium and helping Gordon Bowden to expose his findings on massive fraud in this country and overseas.
Gordon and I decided via M that we would make contact with her in the hope we could take sides with her and help in her case, whilst at the same time gain much information that was also to our advantage…….our approach was based on the fact that she was a very small fish as far as fraud goes but with her help we could possibly get the bigger boys.

Back to the story: On the 4th of August 2010 I made contact with her regarding a possible visitation and we exchanged a few thoughts on Intel etc and it was during this conversation that she gave reference to the Chinook accident in the Mull of Kintyre.

Tara told me that it was all done from her office. I asked her why would they do this and she went on to say that things were not going according to plan, as the government expected and that there were a few problems, when such things happen you remove the problem or the people.

The phone call lasted for some considerable time and on completion I telephoned Gordon Bowden and explained to him what Tara had said to me, he obviously was as shocked as I.

I reflected on this and over the next two months embarked on my own investigations having worked with helicopters for some considerable time. It was during this interim period I noticed that one of the original civil investigators was Captain Ralph Kohn, a pilot I once knew some years previously and took steps to make contact with him.

I initially made contact with Captain Kohn by phone and then by email as I always prefer to have such events recorded in writing; accordingly after receiving some contacts from Ralph I sent the following email:

From: PETER EYRE
Subject: Re: MOK Chinook crash
To: ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com
Date: Thursday, 7 October, 2010, 10:37
Hello everyone

I have just had a very long chat with Ralph regarding ZD576 accident etc

My background is airline operations, weather, search and rescue etc and have worked with two of the largest private sector companies i.e. BMA which is now BMI and also Bristow Helicopter etc....I was also in the Military working on Aircraft Carrier and many staff jobs including NATO HQ which covered a certain amount of Intel work etc

I happened to be talking to an ex civilian Intel operative about many topics and the Chinook crash came up in conversation and what I was told blows the whole current investigation right out of the window and therefore it is in your best interest to pursue this aspect.

For my part I investigate many strange events i.e. 9/11 etc etc as well as many other non aviation topics.......I write articles about many things, do TV and Radio from time to time and basically my theory is....investigate things yourself and once you are convinced of some wrong doings, conspiracy aspects or a total cover up then write about it and reveal the truth......this I have done many many times but because of the nature of the Chinook incident I had to give this some careful thought.

I have carried out my evaluation and noticed that in general the entire report from the military perspective was one big cover up.......there was so many conflicting reports about the weather, transponder code, in flight communications, electro magnetic field interference, witness reports etc that made the RAF report almost a mockery compared to the civil report as compiled and edited by Ralph.

Areas that should have been covered were not covered and more should have been done with the onshore witnesses etc which again did not add up........I have been involved in flight planning, weather briefs with special experience in helicopter operations and the associated ATC etc.

A new enquiry must be totally independent if there is such a world and it has to be monitored by the likes of yourself, and I in particular would also like to participate in making sure that this inquiry is operating outside of the influence of the RAF and Military......which I think may be fairly impossible.

The information I discussed with Ralph this morning is one aspect that has received no consideration whatsoever....why not I really don't know......the other major aspect that I am very concerned about is that of aviation security and procedures and the fact that all this high profile guys all travelled on one aircraft is beyond common sense and for my part became part my input as this being and inside job.......I think the modern day term is "False Flag.

As you must appreciate the work I normally carry out is highly dangerous and thus entails constant monitoring at all levels of communications....including this one and therefore if you bring me onboard you also will become part of that web....if you see what I mean

This whole incident sounds so suspect it is beyond words and yet no one has looked at this....why?

So here I am and the next step is up to you all

Peter
--------------------

End of communication
Unfortunately there had been little communication back, despite the fact that I had offered a totally different viewpoint as to the possible cause of this crash. However, I continued to communicate with those involved and at the same time spoke with my friend Gordon Bowden again, after completing my own investigation. Gordon was very firm with me when he said it is my duty of care to report this fact to the police and if I didn’t he would. We then both decided to visit the Police HQ in Derby and make a statement, which we hoped would be under oath and fully recorded. This then prompted me to send another email to the group who dealt with the previous investigation as follows:

From "PETER EYRE"

To ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com, bigdee@blueyonder.co.uk, romac100@hotmail.com, dickhadlow@hotmail.com

Hello again

I have been speaking with my friend who was the person I discussed my telephone conversion with concerning the call I had previously made to an ex Intel Operative some time ago.

My friend who is also ex RAF asked me what information I had found out about the crash and the circumstances, to which I replied, that there were so many grey areas that certainly did not make sense.

I went through everything with him (he knows that I will not make a statement until I myself am satisfied that something is deeply suspect)......he then reflected on my conversation with the Intel Operative and said that I am obliged to report this to the police.

Since my chat with him last night and more investigations I again rang him to be a witness to what I have been doing both in the past and up to the current time and likewise I do the same for him........because the issues we both deal in are highly sensitive we have to do this for our own protection.

I have just been in touch with him at 1210 today and we will both go to the Police Station today to lodge a statement regarding my chat with this Intel Operative that, if true, implicates the authorities to this being an inside job. Either way we already know that the only reason this Chinook could have crashed was by some catastrophic event taking place at Waypoint A rendering the crew unable to correct what was happening to them.

So my conclusion is one of two events took place

1. The aircraft systems failed catastrophically and the crew were unable to override the problem manually resulting in the crash. Or

2. If my conversation with the Intel operative is correct then the aircraft was tampered with controlled by and arranged by a Government Agency who deliberately wanted the passengers onboard this Chinook removed. It was explained that some of those deceased may not have been moving the peace talks along the way the Government wanted and so such things can happen. The operative actually told me that the Chinook Incident was done from the operative’s office.

This caused me deep concern, knowing that the deceased crew and their families had gone through hell in trying to clear them of neglect etc.

The phone call in question occurred on Wednesday the 4th of August 2010 and spread over a period of late morning to early afternoon. Soon after this I contacted the informant and thanked for the chat etc.

It has taken me some time to not only come to terms with this conversation but also the facts that this is high risk for me and those involved. I already am dealing in some very sensitive areas and this just adds more fuel to the existing fire and the associated risks.

For my part I also had to go through the whole incident in my own mind to see if I could convince myself that the accident to Chinook ZD576 was certainly not crew error.

As an ex aviation professional in Airline Operations, Flight Planning, Search and Rescue and also having worked for Bristow Helicopters in an ATC/SAR role I am now convinced that either of the above two were responsible for this accident.

I will get back to you all after I have been to the local police and I will have my friend with me as a witness to the event.

Would you all please acknowledge receipt of this email just in case something should happen to me or my friend

Best Regards

Peter Eyre
----------------------
End of communications

I did ask Captain Kohn to acknowledge receipt of my email and he did so as per below:

From: Ralph Kohn
Subject: RE: Chinook ZD576
To: "'PETER EYRE'"
Date: Thursday, 7 October, 2010, 14:23
Peter
I acknowledge your intention of reporting the matter you told me about as explained hereunder, to the Police.
Ralph
----------------------------

Gordon and I then went to the Derby Police HQ the events of which are recorded below:

Re Chinook ZD576
Thursday 7th October 2010 19:53
From Peter Eyre
To ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com, bigdee@blueyonder.co.uk, romac100@hotmail.com, dickhadlow@hotmail.com
Hello Gentlemen

Myself and my friend Gordon Bowden (Ex RAF) went to Derby Police HQ, St Mary's Wharf, Derby today to give information in relation to my email to you concerning the information I received over the phone ref the Chinook being an inside job.

The police first interviews Gordon Bowden who gave them an overall picture as to what he and I are doing on a broad range of issues.

Gordon then told them about the telephone conversation I had with an Ex Government Intel Operative and what that person said to me regarding the above accident. I then rang Gordon Bowden and discussed the conversation with him......this was some time ago.

The interview was recorded under incident number 620 of the 07/10/2010 and commenced at 1633 - 1747. The interviewing officers were DC Cyples Shoulder Number 1772 and DC Rigby Shoulder Number 1134.

When my turn came they did not have time to interview me and said they would arrange for a recorded interview to take place another day and would be in touch.

The general mannerism of the Police was rather blank and they said that they could not see us for a recorded interview unless the matter was of high importance......we both explained the risk to ourselves in raising this issue and so we want this visit recorded....that was done initially with Gordon and so the matter is now officially recorded.

I will let you know the next stage when I get my interview....they didn’t appear too interested in the topic and both came away slightly deflated.....so we will see

Kind Regards Peter Eyre End of communications
---------------------------------

In my frustration of trying to gain attention from anyone related to this inquiry I decided to send an email to key members of the Royal Aeronautical Society as per the email below:

Chinook ZD576
From Peter Eyre Saturday 9th October, 2010 12:25
To petercbr@bigpond.net.au, ljbrown@raaf.defence.gov.au, frostywilliams@optusnet.com.au, canberrabranch@raes.org.au, melbournebranch@raes.org.au, perthbranch@raes.org.au, sydneybranch@raes.org.au, beford@raes.org.uk, malcolm.cloke@uk.thalesgroup.com, graham@wiley61.fsnet.co.uk, bcsomerset@qinetiq.com, jeremy.norwood@atkinsglobal.com, ben.groves@baesystems.com, bill.armit@eurocontrol.int, david.whitehead@marshallaerospace.com, raescardiff@hotmail.com, keith.housley@brabners.com, mel.porter@flight-refuelling.com, ronald.carr@btopenworld.com, c.p.lawson@cranfield.ac.uk, dmarshall@coningsby.ac.uk, ch.pericleous@cytanet.com.cy, keith.cobley@rolls-royce.com, donallowry@hotmail.com, 815aeo@yeovilton.mod.uk, pigramik@bp.com, dbates3192@aol.com, roy.mccarthy@talk21.com, maxi.rothe@airbus.com, jamesaeroltd@yahoo.co.uk, adrian.gj.constable@britishairways.com, AlexWmGRAY@aol.com, steve_chadwick@cathaypacific.com, chris@iominvest.com, hamarc@enablingtechnologies.co.uk, colin.moss@baesystems.com, mkhirharun@miat.com.my, p.bradbury@salford.ac.uk, raesmarham@aol.com, robin.heaps@baesystems.com, afainberg@afci.ca, secretary@raes-munich.de, john.barrack@nzdf.mil.nz, gerard.robertson@airnz.co.nz, damian.scott@safeair.co.nz, petercoker@cokerconsultancy.co.nz, wfjones@xtra.co.nz, barry.heir@xtra.co.nz, bernardwe@paradise.net.nz, jon.viner@bmaa.org, hafeez@pafkiet.edu.pk, f.roudier@Salon-du-Bourget.fr, chcott@globalnet.co.uk, quentin.wilson@btopenworld.com, raes-sbsecretary@comcast.net, chee-kin.lin@ezsolutions.com.sg, claw@mech.wits.ac.za, secretary@solent-raes.org.uk, sean.corr@lothburyuk.com, andrew.o.jones@mbda.co.uk, secretary@swindonraes.co.uk, bernard.mattos@airbus.com, emilia.papadopoulos@emirates.com, Hickling3903@aol.com, kenmodavies@aol.com, tongff@taeco.com, hammj@whl.co.uk, tombsf@parliement.uk.

Cc
ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk, flipseal@hotmail.com, bigdee@blueyonder.co.uk, romac100@hotmail.com, dickhadlow@hotmail.com, rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk, peter.eyre7@btinternet.com, contact@daviddavisforfreedom.com, conservative@haltemprice.karoo.co.uk


Ref Chinook ZD576 Crash Mull of Kintyre Scotland 2nd June 1994

New Inquiry to take place

Good Afternoon Everyone

I would like to bring to your attention the original conclusion handed down by Senior RAF Staff who found that the pilots caused the accident by flying into high ground through gross negligence.

As you may or may not know there were many grey areas leading up to this accident as well as conflicting conclusions between the civilian investigation team and the military investigation team.

For my part I am ex Senior Operations Staff having served with a large airline and also a very large helicopter company. My duties have covered all aspects of aviation with a focus on Operations, Flight Planning, Weather, Search and Rescue, Scheduling, Crewing, Maintenance Scheduling and aviation security. My position also allowed me to travel frequently on the flight deck jump seat checking flight plans en route. This function was also performed with helicopters having flown as S/N crew on both the flight deck and as loadmaster for freight runs, sling loads and search and rescue etc.

In addition to this I am also highly qualified in the Marine Industry having been a Senior Port Controller with a Master Certificate, carrying out functions that cover safe navigation of port and coastal approaches, radar, weather/cyclone advisory service. Search and Rescue etc.

This basically gave me much experience at flying in a coastal environment as well as the experience of coastal transit on the marine side in both the Royal Navy and in civil marine.

Before going into the reasons for sending this email I wish to point out my own concerns relating to this particular accident:

• This particular type of Chinook (HC2) had a long history of problems which were known to the authorities and in particular Boscombe Down immediately prior to the accident. The very aircraft itself had also encountered serious problems prior to the day of the accident.

• It is a common understanding that ZD576 was not a serviceable aircraft in the true sense and had this been a civilian Chinook it would never have been allowed to depart. In civil aviation we have in our operational manual what we call allowable deficiencies. This basically is a list of go or no go items.

• The weather was typical coastal type weather with some hills shrouded in cloud or mist and it was obvious from the account of the Mr. Holbrook (the boat skipper) that visibility at sea level was reasonable. From my experience the cloud/mist on the coastal hills is continuously swirling around with a fluctuating cloud base. The fact that the lighthouse keeper did not have good visibility is because he was at a higher level and in a totally different position. Mr. Holbrook could see the surrounds of the lighthouse and the approaching helicopter.

• As an expert in aviation security it is not normal for such people as Royal Family, VIP, and CEO/Directors to travel on the same aircraft in number for obvious reasons. Why was such a high profile group allowed to travel on one helicopter?

• The Chinook departed Aldergrove as a VFR flight and did transit the northeast part of Northern Ireland before its sea transit to the Mull of Kintyre without incident.

• The crew would have selected on their SatNav (whilst still at Aldergrove) their first waypoint which was A and also programmed in their second waypoint B etc.

• As the crew visually monitored the approaching Mull of Kintyre headland they would have been extremely alert and ready to call ATC with a position report i.e. waypoint A and at the same time selected waypoint B.

• A call to ATC was made but no response was given and one has to ask why not as this was a very special flight and the RAF would have been carrying out flight following procedures. One would also assume this was a position report and at that time would have selected waypoint B having also gone visual with the lighthouse.

• One can therefore only assume at this moment something catastrophic occurred that took away the ability of the crew to control the helicopter. This can only lead to five possible causes - Catastrophic Failure of the control mechanism - Contamination of the Hydraulic System - FADEC failure - Interference to the aircraft by either outside or inside persons - Crew Error.

• It is also common knowledge that the Mull of Kintyre is in itself a very secretive location used as a testing ground for advanced (next generation) high tech military aircraft as well as US Navy Seals. One would therefore assume that the area was monitored continuously by both the RAF and the US with their usual array of sophisticated tracking systems and radar etc.

• There would have been other fishing boats around and one could ask the question how much effort was put into obtaining witnesses, how was the screening carried out and were all witnesses taken to their location on that day to display and explain what they saw or heard etc.

• Why wasn’t the possibility of sabotage or external control of the aircraft looked at more deeply? This has been discussed many times at other aircraft accidents but did not play a significant part in this inquiry. This can be in the form of what they call an outside job or an inside job. The status of the passengers would have certainly made this a possibility.

There are so many other grey areas to discuss but the above would be my initial concerns.

I would now like to reveal to you the contents of an email and message that I have distributed to the civilian investigators and to many other outlets. The matter has now been reported to the police after my own exhaustive investigation into this accident and the fact that what I heard during a telephone conversation was of concern to me.

This conversation was discussed at length with my friend, Gordon Bowden, with whom I have been doing much research and investigation on many topics. We both came to the same conclusion that being ex military and responsible citizens it is our duty of care to report this incident.

I have attempted to keep this at a civilian level and away from the government/political sectors until such time as those in the aviation business are fully aware of my thoughts and what I witnessed. I have obviously selected key members of the Royal Aeronautical Society for their knowledge and their integrity and also copied it to the investigation team.

You will find in the text the incident number from the police as evidence of our visitation. We both await formal recorded interviews, which hopefully will be sooner than later.

The purpose of this email is to influence the investigation teams and others into looking at the accident from a different perspective. Vital question remains unanswered and that is was this aircraft tampered with or controlled by inside/outside operatives, was it a catastrophic failure resulting in the crew inability to control the aircraft or was it simply pilots error (which appears to be most doubtful) based on the collective experience of the crew.

The operative who gave me the information is vital to this inquiry and must be cross examined in a court of law and in doing so will contribute significantly to the new inquiry.

Please find attached a summary of events that I compiled on the 7/10/2010

Finally I would just like our thoughts to focus of those that perished, namely:

Crew of Chinook ZD576:




PILOT: F/LT JONATHAN P.TAPPER.
PILOT: F/LT RICHARD D.COOK.
LOADMASTER: M/SGT GRAHAM W.FORBES.
LOADMASTER: SGT KEVIN A.HARDIE.


Passengers:

Asst Chief Constable: BRIAN FITZSIMONS.
Det Chief Superintendant: DESMOND CONROY.
Det Chief Superintendant: MAURICE NEILLY.
Det Superintendant: PHILLIP DAVIDSON.
Det Superintendant: ROBERT FOSTER.
Det Superintendant: BILLY GWILLIAM.
Det Superintendant: IAN PHOENIX .
Det Chief Inspector: DENIS BUNTING.
Det Inspector: STEPHEN DAVIDSON.
Det Inspector: KEVIN MAGEE.
Home Office CB-57: JOHN DEVERILL.
COLONEL: CHRISTOPHER BILES. OBE.
LT COLONEL: RICHARD GREGORY-SMITH.
LT COLONEL: JOHN TOBIAS.
LT COLONEL: GEORGE WILLIAMS.
MAJOR: CHRISTOPHER J.DOCHERTY.
MAJOR: ANTHONY HORNBY.
MAJOR: GARY SPARKS.
MAJOR: RICHARD ALLEN.
MAJOR: ROY PUGH.
ANNE JAMES.
MARTIN DALTON.
JOHN HAYNES.
MICHAEL MALTBY.
STEPHEN RICKARD.

I look forward to any feedback or response from those addressed above.

Kind Regards

Peter Eyre - Aviation Consultant-Senior Airline/Helicopter Operations-SAR Coordinator

Sent 1225 9/10/2010
----------------------------



This collective email did not go down too well when I received the following response:
From: Simon Luxmoore
Subject: Email regarding Chinook
To: peter.eyre7@btinternet.com
Date: Tuesday, 12 October, 2010, 15:20
Dear Mr Eyre,
As Chief Executive of the Royal Aerospace Society I have it brought to my attention by a number of members that you have been circulating and email concerning ‘Chinook’ to what appears to be a wide distribution within the Society.
This has raised a significant amount of concern within the Society in general.
In order to understand just exactly who you are and where you are coming from, I would be grateful if you would contact me with some contact points and an explanation of the situation.
Sincerely,
Simon Luxmoore
----------------------------
My response to Mr Luxmore was as follows:
From: PETER EYRE
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:36:59 +0100 (BST)
To: Simon Luxmoore
Subject: Re: Email regarding Chinook
Dear Mr Luxmoore

Thank you very much for your quick response in reply to my rather long and complicated brief to your members and also to the civil investigation team.

Myself and my friend have been under much pressure in attempting to bring the contents of this email out into the public domain.

It has become clear that there is a distinct lack of motivation in attempting to get those that were involved in the initial investigation of the Chinook ZD576 to accept that the information that was passed to me during a private conversation could be factual.

I have no reason to believe that the informant, who previously held a position as a government intelligence officer, was not telling the truth. However I do appreciate the sensitivity of the information provided, and if true, the implications.

What I do find disturbing is that this aspect was not taken into account or if it was it was quickly brushed under the carpet by the military/government bodies.

As you know there is much, dare I say, total disagreement between the civil investigators and the military brass with many aspects of this investigation, result in a new investigation taking place.

I have a long history in both military and civil aviation (at senior operational level) and therefore consider myself to be of sound body and mind. It would certainly not be acceptable, as someone as already indicated that I dwell on the conspiracy theory.

I have had some connection with Intel myself in the past and also been involved in my normal airline duties in providing information to the AIB over some accidents that have happened during my tour of duty. I have also discussed my own theory in relation to multi sectors, crew hours, commercial brainwashing of pilots and some aspects of when two captains fly together etc etc. All in all a wealth of practical experience as well as flying in the jump seat many times checking flight plans and all associated en route problems etc.

This experience has covered long haul, short haul, VIP/Executive Jet and in particular helicopter operations and ATC/SAR etc.

With that out the way I will try to reduce what I have to say in bullet points as per below along with the action both myself and friend have taken to date. The reaction by the police was disgraceful to say the least and still we are both waiting to log this situation in a recorded interview, under oath etc. The basics have been revealed and given an incident number, which is given in the text below.

My purpose for communicating with your members was for the very reason, that up to the current time, we are drawing blanks. I beleive that with the integrity and respect carried by the RAS you would be in a position to look into this matter to ensure, that what I have disclosed, is received and acted upon. More importantly the fact that this angle should now form part of the new investigation.

I believe the aircraft wreckage is still under lock and key and can therefore be re examined.

See below for summary and bullet points etc

I look forward to your response.

Peter Eyre
------------------------
Mr Luxmoore responded in a rather arrogant way :
From: dirscl@mobileemail.vodafone.net
Subject: Re: Email regarding Chinook
To: "PETER EYRE"
Date: Wednesday, 13 October, 2010, 7:02
Mr Eyre
Can you tell me who you are and what authority you believe you have to communicate with the Society's members on this or any other issue. This clearly has become vexatious both to the Society and its membership.
Simon Luxmoore
---------------------------
I once again emailed him again with the following:
Dear Mr Luxmoore

I appreciate your concern but you have to understand that if one finds oneself up against a wall, in wanting to report a matter that could influence the way in which an aviation accident is investigated, then one can only turn to those organisation or individuals who have respect in the industry.

I thus emailed the investigation team; those listed in the RAS and selected political figures as well as other third parties in order to generate a response.

Obviously I will continue to email many other people in the industry until such time as this matter is acknowledged and that collectively some pressure is applied to interview the person who made the initial statement.

The very fact that very senior and well respected civil aviators disagreed with the military panel is of great concern and as one would expect the crew were originally charged with gross neglect, which has since been waived.

The RAS prides itself in the contribution is makes to aeronautics as well as safety issue and standards etc. The recent event organised by the RAS in London - Human Factors, Emergency Response and Safety Management is typical of that contribution.

As part of my determination to make sure as many aviation/aeronautical/aerospace experts were informed, I selected organisations that were available via the public domain.

The civil and military aviation sectors are openly discussing events leading up to the crash and because of that concern, and the pressure from outside sources, the government has been forced to re investigate the crash of Chinook ZD576 (2 July 1994).

This is the last and final opportunity for the crew to be totally cleared and for the true reason as to what caused this crash to be revealed. No stone must remained unturned, which I am sure you agree.

This particular model of Chinook and the FADEC system had been causing major problems for the crews flying it and the Test Pilots at Boscombe Down had grounded this type just before the crash.

It is the duty of care for anyone associated with aviation, aeronautics or aerospace to report anything that could have contributed to this crash. That is exactly what I and my associate have done in reporting the matter to the police. However in doing so we have been received in a very unprofessional way.

You will see at the end of my previous email that I have already revealed exactly who I am and indicated to you my long standing experience in aviation.

The seriousness of this accident and the lack of receiving a professional response leave one with no choice but to email all those whom you respect in the industry and that is exactly what I have done.

The fact that 29 highly professional experts perished that day does not restrict one from communicating with anyone whom you can contact in the public domain and that is exactly what I have done.

Yours Sincerely

Peter Eyre - 2130 LT - 13/10/2010
-------------------------------

Well as you would expect the arrogance continued in his further response:


From: dirscl@mobileemail.vodafone.net
Subject: Re: Email regarding Chinook
To: "PETER EYRE"
Date: Wednesday, 13 October, 2010, 22:23
Mr Eyre,
In the light of your latest correspondence and arising from a number of concerned requests that I have received from our members, I must formerly request that you cease contacting our membership further, using contact details obtained from RAeS originated sources.
Simon Luxmoore
Chief Executive

Cc John Balfour Hon Solicitor
David Couzens President
---------------------

When your dealing with such an important issue and with such a respected organisation you would expect a more favorable response. However, I was not put off by this self opinionated upstart and sent him this final email:

From Peter Eyre
To dirscl@mobileemail.vodafone.net

Mr Luxmoore


I can assure you that I have no further requirement to contact the RAS.

As advised I am contacting many other organisations on the issues raised as I feel it is my duty of care to do so in order to maintain the highest level of safety and standards.

Having spent most of my life associated with aviation safety and security I can assure you that this matter will continue to be raised until a satisfactory response has been achieved.

During my time in both military and civilian aviation I had the unfortunate task of being part of both lifeboat and helicopter SAR.....later I became a coordinator and had my own ATC/SAR centre. I became sickened (having recovered many victims) by the fact that in most cases the crew were or are "guilty until proven guilty" despite the many shortfalls on aviation safety and maintenance.

Maybe had you been through the same experience you also would possibly have taken a stance, just like me. However, it is easy to turn a blind eye and turn to the beaucracy and red tape by asking me "Can you tell me who you are and what authority you believe you have to communicate with the Society's members on this or any other issue..

I am sure the relatives of the deceased would be deeply upset by the general response from the many sectors that I have exhausted.

All communications have been recorded as evidence that I have attempted to bring this to the attention of as many people as is possible.

Peter Eyre
-------------------------

I found Mr. Luxmoore’s comment rather ironic when one reads the following headlines:

“Royal Aeronautical Society fellows doubt safety of Chinook software”

I then received communications from Captain Ralph Kohn who obviously on reflection expressed an interest in my activities and sent the following message:
From: Ralph Kohn
Subject: RE: Chinook ZD576
To: "'PETER EYRE'"
Date: Thursday, 21 October, 2010, 0:10
Hi Peter,
Have you had any follow-up from the Police? How about the friend you went with to speak to them?

I saw you sent mail to many contacts in Australia . Are they people you worked with out there on the Chinook affair? I have written to Lord Philip and I hope he will hear what I say. It is much in his hands now to try to liberate the MAA and MAAIB from the MoD and make them really independent.

For your information and record, I attach my words to him on the subject, as reflected in a letter I wrote to the RAeS, in response to an article written by a professor Hayward . My letter is self explanatory.

I also wrote to him about Chinook Mark 2 Airworthiness failings and sent him a copy of a letter I had written to MoD in December 2009, which was never answered until I sent it to the new minister Dr Liam Fox, who responded. I just wanted to make sure Lord Philip saw it and read my covering memo to him, in which I re-emphasise the Airworthiness failings point, on behalf of the writers of the Macdonald report (April 2000). Did you see it on the site I mentioned? The letter I refer to was in Addendum 4 (2010). The report is quite old now and a lot more has surfaced since, hence addendum 4.

I hope your campaign succeeds, as coming from another angle. Ralph

From: PETER EYRE [mailto:peter.eyre7@btinternet.com]
Sent: 21 October 2010 07:47
To: Ralph Kohn
Subject: RE: Chinook ZD576
Hello Ralph
First of all I would like to say how happy I was to have received an email from you as I have been banging my head against a brick wall since my last communications with you.

At first I thought your initial response, after listening to my side of the story on the phone, was bordering on ridicule when you indicated that you can only act on fact and not conspiracy theory. "We will continue to follow the path we are treading, but without introducing conspiracy theories that cannot be proved for the moment. We deal in facts, so assumptions cannot be introduced without weakening our case at it now stands." As I have indicated to you already when a person provides information of this nature to me (That this was an inside job arranged via their department) and that person is not only an Intelligence Investigator but also acts as an advisor at the highest level, one has to take note. It is very easy to put this to bed very quickly by someone interviewing the person concerned. It this was done rather sooner than later then it would certainly give the investigators a new angle to investigate and possibly substantiate.

I am also somewhat shocked that more attention was not paid to the possibility of sabotage anyway based on the status of the passengers being carried. The very fact that all these very high Military, Intel, Security and Anti Terrorism guys were all flying on one aircraft is beyond belief.

I myself am ex security and this would not normally ever be allowed.... so again why didn't someone look at this angle and why was severe criticism not made of this flawed mistake......that in itself would add fire to the sabotage theory. It was obvious around this time that peace talks between all those concerned was not moving along at the pace our government had hoped for. The Northern Ireland situation was become a thorn in the side with much pressure also coming from the US .
Having been connected with some level of Intel over many years I fully understand that if their is a major obstacle that is slowing down progress....then remove the obstacle........I think enough said at this stage.

So that would be my first approach before even starting the new inquiry.
Secondly I agree with you that maintenance has always been an issue in all aspects of aviation both in the military and civilian sense. So in the event that my first theory is discounted, I totally agree that this has to be some other catastrophic failure that caused ZD576 to continue on track ahead of waypoint A.

I have read much information about this accident, especially the large file on Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI) or Radio Frequency Interference (RMI) and to some extend I found this a diversion from the main theme as to why the Chinook flew into the hillside.

Taking all things into account at the end of the day the Chinook had carried out a successful transition from Aldergrove, across the NE corner of Northern Ireland , followed by a sea transit up to Waypoint A. The very fact that all three on the flight deck were very experiences and also the fact that despite a general cloud base the aircraft was flying full VFR. They would have sighted the headland in good time and observed the cloud/mist shrouded hilltop.

The crew would have been extremely alert on the approach to the headland and would not have put the aircraft into danger, especially in the way indicated that she flew into the cloud/mist shrouded hilltop and that in their opinion the aircraft was climbing at a rate unable to clear the terrain.

AS you know yourself, having flowing to many coastal locations ,the weather is rather unique....the Channel Islands is a perfect example with an undulating cloud base from time to time and as the Chinook crew approach the turning point could have and would have made the turn to remain coastal of the western seaboard of the Mull of Kintyre.

Obviously at this critical moment they were not able to manually override the programmed waypoint (which when flying VFR they should have been able to do) having already gone visual with the headland.

One can therefore only conclude
1. That the crew did not have the ability to do a course correction at critical point A
2. That the aircraft was no longer under their control
3. That the FADEC caused major problems as it approached the headland and the height and workload of the crew did not allow them to take corrective measures
Another aspect (as an outsider) was the cross examination of the witnesses and were there more witnesses offshore besides the one vital witness. The report states that there were many fishing boats around at the time, which one would expect at such a coastal location.

So Ralph that’s it basically. My friend and I did go to the Police and their attitude was rather disgraceful but believe me we will go back to them again and force this issue.

In my frustration I have written to many people and as you said the people from the RAS......I specifically made an attempt to reach those in Australia as I am of dual nationality and know of Australians great track record on safety, having worked there.

I was shocked by the attitude of the CEO of the RAS and advised him that I would put his response on record....arrogance does not wear well with me on safety issues such as this!

I would love to be part of the new team just to take part from the ground operational point of view, having been a very good researcher and investigator on other matter. I have a very long experience in all aspects of aviation, especially with helicopter operations having done ATC and COMSAR for a very large project in Australia.

I have also worked with the Police as a controller in the HQ and certainly know how to interview witnesses to get the satisfactory result......there is no question that the witness investigation could have been rigged to give just one point of view that would favour the MOD/RAF and at the same time released them of any failings.
Thank you again for responding. You have certainly given me hope in your response that maybe you yourself now have other thoughts.

Kind Regards
Peter Eyre Ex Senior Operations Staff (Airline/Helicopter Ops) & SAR Coordinator
-------------------------
Ralph then passed me contact details for the new board of inquiry:
From: Ralph Kohn
Subject: RE: Chinook ZD576
To: "'PETER EYRE'"
Date: Friday, 22 October, 2010, 14:34
Dear Peter,
I remain interested in the follow-up from the part of those you have contacted to alert them of your fears.
I still do not think that at this point in time, that your voice and ideas can be added to ours, which remain of manufacturing engineering standards nature, but let me offer to you the point of contact for you to use as an independent contributor. The Terms of reference for Lord Philip’s review may be found at the following internet address and you can write to Mr Alex Passa at the address given at the end of the statement hereunder, to pass any comments you may wish to offer.
I continue to wish you well,
Do keep me in the picture if things develop at your end

With kind regards Ralph


http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100916/wmstext/100916m0001.htm

Mull of Kintyre Accident (Independent Review)
The Secretary of State for Defence (Dr Liam Fox): On 26 May this year, during the debate on the Queen's Speech, I confirmed that we would be honouring the pledge we made in opposition to hold an independent review of the evidence relating to the tragic accident on 2 June 1994 when a Chinook helicopter crashed at the Mull of Kintyre, killing all 29 people on board.

I am pleased to announce that the right hon. Lord Philip has agreed to conduct the review. Lord Philip, who retired in 2007 as a Lord of Session and Member of the Inner House and is a Privy Counsellor, brings a wealth of judicial experience to the task. He will be assisted in his work by a panel of three Privy Counsellors, all distinguished Parliamentarians: the Rt Hon Malcolm Bruce MP, the Rt Hon the Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and the Rt Hon the Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke.

The terms of reference of the review will be:

To examine all available evidence relating to the findings of the board of inquiry into the fatal accident at the Mull of Kintyre on 2 June 1994; and to report conclusions to the Secretary of State for Defence as soon as possible.
The review will be primarily an examination of the written record of the board of inquiry and of any other related evidence which it considers may throw light on the findings of the board. Lord Philip will, however, be happy to receive representations from individuals and groups with knowledge of the issues involved. Any person wishing to make contact with the review should

16 Sep 2010 : Column 54WS
write in the first instance to its Secretary, Mr Alex Passa, at The Mull of Kintyre Review, 1 Melville Crescent . Edinburgh EH3 7HW
--------------------------------

I then had a conversation with DC Ahmed at Derby Police HQ who advised me that he had now handed over this case regarding the Chinook to the MoD. I then sent this email to Gordon Bowden for his records:
From Peter Eyre 2nd November 2010
To Gordon Bowden


Gordon

DC Ahmed rang me at 1430 - 1450.

He told me that the two DC's had spoken to me re the Chinook...I said not this was not the case that I had given a brief summary to them and that they said they would try and find out who could deal with me and Gordon and get back to me by the following Monday and this didn't happen.

I explain that senior police officers died in this crash and therefore the police should be concerned and also that anything to do with an air crash is a police matter and they are responsible for securing the scene etc.....if information of this nature is revealed then it certainly is a police matter ie sabotage or interference with an aircraft etc.

I futher explained my concern that I have now provided information to the new investigation board and still the Police have not interviewed me etc,

He explained that he took over the case for DC Cyples and DC Rigby on the 12/10/2010 and he has sat down with the above two DC's and also carried out many inquires on the matter as he needed to know who could deal with this.......he told me that he has now passed the information over to the MOD and is still waiting for any feedback and cannot do anymore for the time being......he said that if an interview did take place it would not be local but somewhere more applicable.

I requested that he notifies those concerned that the letter to the Civil Inquiry people has been delivered as we speak and that it is of concern to me that I still have not been interviewed....he said I was interviewed....I told him this was not an interview it was a brief overview of the contents of the call and that most of the interview was all about Gordon’s Fraud information which was totally irrelevant with the reason for calling in at the station.

I told DC Ahmed that I have nothing against him and I appreciate that this is a heavy workload for people such as himself to deal with.

Inquiries continue

Peter
---------------------------------

It was after Captain Ralph Kohn’s response that mentally lifted me up a little as when you are dealing with such matters everyone thinks you are a conspiracy maniac…….on the contrary I double check everything myself before putting pen to paper as I realize its your reputation that is on the line. Feeling more optimistic than ever I responded to Ralph as follows:
From: PETER EYRE [mailto:peter.eyre7@btinternet.com]
Sent: 04 November 2010 08:21
To: ralph.kohn@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Fw: RE: Chinook ZD576
Hello again Ralph
Well as you would expect I don't give up easy so I am now speaking to my fourth Detective at the local police HQ and he, as are all the others scared of dealing with this issue so he's now past it onto the MOD......I told him that’s a waste of time as the previous military inquiry was rigged anyway etc etc.....so we will see.
I took your advice and wrote a letter....rather than posting it I had it hand delivered by a Scottish friend yesterday and also obtained a formal receipt.
Just thought I would keep you updated.
Please find attached as evidence.
Peter
---------------------------
Ralph’s brief response:

From: Ralph Kohn
Subject: RE: RE: Chinook ZD576
To: "'PETER EYRE'"
Date: Thursday, 4 November, 2010, 11:12
Thanks Peter,
The MoD’s reaction will be interesting
Ralph
------------------------------------



A Chinook in full flight


A copy of my evidence/letter to Lord Philip (the head of the new inquiry), which was hand delivered in Edinburgh, is shown below as well as the formal receipt obtained:




Further to all the emails and phone calls made in relation to this matter I have also discussed this accident with Chris Williamson MP at two surgeries and also in other correspondence and to date to no avail. One would think that such information would be of the highest priority but no one, including the police have any motivation to deal with this.
Here is my last communication to him on this topic:


Wednesday, 6 April, 2011 22:33

From Peter Eyre
To chris.williamson.mp@parliament.uk

Cc scotlandp@parliament.uk, williamss@parliament.uk, beckettm@parliament.uk, corbynj@parliament.uk, ranjit.banwait@live.co.uk, lucy.care@ntlworld.com, info@derbyconservatives.co.uk, info@derbylabourparty.co.uk, info@libdems.org.uk, feedback@peterlilley.co.uk, reportingafraud@sfo.gsi.gov.uk


To the Rt Hon Chris Williamson

I have asked you for formal evidence that the issues raised by myself on the excessive use of Depleted Uranium in current and past areas of conflict i.e. Libya. Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Pakistan, Lebanon, Gaza, Somalia, Yemen and now Libya have in actual fact been addressed as you indicated during your two surgeries.

You will also recall the discussion regarding the Crash of the Chinook in the Mull of Kintyre killing all 29 VIP passengers and the RAF Crew (who were initially blamed).

Some extremely senior Military, Police and MI5 were all onboard the same one helicopter as well as a very experienced special operations crew. In reality this would never be allowed at either Military or Civil level and is in itself extremely suspect....not to mention that possible sabotage was never looked at in the initial inquiry.

As you know a second inquiry is again underway and based on the information that I passed on to the local police (which was eventually passed on to the MoD) one would assume that this would be looked at in more detail and that I would have been interviewed regarding the information I have already supplied direct to the new Head of the Inquiry in Scotland (delivered by hand), to which I have received a written acknowledgement of receipt.

I have also submitted my own analysis of the crash along with some shortfalls which I myself observed in the original inquiry (having worked in the helicopter field for many years).

I have also spoken a few times to the head of the original Civilian Inquiry, Captain Ralph Kohn, whose team disagree with the MoD's original verdict.

I would therefore ask you to check on the status of this inquiry and if my statement is in the pipeline and will be considered along with new evidence that has since come to light.

Had this flight involved VIP's from the political sector one would assume that the inquiry would have been swift and accurate......unfortunately this has not been the case and certainly gives rise to the possibly of being an inside job, which is what my informant told me.

I did ask the question why did they die?......the response was that the Government were unhappy that the Northern Ireland Peace Talks were not moving along at the pace that they were seeking at the time.........when you have a problem you remove the problem.....hence the death of 29 VIP's involved in the NI process and the RAF Crew!!

Finally I am shocked that the nature of the extremely serious massive fraud that Gordon and I have briefed you on (amounting to billions of pounds, each and every year), plus the massive tax evasion still has not been addressed, despite the state of our economy and massive cut backs and job losses.

I have observed you, on many occasions (with your megaphone) protesting outside the Council Offices at the Conservative and Lib Dems cut backs in child centres etc and yet the root cause of our countries decline stemmed back during your parties term in office and the fraud that was and is still taking place in this country.

We have pointed out to you that forensic evidence on this massive corporate fraud, involving the Banks, Senior Political Figures and their Parties (amounting to billions of pounds per annum) is held by Gordon with copies distributed far and wide for security purposes and yet still no evidence that this issue has been raised in the Houses of Parliament.

Both Gordon and I again ask you to perform your duty, as our Parliamentary representative, in bringing these issues before Parliament in the interest of our nation and its current economy.

Your Sincerely

Peter Eyre
----------------------

Gordon Bowden received a letter from Chris Williamson regarding matters that had been raised and one paragraph of that letter (dated 22nr March 2011) stated:
“I don’t think ongoing correspondence with you on this issue is particularly productive. As you will appreciate I have over 70,000 other constituents in Derby North and many of them contact me with pressing personal concerns.”

Well Mr. Rt Hon Williamson what would be more pressing than the massive fraud that is putting your constituents under great personal stress due to loss of jobs, loss of their homes and reductions in allowances and public sector services?

What would be more pressing than the use of Depleted Uranium by coalitions forces causing mass suffering to millions of people around the world, including our own country and also our own troops?

What would be more pressing than to investigate if the Chinook helicopter that crashed on the 2nd of June 1994 (Mull of Kintyre), killing its highly specialised crew and 25 VIP passengers (high level terrorism experts from the Police, Military and MI5) may have been sabotaged by our own government?

What I found suspicious and very distressing were the words used by the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police, Leslie Sharp, when he made the following statement just hours after the crash:

“I make it clear that there is no reason whatsoever to suspect that we are dealing with anything other than a terrible tragic accident.” Why would a person so senior make such a statement immediately after the crash and who gave him the authority to make this statement? The circumstances and analysis is the duty of the investigation team and certainly not the Chief Constable.......I became deeply suspicious after his bold statement.

It should be noted that the Prime Minister at the time of the crash was John Major and the President of the Board of Trade was Michael Heseltine (now Lord Heseltine) who both were very keen to wind up the Northern Ireland Peace Talks after much pressure had been applied from the United States.

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant 12/4/2011 www.eyreinternational.com